ADVERTISEMENT

Great follow up exposing Jimmy Kimmels soap box lies!!! Scary he used his son in a lie!!

Your mysogonist, racist against Asians, always putting down any woman with an opinion. Sick Cems!! Hates women!
I don't hate anybody. I don't agree with the opinions of right wingers like Michelle. I've seen her act many times. I know you have no clue.
 
I don't hate anybody. I don't agree with the opinions of right wingers like Michelle. I've seen her act many times. I know you have no clue.
Again "right wingers" yet your open minded and so well rounded. That's your argument for everything! It's corny and used up! You have no ideas or solutions just labels. Your always hating on women, always
 
Your mysogonist, racist against Asians, always putting down any woman with an opinion. Sick Cems!! Hates women!


If you don't improve your game I'll have to direct my brilliance to other posters. You are no challenge. Your lies are becoming old.

images
 
Again "right wingers" yet your open minded and so well rounded. That's your argument for everything! It's corny and used up! You have no ideas or solutions just labels. Your always hating on women, always


Really? You need to wake up and smell the coffee.

images
 
If you don't improve your game I'll have to direct my brilliance to other posters. You are no challenge. Your lies are becoming old.

images

Kind of like Hillary taking full responsibility for losing only to blame others.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OzonaCane1
Kind of like Hillary taking full responsibility for losing only to blame others.
If you get a chance, and this is for both libs and conservatives, read the book "Shattered" which is about her campaign. The book is receiving critical acclaim. I am half way through it and the Clintons give new meaning to the word narcissism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OzonaCane1
If you get a chance, and this is for both libs and conservatives, read the book "Shattered" which is about her campaign. The book is receiving critical acclaim. I am half way through it and the Clintons give new meaning to the word narcissism.

Don't need to read it. They funneled millions thru their "foundation" and have had many murdered for the better of three decades. Don't care to know any more. I have no intention of wasting a second of my life learning more about those scum bags.
 
If you get a chance, and this is for both libs and conservatives, read the book "Shattered" which is about her campaign. The book is receiving critical acclaim. I am half way through it and the Clintons give new meaning to the word narcissism.
Looks like we do have some commonality. I just started to read the book. It is indeed an interesting read so far.
 
Looks like we do have some commonality. I just started to read the book. It is indeed an interesting read so far.
Crazy stuff, huh. This is why I believe the whole Russia interfering with the election is overblown. Yes, they shouldnt have hacked the DNC.....I agree. But it wasnt like they revealed the playbook so to speak. It revealed a sinister plot by high level DNC members to keep Sanders out, when in reality Sanders probably had the better chance. In essence, Podesta and his pals helped sink the Dems because many Bernie supporters stayed home. Say what you want about Trump, but Clinton was much worse imo because at least Trump never hid who he was or should I say it was difficult to hide who he was. As wealthy as Trump is he connected with people ten times better than Clinton.
 
Crazy stuff, huh. This is why I believe the whole Russia interfering with the election is overblown. Yes, they shouldnt have hacked the DNC.....I agree. But it wasnt like they revealed the playbook so to speak. It revealed a sinister plot by high level DNC members to keep Sanders out, when in reality Sanders probably had the better chance. In essence, Podesta and his pals helped sink the Dems because many Bernie supporters stayed home. Say what you want about Trump, but Clinton was much worse imo because at least Trump never hid who he was or should I say it was difficult to hide who he was. As wealthy as Trump is he connected with people ten times better than Clinton.

I don't understand your position that the Russia thing is overblown. The biggest threat to our democracy is Russia regardless of party affiliation. Our intelligence agencies have confirmed this. Is it not in our best interest to understand what happened and how the Russians pulled it off? Is it not important to know who if any may have colluded with the Russians?
 
