For clarity its not a University of Wyoming article, its by a Professor at the University. Some folks have difficulty processing how an individual's perspective isn't necessarily that of the institution.
This professor in the past has been criticized for his non-neutrality, a literal quote "
A new University of Wyoming professor has been criticized for being the energy industry's go-to academic for highlighting the positives, and not the negatives, of fossil fuel development.
Timothy Considine is a professor of economics at UW's School of Energy Resources. Before leaving Penn State University, he began researching a report paid for by an oil and gas group called the Marcellus Shale Coalition.
He finished the report while at the University of Wyoming."
The article is from Western Energy Alliance and the Petroleum Association of Wyoming in response to the report.
Western Energy Alliance group has a PAC - they are literal lobbyist.
https://www.westernenergyalliance.org/pac.html
Petroleum Association of Wyoming's
President Pete Obermueller has the distinction of being the top lobbyist
https://trib.com/news/state-and-reg...cle_8848687b-e715-586c-b0be-db56e2af9e03.html
So is this a good thing for energy? Not likely, they lobbied the last administration for it and got reform that gave growth, only, issue I take is the mischaracterization of the source and the presumption of a non bias in the opinion.
Personally, I own property where natural gas has been found in Florida (Collier County) and I sit on a Board with Shell senior leadership, just clarifying the presentation of the info is all.