Biden’s pick for top civil rights lawyer, argued blacks are the superior race in college.

[grbcane]

Now how would the press and democrats act if a Republican picked someone who believed whites were the superior race? I know, it’s only racist if white people think that.

Biden’s Pick For Civil Rights Head Argued Blacks Are The Superior Race

If Kristen Clarke is confirmed, it will mean Biden’s pledges to fight hate and antisemitism will be abandoned even before he begins to govern.

thefederalist.com

 

[cems52]

You seem to always be on the wrong side of intellectual discussions. To assist others in understanding your latest sham debate, here's a quote from the article.

In December 1994, Clarke co-authored a letter-to-the-editor of the Harvard Crimson as part of a debate about Charles Murray’s controversial book “The Bell Curve” and its discussion of differences in cognitive ability between human races. But in attacking Murray’s claims, Clarke put forward a counter-theory in which she argued research showed that African-Americans were the superior race, writing, “Melanin endows blacks with greater mental, physical and spiritual abilities — something which cannot be measured based on Eurocentric standards.”

Her counter argument to a racist book was to put forth a counter theory that suggested the opposite. That is, AA are the superior race based on the melanin in their skin.

Here's an example of what she was trying to convey. If you came to me and said your d_ck was bigger than mine I would counter with this. Not true based on genetically proven facts and historical gossip. I'm not suggesting I have a bigger d_ck than you but instead a counter argument which says otherwise.

 

[ellu]

You seem to always be on the wrong side of intellectual discussions. To assist others in understanding your latest sham debate, here's a quote from the article.

In December 1994, Clarke co-authored a letter-to-the-editor of the Harvard Crimson as part of a debate about Charles Murray’s controversial book “The Bell Curve” and its discussion of differences in cognitive ability between human races. But in attacking Murray’s claims, Clarke put forward a counter-theory in which she argued research showed that African-Americans were the superior race, writing, “Melanin endows blacks with greater mental, physical and spiritual abilities — something which cannot be measured based on Eurocentric standards.”

Her counter argument to a racist book was to put forth a counter theory that suggested the opposite. That is, AA are the superior race based on the melanin in their skin.

Here's an example of what she was trying to convey. If you came to me and said your d_ck was bigger than mine I would counter with this. Not true based on genetically proven facts and historical gossip. I'm not suggesting I have a bigger d_ck than you but instead a counter argument which says otherwise.

So her point was that the eugenics lie he was offering was best refuted by turning it on its head with an equally ridiculous premise, is so seems perfectly illustrative.

 

[Allied2651]

She may be capable however a divisive pick. I am sure there are many other civil rights lawyers as capable without a past. This smells like an Obama pick.

 

[ellu]

She may be capable however a divisive pick. I am sure there are many other civil rights lawyers as capable without a past. This smells like an Obama pick.

That actually reads as a compliment post-Trump appointments.

 

[grbcane]

You seem to always be on the wrong side of intellectual discussions. To assist others in understanding your latest sham debate, here's a quote from Here's an example of what she was trying to convey. If you came to me and said your d_ck was bigger than mine I would counter with this. Not true based on genetically proven facts and historical gossip. I'm not suggesting I have a bigger d_ck than you but instead a counter argument which says otherwise.

I love to see people try to defend this, it’s okay for one race of people , but not another.How do you rationalize your inconsistency?

 

[grbcane]

You seem to always be on the wrong side of intellectual discussions. To assist others in understanding your latest sham debate, here's a quote from the article.

In December 1994, Clarke co-authored a letter-to-the-editor of the Harvard Crimson as part of a debate about Charles Murray’s controversial book “The Bell Curve” and its discussion of differences in cognitive ability between human races. But in attacking Murray’s claims, Clarke put forward a counter-theory in which she argued research showed that African-Americans were the superior race, writing, “Melanin endows blacks with greater mental, physical and spiritual abilities — something which cannot be measured based on Eurocentric standards.”

Her counter argument to a racist book was to put forth a counter theory that suggested the opposite. That is, AA are the superior race based on the melanin in their skin.

Here's an example of what she was trying to convey. If you came to me and said your d_ck was bigger than mine I would counter with this. Not true based on genetically proven facts and historical gossip. I'm not suggesting I have a bigger d_ck than you but instead a counter argument which says otherwise.