I don't understand your position that the Russia thing is overblown. The biggest threat to our democracy is Russia regardless of party affiliation. Our intelligence agencies have confirmed this. Is it not in our best interest to understand what happened and how the Russians pulled it off? Is it not important to know who if any may have colluded with the Russians?
I agree, we need to know if there was collusion. But so many Dems are blaming Russia for the loss when in fact what Russia did was expose a conspiracy within the DNC. Obviously, Clinton supporters have an issue with the hack, but Bernie supporters didnt because it proved all along that the primaries were rigged against Bernie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dr.L.ThugU
I don't understand your position that the Russia thing is overblown. The biggest threat to our democracy is Russia regardless of party affiliation. Our intelligence agencies have confirmed this. Is it not in our best interest to understand what happened and how the Russians pulled it off? Is it not important to know who if any may have colluded with the Russians?
Don't be a hypocrite , if that's your stance then go ahead and say Obama is a fool for minimizing the Russian threat and ridiculing Romney when he said Russia was the greatest geopolitical threat we faced.

You won't do it........
 
I don't understand your position that the Russia thing is overblown. The biggest threat to our democracy is Russia regardless of party affiliation. Our intelligence agencies have confirmed this. Is it not in our best interest to understand what happened and how the Russians pulled it off? Is it not important to know who if any may have colluded with the Russians?
Your party said Global Warming was biggest threat! When did our intelligence agencies confirm this?? Your so full of bullshit!! Pulled what off?? Your again full of bullshit!! And if they'd colluded you dont think we would have known when Obama illegally wiretapped Trumps campaign team?? Your a total dope!! Always with your lies and repeating National Enquirer fantasies
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dr.L.ThugU
I agree, we need to know if there was collusion. But so many Dems are blaming Russia for the loss when in fact what Russia did was expose a conspiracy within the DNC. Obviously, Clinton supporters have an issue with the hack, but Bernie supporters didnt because it proved all along that the primaries were rigged against Bernie.
I do not blame the Russia hack on Hillary's loss. I simply want to ensure the Russians don't do what they did in 2016 again. The Russians don't care which party they support as long as our democracy fails. Are you feeling me now?
 
I do not blame the Russia hack on Hillary's loss. I simply want to ensure the Russians don't do what they did in 2016 again. The Russians don't care which party they support as long as our democracy fails. Are you feeling me now?
What did they do in 2016? Why don't you people ever take responsibility and just admit you lost!! Your Russia excuse isn't fooling anyone!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dr.L.ThugU
Don't be a hypocrite , if that's your stance then go ahead and say Obama is a fool for minimizing the Russian threat and ridiculing Romney when he said Russia was the greatest geopolitical threat we faced.

You won't do it........

This has nothing to do with the topic we're discussing. Please stay on topic. Here's the question. Do you want to know how the Russians undermined our democracy and if Americans were involved?
 
This has nothing to do with the topic we're discussing. Please stay on topic. Here's the question. Do you want to know how the Russians undermined our democracy and if Americans were involved?
Again dummy with the Russians?? Lolol
However no evidence to back up these claims so till then your the liar everyone says you are!
 
I do not blame the Russia hack on Hillary's loss. I simply want to ensure the Russians don't do what they did in 2016 again. The Russians don't care which party they support as long as our democracy fails. Are you feeling me now?
If thats your intent, than metaphorically speaking, I feel you (had to add that disclaimer). But I think you would agree that many libs arent so concerned about Russia interfering, but rather want the hacks to be tied directly to Trump. If the shoe was on the other foot in that Russia helped Clinton many dems would say........wait for it.....its a nothing burger...lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OzonaCane1
I don't understand your position that the Russia thing is overblown. The biggest threat to our democracy is Russia regardless of party affiliation. Our intelligence agencies have confirmed this. Is it not in our best interest to understand what happened and how the Russians pulled it off? Is it not important to know who if any may have colluded with the Russians?

maybe Hillary can explain what she was doing giving Russia 20% of its uranium in that Obama limp wristed foreign policy display of "resetting" relations between Russia and the US when she was Secretary of State- you know the symbolic stupid ass jesture of pushing of the red reset button like she was ordering copy paper and some pilot ballpoint pens from Staples.

or Obama can explain how he was caught on a hot mic while talking about softening things up with Russia when he was out of office. Or Podesta worming his weasely liberal ass out of explaining his connections to Moscow.

an argument can be made that the Democrats have warmer relations with Russia than Trump and his administration. hilarious to hear liberals continuously peddle Russian conspiracy theories when they seem to be the ones giving Russian operatives weekly hand jobs
 
If thats your intent, than metaphorically speaking, I feel you (had to add that disclaimer). But I think you would agree that many libs arent so concerned about Russia interfering, but rather want the hacks to be tied directly to Trump. If the shoe was on the other foot in that Russia helped Clinton many dems would say........wait for it.....its a nothing burger...lol.
Of course but the shoe is not on the other foot. Russia wanted Trump to win not Hillary. We as Americans need to put country first not party. At the end of the day if Hillary colluded with the Russians for me that's treason. And she should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Do you feel similar about Trump?
 