She tried to do damage control, anyone can try to repair there actions, not surprised Biden nominated someone who’s ani-Semitic .

 

[ellu]

She tried to do damage control, anyone can try to repair there actions, not surprised Biden nominated someone who’s ani-Semitic .

Now she's anti-Semetic? Specific examples of her anti-semetism please. Ask me to do the same about the Donald and I'll happily respond to yours.

Still not sure why folks voted for Donald the anti-semite, who used anti-semetic tropes, comments, images and retweeted anti-semites on a regular basis, not to mention his "both sides" of literal Nazis and his recent calling Camp Auschwitz t-shirt wearers "go Home with Love", I guess that was after you voted for the anti-semite but I'll be happy to list his anti-semetism prior to you voting for the anti-semite.

Why vote for anti-semites?

 

[MungoGungo]

You seem to always be on the wrong side of intellectual discussions. To assist others in understanding your latest sham debate, here's a quote from the article.

In December 1994, Clarke co-authored a letter-to-the-editor of the Harvard Crimson as part of a debate about Charles Murray’s controversial book “The Bell Curve” and its discussion of differences in cognitive ability between human races. But in attacking Murray’s claims, Clarke put forward a counter-theory in which she argued research showed that African-Americans were the superior race, writing, “Melanin endows blacks with greater mental, physical and spiritual abilities — something which cannot be measured based on Eurocentric standards.”

Her counter argument to a racist book was to put forth a counter theory that suggested the opposite. That is, AA are the superior race based on the melanin in their skin.

Here's an example of what she was trying to convey. If you came to me and said your d_ck was bigger than mine I would counter with this. Not true based on genetically proven facts and historical gossip. I'm not suggesting I have a bigger d_ck than you but instead a counter argument which says otherwise.

so Clarke, who is a racist, was arguing with another racist about whose race is superior... That's the jist of it but you want to excuse her racist thoughts while condemning others. How bout we just jettison all these racist ideologues. You dont have make excuses just because she is a dem. Hold her to the same standards as everyone else.

 

[MungoGungo]

Now she's anti-Semetic? Specific examples of her anti-semetism please. Ask me to do the same about the Donald and I'll happily respond to yours.

Still not sure why folks voted for Donald the anti-semite, who used anti-semetic tropes, comments, images and retweeted anti-semites on a regular basis, not to mention his "both sides" of literal Nazis and his recent calling Camp Auschwitz t-shirt wearers "go Home with Love", I guess that was after you voted for the anti-semite but I'll be happy to list his anti-semetism prior to you voting for the anti-semite.

Why vote for anti-semites?

Whataboutism?

 

[ellu]

so Clarke, who is a racist, was arguing with another racist about whose race is superior... That's the jist of it but you want to excuse her racist thoughts while condemning others. How bout we just jettison all these racist ideologues.

I've never seen her be categorized as a racist until today, that's why I'm asking for specifically what she said that makes her racist or when. I read the article referenced, she is clearly making a distinguishing comparative, its easy to find and is not at all what its being argued as. Google it and read it, you know how spin goes man.

Now, if you have something she's done racist I'm interested.

 

[MungoGungo]

I've never seen her be categorized as a racist until today, that's why I'm asking for specifically what she said that makes her racist or when. I read the article referenced, she is clearly making a distinguishing comparative, its easy to find and is not at all what its being argued as. Google it and read it, you know how spin goes man.

Now, if you have something she's done racist I'm interested.

That's cool if you want to be a spin doctor. If any white person had written anything in any form about how whites are a genetically superior race then context would not matter...they would be rightfully condemned. Why the double standard?

 

[grbcane]

Now she's anti-Semetic? Specific examples of her anti-semetism please. Ask me to do the same about the Donald and I'll happily respond to yours.

Still not sure why folks voted for Donald the anti-semite, who used anti-semetic tropes, comments, images and retweeted anti-semites on a regular basis, not to mention his "both sides" of literal Nazis and his recent calling Camp Auschwitz t-shirt wearers "go Home with Love", I guess that was after you voted for the anti-semite but I'll be happy to list his anti-semetism prior to you voting for the anti-semite.

Why vote for anti-semites?

When she was ahead of the BSA she invited a professor who denied the Holocaust, and wrote a book called The Jewish Onslaught. She said Martian’s information was based on fact.

Donald Trump an anti-Semite, that’s fake news. His grandkids are Jewish, and he has done way more for the state of Israel than any other President, and it’s not even close.

The next is he’s homophobic, but he’s the first president to be for gay marriage before being elected.

The next is he’s racist, but since the Civil Rights movement, he by far got a larger vote of minorities than any other Republican candidate.

 

[ellu]

That's cool if you want to be a spin doctor. If any white person had written anything in any form about how whites are a genetically superior race then context would not matter...they would be rightfully condemned. Why the double standard?

Bro. That’s literally what she was responding to. The literal point of her response to a genetic racist was to essentially right hey, look how stupid genetic racism sounds. She literally cited the genetic argument and rhen made 4 equally ridiculous points to highlight it and then went into an actual discussion.

The problem is folks don’t read source material and the media likes to use summaries to sow divison.

The essay is short check it goes yourself.

 

[grbcane]

That's cool if you want to be a spin doctor. If any white person had written anything in any form about how whites are a genetically superior race then context would not matter...they would be rightfully condemned. Why the double standard?

All you have to is substitute a Trump nominee. Change the color of the nominee, and imagine the reaction of the press and the Democrat party, and their outrage would be justified.

 

[ellu]

When she was ahead of the BSA she invited a professor who denied the Holocaust, and wrote a book called The Jewish Onslaught. She said Martian’s information was based on fact.

Donald Trump an anti-Semite, that’s fake news. His grandkids are Jewish, and he has done way more for the state of Israel than any other President, and it’s not even close.

The next is he’s homophobic, but he’s the first president to be for gay marriage before being elected.

The next is he’s racist, but since the Civil Rights movement, he by far got a larger vote of minorities than any other Republican candidate.

Look like she ****ed up bad on that one. I agree unacceptable. She was 19 and apparently she has grown during college law school and into adulthood.


“This week, Kristen Clarke acknowledged she made a mistake when, as a student at Harvard, she gave a professor who promoted antisemitic conspiracy theories a platform,” Bend the Arc: Jewish Action said Thursday on Twitter. “She unequivocally denounces anti-Semitism — and acts upon that commitment in fighting religious discrimination.”

Also praising Clarke on Thursday for her work combatting anti-Semitism were the National Council of Jewish Women, the Jewish Democratic Council of America, and Joel Rubin, the American Jewish Congress executive director.



Rabbi Jill Jacobs, who directs T’ruah, a rabbinical human rights group, said in an interview that Clarke’s statement this week was a “model of teshuvah,” or repentance, and derided those on the right who would stigmatize someone for something they said as a teenager.

——But fact remains at 19 she said some inexcusable shit that she should spend her life working to repair and given her vocation she’ll have a chance to continue making amends.

 

[ellu]

All you have to is substitute a Trump nominee. Change the color of the nominee, and imagine the reaction of the press and the Democrat party, and their outrage would be justified.

Won’t be anymore than the faux anger. Literally you are either too lazy to read the article she wrote or hell bent on calling her controversial for what was satire. Either way, have at it. She’ll be great.

 

[cems52]

so Clarke, who is a racist, was arguing with another racist about whose race is superior... That's the jist of it but you want to excuse her racist thoughts while condemning others. How bout we just jettison all these racist ideologues. You dont have make excuses just because she is a dem. Hold her to the same standards as everyone else.

so Clarke, who is a racist, was arguing with another racist about whose race is superior... That's the jist of it but you want to excuse her racist thoughts while condemning others. How bout we just jettison all these racist ideologues. You dont have make excuses just because she is a dem. Hold her to the same standards as everyone else.

Nothing I've seen says she is a racist like Trump. I'm certain when that book came out you shouted down the racist rhetoric like you did about Charlottesville?

 

[cems52]

She tried to do damage control, anyone can try to repair there actions, not surprised Biden nominated someone who’s ani-Semitic .

Do you really want to debate Biden's cabinet vs Trump's in terms of race attitude and competence?

 

[cems52]

I love to see people try to defend this, it’s okay for one race of people , but not another.How do you rationalize your inconsistency?

Nothing here. I responded to your ridiculous suggestion she's racist based on her counter argument AA are not dumb like that racist author suggested.

 

[cems52]

So her point was that the eugenics lie he was offering was best refuted by turning it on its head with an equally ridiculous premise, is so seems perfectly illustrative.

Thank you!! You got it!!

 

[MungoGungo]

Nothing I've seen says she is a racist like Trump. I'm certain when that book came out you shouted down the racist rhetoric like you did about Charlottesville?

Whataboutism.

 

[Allied2651]

That actually reads as a compliment post-Trump appointments.

Not really...lol

 

[Allied2651]

Now she's anti-Semetic? Specific examples of her anti-semetism please. Ask me to do the same about the Donald and I'll happily respond to yours.

Still not sure why folks voted for Donald the anti-semite, who used anti-semetic tropes, comments, images and retweeted anti-semites on a regular basis, not to mention his "both sides" of literal Nazis and his recent calling Camp Auschwitz t-shirt wearers "go Home with Love", I guess that was after you voted for the anti-semite but I'll be happy to list his anti-semetism prior to you voting for the anti-semite.

Why vote for anti-semites?

Donald didn't..provid proof.

 

[Allied2651]

Nothing I've seen says she is a racist like Trump. I'm certain when that book came out you shouted down the racist rhetoric like you did about Charlottesville?

Cems , you must be in denial or can't read. She is an anti semite and a POS.

 

[cems52]

Cems , you must be in denial or can't read. She is an anti semite and a POS.

But Jewish organizations say otherwise.

 

[canesfan470]

Look like she ****ed up bad on that one. I agree unacceptable. She was 19 and apparently she has grown during college law school and into adulthood.


“This week, Kristen Clarke acknowledged she made a mistake when, as a student at Harvard, she gave a professor who promoted antisemitic conspiracy theories a platform,” Bend the Arc: Jewish Action said Thursday on Twitter. “She unequivocally denounces anti-Semitism — and acts upon that commitment in fighting religious discrimination.”

Also praising Clarke on Thursday for her work combatting anti-Semitism were the National Council of Jewish Women, the Jewish Democratic Council of America, and Joel Rubin, the American Jewish Congress executive director.



Rabbi Jill Jacobs, who directs T’ruah, a rabbinical human rights group, said in an interview that Clarke’s statement this week was a “model of teshuvah,” or repentance, and derided those on the right who would stigmatize someone for something they said as a teenager.

——But fact remains at 19 she said some inexcusable shit that she should spend her life working to repair and given her vocation she’ll have a chance to continue making amends.

If someone else made that mistake..cancelled..no chance

 

[ellu]

If someone else made that mistake..cancelled..no chance

Bullshit. There isn’t a politician on the left or right that could survive scrutiny as an undergrad 30 years later. Hell Jim Jordan did shit worse in his post collegiate career. Trump did worse in his 50s. Folks tried to cancel Warnock for something in his 30s and failed.

so we doing 19 year olds spent the last 20 years making up for it?

Whoa! Lotta GOP and DNC bout to get hammered...especially 45. When he was that age wasnt he being sued for discrimination? Wasn’t Obama smoking cheeba cheeba at that age?

Bush was doing g blow, Clinton was raping...

But hey keep up the faux outrage. The right complains about “cancel culture” but they mastered that shot first “freedom fries” and TGFKA “Dixie Chicks” can tell ya all about it.

 

[canesfan470]

Bullshit. There isn’t a politician on the left or right that could survive scrutiny as an undergrad 30 years later. Hell Jim Jordan did shit worse in his post collegiate career. Trump did worse in his 50s. Folks tried to cancel Warnock for something in his 30s and failed.

so we doing 19 year olds spent the last 20 years making up for it?

Whoa! Lotta GOP and DNC bout to get hammered...especially 45. When he was that age wasnt he being sued for discrimination? Wasn’t Obama smoking cheeba cheeba at that age?

Bush was doing g blow, Clinton was raping...

But hey keep up the faux outrage. The right complains about “cancel culture” but they mastered that shot first “freedom fries” and TGFKA “Dixie Chicks” can tell ya all about it.

Bullshit..u only see things one way...they cancelled a lot of people and things this yr