Of course but the shoe is not on the other foot. Russia wanted Trump to win not Hillary. We as Americans need to put country first not party. At the end of the day if Hillary colluded with the Russians for me that's treason. And she should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
And again if your actually being honest then provide evidence for these Trump- Russian ties. If you've got more info than FBI director all the way down in Parkland show it!! You really believe this bullshit which is scary!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dr.L.ThugU
Of course but the shoe is not on the other foot. Russia wanted Trump to win not Hillary. We as Americans need to put country first not party. At the end of the day if Hillary colluded with the Russians for me that's treason. And she should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Do you feel similar about Trump?
Treason is treason my man. But honestly, I would be shocked if Trump is implicated. A guy in his campaign who is low on the totem poll like goofball Carter Page....sure, maybe. But I dont see this derailing Trump. With leaks every day we would hear or get a feeling of the pulse of the WH during these investigations.....and I havent heard anything yet. Time will tell. Your reasons for the investigation are very different from other dems who only want to see collusion if it leads back to Trump rather than take steps to prevent it in the future.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: OzonaCane1
I don't hate anybody. I don't agree with the opinions of right wingers like Michelle. I've seen her act many times. I know you have no clue.
If he has no clue as you say how come every time you argue w/ him it is like you are looking down the barrel of a loaded gun........
 
Treason is treason my man. But honestly, I would be shocked if Trump is implicated. A guy in his campaign who is low on the totem poll like goofball Carter Page....sure, maybe. But I dont see this derailing Trump. With leaks every day we would hear or get a feeling of the pulse of the WH during these investigations.....and I havent heard anything yet. Time will tell. Your reasons for the investigation are very different from other dems who only want to see collusion if it leads back to Trump rather than take steps to prevent it in the future.
Since we're being open and honest with each other I want both. That is, if it leads back to Trump, he's out and Pence is in. As with any partisan person the aim is to weaken the opposition so your party can win the next election. However, this is not my motivation for the investigation. I strongly believe we have to prevent Russian interference in the future.
 
And again if your actually being honest then provide evidence for these Trump- Russian ties. If you've got more info than FBI director all the way down in Parkland show it!! You really believe this bullshit which is scary!!
You really know how to mess up a wet dream with your non-stop babble. It's not my job to investigate Russian ties. That's what the FBI is doing and the investigation is still underway. If you want to be part of this adult conversation start behaving like an adult.
 
Again dummy with the Russians?? Lolol
However no evidence to back up these claims so till then your the liar everyone says you are!
Why don't you let the investigation play out and stop your nonstop divisive rhetoric. You are like the kid next door always trying to get attention but everyone ignores you.

images
 
maybe Hillary can explain what she was doing giving Russia 20% of its uranium in that Obama limp wristed foreign policy display of "resetting" relations between Russia and the US when she was Secretary of State- you know the symbolic stupid ass jesture of pushing of the red reset button like she was ordering copy paper and some pilot ballpoint pens from Staples.

or Obama can explain how he was caught on a hot mic while talking about softening things up with Russia when he was out of office. Or Podesta worming his weasely liberal ass out of explaining his connections to Moscow.

an argument can be made that the Democrats have warmer relations with Russia than Trump and his administration. hilarious to hear liberals continuously peddle Russian conspiracy theories when they seem to be the ones giving Russian operatives weekly hand jobs

It would be helpful if you could stop writing run on sentences that make no sense. The only investigation I'm aware of is the Trump/Russia investigation not Hillary's uranium deal. If you want a uranium deal investigation contact FBI Director Comey.

It's a bit odd we have an American president who has NEVER said a bad word about our biggest threat on the planet, Russia's Communist leader Putin. I think we have the right investigation underway.

This might help you..

run-on-sentences-1-728.jpg
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT