Yeah he's a well known like you to lie and say what he thinks people want to hear. Also Trump turned him down after he asked for a cabinet post. He knows he will lose his senate seat for being exposed as a political BS artist
Senior due to being there the longest, yes he's a War hero. However that doesn't give him a free pass.Nice try. He is a senior GOP official and well respected in the party. A war hero.
He is indeed all those things that you say but yet I can't help but wonder about the intelligence of someone that would pick Sarah Palin as their running mate.Think about that for a minute. If McCain would have won we would have been one step away from having her as President of our country. But then again at least she would have been able to keep her eyes on the Russians for us and then maybe we could have avoided all of this talk about Trump's ties to that country.Nice try. He is a senior GOP official and well respected in the party. A war hero.
He is indeed all those things that you say but yet I can't help but wonder about the intelligence of someone that would pick Sarah Palin as their running mate.Think about that for a minute. If McCain would have won we would have been one step away from having her as President of our country. But then again at least she would have been able to keep her eyes on the Russians for us and then maybe we could have avoided all of this talk about Trump's ties to that country.
This fact makes it even more telling he is calling out Trump. Not surprised he picked her as a running mate...just like someone like Trump could be nominated and win. That's a separate issue. The GOP will do absolutely anything for power. They will spend millions on Bengahzi. Complain about spending and stay quite when Trump spends more in one much than Obama has in tax payer dollars for family needs. They will complain about emails and security and literally keep quite about the man with the football being on facebook. There is no limit to their hypocrisy. But they defend their own. They only want to use Trump because he is a person that can be used. They see the same things in him that Putin sees in him. A cuck.He is indeed all those things that you say but yet I can't help but wonder about the intelligence of someone that would pick Sarah Palin as their running mate.Think about that for a minute. If McCain would have won we would have been one step away from having her as President of our country. But then again at least she would have been able to keep her eyes on the Russians for us and then maybe we could have avoided all of this talk about Trump's ties to that country.
It's not telling at all if you know his act, he's a joke within Republican circles. He's a punchline. "Spending millions on Benghazi" so it's not important to you to find out why American service members were killed in cold blood? They don't matter? You'd rather spend BILLIONS on illegals that have done zero for this country instead of Americans? You got issues. The Football again? Your the only person in the world who even cares about that nonsense, it's a non issue. You need a hobbyThis fact makes it even more telling he is calling out Trump. Not surprised he picked her as a running mate...just like someone like Trump could be nominated and win. That's a separate issue. The GOP will do absolutely anything for power. They will spend millions on Bengahzi. Complain about spending and stay quite when Trump spends more in one much than Obama has in tax payer dollars for family needs. They will complain about emails and security and literally keep quite about the man with the football being on facebook. There is no limit to their hypocrisy. But they defend their own. They only want to use Trump because he is a person that can be used. They see the same things in him that Putin sees in him. A cuck.
lmao @ John McCain being irrelevant in the political landscape. Thanks for the laugh. Especially thanks for the laugh at the idea our war heros are irrelevant. To whom? Our war heros are always relevant. You put way too much in partisan nonsense dude. To the point you have decided our country is not as important since a war hero isn't relevant. Without people like him, none of this matters. Even democrats respect this. This is the craziest idea of yours yet. "His status as a war hero is irrelevant". WTH has Donald Trump ever done for this country but evade war and taxes? WOW...what a con job. I give him that much.Exactly lol... McCain is a turncoat Republican. His status as a war hero is irrelevant to the fact he has become a closet Democrat. he is irrelevant in the political landscape and has become a crotchety old man
Well, the people detained under the executive order? Many were in fact legal...so. They got that way defending this country too btw. That kills that argument. I am sure the pentagon cares. Which is why that person no longer has the football. It is someone else now. Do think they care?It's not telling at all if you know his act, he's a joke within Republican circles. He's a punchline. "Spending millions on Benghazi" so it's not important to you to find out why American service members were killed in cold blood? They don't matter? You'd rather spend BILLIONS on illegals that have done zero for this country instead of Americans? You got issues. The Football again? Your the only person in the world who even cares about that nonsense, it's a non issue. You need a hobby
Actually he has and he opposed an important one in Tillerson. He is not playing both sides on this. He has been against Trump from day 1 and even when he took office was vocal. You have to understand. He is still a republican though.If he was a turncoat he most likely would have voted against some of Trump's picks.
McCain is just trying to play both sides, and failing.
Actually he has and he opposed an important one in Tillerson. He is not playing both sides on this. He has been against Trump from day 1 and even when he took office was vocal. You have to understand. He is still a republican though.
Totally irrelevant!! Guys a blowhard, he's a placated the Dems nonstop. If you care so much about the Military and the civil servants why do you trivialize them so much when it serves your argument. Another example of your taking out of both sides of your mouth!lmao @ John McCain being irrelevant in the political landscape. Thanks for the laugh. Especially thanks for the laugh at the idea our war heros are irrelevant. To whom? Our war heros are always relevant. You put way too much in partisan nonsense dude. To the point you have decided our country is not as important since a war hero isn't relevant. Without people like him, none of this matters. Even democrats respect this. This is the craziest idea of yours yet. "His status as a war hero is irrelevant". WTH has Donald Trump ever done for this country but evade war and taxes? WOW...what a con job. I give him that much.
You're wrong. He voted Yes.
I have never trivialized the military. Stop making things up. Especially our heroic soldiers who made a lot of sacrifices...but it sounds like to me that is exactly what you are doing here. Trivializing what a POW has done for this country.Totally irrelevant!! Guys a blowhard, he's a placated the Dems nonstop. If you care so much about the Military and the civil servants why do you trivialize them so much when it serves your argument. Another example of your taking out of both sides of your mouth!
Who cares what John McCain thinks? Again he doesn't speak for the President or the Party. Tillerson ran ExxonMobil, he's plenty qualified for anything. Hillary was more qualified? Lmfao, First Lady then a Senator from a state she never lived in made her qualified? Lmfao what a clown
You posted a picture of the chopper from the Yemen raid and said "lol successful mission" then you stated today "they wasted millions on Benghazi" that's trivializingI have never trivialized the military. Stop making things up. Especially our heroic soldiers who made a lot of sacrifices...but it sounds like to me that is exactly what you are doing here. Trivializing what a POW has done for this country.
His constituents apparently care. He speaks for himself. Because he is an elected official. Get it? Yep...she was. Had a 68% approval rating in the job....and stood up to putin....and wasn't Putins cuck like this guy and trump. Why do you think Putin interfered with the election and yes there is evidence he did.Who cares what John McCain thinks? Again he doesn't speak for the President or the Party. Tillerson ran ExxonMobil, he's plenty qualified for anything. Hillary was more qualified? Lmfao, First Lady then a Senator from a state she never lived in made her qualified? Lmfao what a clown
Yeah, my bad. I am trivializing sending our forces into a mission that they weren't prepared to go into over an over cooked steak. Didn't even use the situation room...and I am the one trivializing it? No, sir...I am the one outlining for people like yourself this is unacceptable. That's like saying emmett tills mother trivialized his funeral by having it open casket for everyone to see. I want you to see the millions wasted in the helicopter. I want you to see the lives trivialized over a steak dinner. Benghazi was proven to be a waste of money or Hillary would be in jail.You posted a picture of the chopper from the Yemen raid and said "lol successful mission" then you stated today "they wasted millions on Benghazi" that's trivializing
Elected official suppose to tell me what? So he got elected? Now he's trying to appease the Indeoendents and whomever else with rhetoric. "Get it" your a pompous little punk. 68% approval rating? When?? Did her a lot of good running for president, and if it was 68% why didn't she win the election? Lmfao more lies!! Your lies are so funny, you make yourself look so foolish! Where is the evidence Putin interfered?? Show the world the evidence! And again, if so how did she get more votes? Get it? Your a liarHis constituents apparently care. He speaks for himself. Because he is an elected official. Get it? Yep...she was. Had a 68% approval rating in the job....and stood up to putin....and wasn't Putins cuck like this guy and trump. Why do you think Putin interfered with the election and yes there is evidence he did.
The steak dinner defense again? When it was planned under Obama?? Again show where and how Generals approved a mission that they felt wasn't planned, or planned over a steak dinner. When was Benghazi "proven" to be a waste of money?? How was that proven?? Besides the fact that Hillary was exposed for the liar that she is, another reason she is so hated!! Another reason she lost!! Just more evidence she wasn't qualified. More evidence your a clueless clown stuck in a cubicleYeah, my bad. I am trivializing sending our forces into a mission that they weren't prepared to go into over an over cooked steak. Didn't even use the situation room...and I am the one trivializing it? No, sir...I am the one outlining for people like yourself this is unacceptable. That's like saying emmett tills mother trivialized his funeral by having it open casket for everyone to see. I want you to see the millions wasted in the helicopter. I want you to see the lives trivialized over a steak dinner. Benghazi was proven to be a waste of money or Hillary would be in jail.
Elected official suppose to tell me what? So he got elected? Now he's trying to appease the Indeoendents and whomever else with rhetoric. "Get it" your a pompous little punk. 68% approval rating? When?? Did her a lot of good running for president, and if it was 68% why didn't she win the election? Lmfao more lies!! Your lies are so funny, you make yourself look so foolish! Where is the evidence Putin interfered?? Show the world the evidence! And again, if so how did she get more votes? Get it? Your a liar
Read the Clinton article when it was supposed to be 69%, lmfao.I was wrong about Hillarys approval rating. My bad. It was actually 69% lmao.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...y-clintons-approval-rating-secretary-state-w/
These reports were declassified sir. The CIA and FBI agree:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ac61c0ef74d_story.html?utm_term=.3e7d6de0f852
Politifact ruled dude. Nice try though...Read the Clinton article when it was supposed to be 69%, lmfao.
Leaked CIA and FBI documents? Unsourced don't count!! Again why did she get more votes if it was rigged?
http://www.gallup.com/poll/193913/clinton-image-lowest-point-two-decades.aspx
Here's a Gallop poll. Has her at 38% approval rating
Read Gallop above, lmfao they actually did the poll. Not an opinion like Gallop. Again if she's at 68% how do she lose the election. "Nice try" you sound like you 10 year old whiney little girlPolitifact ruled dude. Nice try though...
Lmfao according to AOL, they count as much as John McCain
She lost the election because she had not been secretary of state in quite some time bro. John Kerry was. Don't believe me? Look it up. Politifact ruled it as true. I said her approval rating was 68% and it was actually 69%....and give you proof that it was. Politifact backed it. You are trying to change the subject to why she didn't get elected. I don't know why. I never said anything about the election. I said she had a 68% approval rating and I was right.....Read Gallop above, lmfao they actually did the poll. Not an opinion like Gallop. Again if she's at 68% how do she lose the election. "Nice try" you sound like you 10 year old whiney little girl
"She lost the election she had no been Secratery in quite some time" not true as usual. Also it doesn't make any sense. It's your ususal nonsense. And you can't get cocky and excited however you didn't read the entire article you sent me. Look at the Gallop poll. Not changing subject, however if she was at 68 or 69% she wins the election EASY!! Your so happy for once you think you got me, however you just end up with more egg on your face! Just another sticky nut in your eye.She lost the election because she had not been secretary of state in quite some time bro. John Kerry was. Don't believe me? Look it up. Politifact ruled it as true. I said her approval rating was 68% and it was actually 69%....and give you proof that it was. Politifact backed it. You are trying to change the subject to why she didn't get elected. I don't know why. I never said anything about the election. I said she had a 68% approval rating and I was right.....
BOOYAAAA
Lmfao, I've been busting you up for MONTHS!! Like I said read the article you used dumbass. Here's another funny CD theme, you cry yesterday I should be "banned" for being mean. Yet today you attacked me from your first post. All because I've called you out and exposed you for the liar you are. And the Politifact article as usual pointed out a time frame, not the overall approval rating for Clinton. Politifact like you takes small samples and spins it.Have enough? or are you thirsty for more?
Now you want to whine and complain. If you can't run with the big dogs. Stay under the porch. A simple google will tell you Hillary had a high approval rating as secretary of state. You don't need to use my sources. Look it up for yourself. She had a high approval rating. I never mentioned anything about an election. I simply stated her approval rating for the job of secretary of state when you attacked that.Lmfao, I've been busting you up for MONTHS!! Like I said read the article you used dumbass. Here's another funny CD theme, you cry yesterday I should be "banned" for being mean. Yet today you attacked me from your first post. All because I've called you out and exposed you for the liar you are. And the Politifact article as usual pointed out a time frame, not the overall approval rating for Clinton. Politifact like you takes small samples and spins it.
Lololololol, "run with the big dogs" you must be the cubicle tough guy at work! You run the coffee room. Again I've been exposing you for weeks as a liar and a fraud. You get called out daily for double talk and lies. And has nothing to do with anything except for the fact your not honorable, you cry I should be banned yet you think you got a free pass to act like a douche. And if her rating was that high she would have won the election. Even your simple feeble mind should understand that.Now you want to whine and complain. If you can't run with the big dogs. Stay under the porch. A simple google will tell you Hillary had a high approval rating as secretary of state. You don't need to use my sources. Look it up for yourself. She had a high approval rating. I never mentioned anything about an election. I simply stated her approval rating for the job of secretary of state when you attacked that.
There is no "if her rating was that high" because it is proven already that it was...and you keep talking about an election. The thing I proved was the rating. Also, she was not secretary of state before the election. She resigned to run for president. How many times do I have to tell you. That was John Kerry. Her rating was that high long before an election. Why can't you grasp these things?Lololololol, "run with the big dogs" you must be the cubicle tough guy at work! You run the coffee room. Again I've been exposing you for weeks as a liar and a fraud. You get called out daily for double talk and lies. And has nothing to do with anything except for the fact your not honorable, you cry I should be banned yet you think you got a free pass to act like a douche. And if her rating was that high she would have won the election. Even your simple feeble mind should understand that.
Her rating was "high" for a small time frame. That wasn't her overall performance rating. So everyone forgot her after she resigned? There's no cooreleation between a rating and an election? Oh maybe there isn't because according to the "media" she was suppose to win in a landslide.There is no "if her rating was that high" because it is proven already that it was...and you keep talking about an election. The thing I proved was the rating. Also, she was not secretary of state before the election. She resigned to run for president. How many times do I have to tell you. That was John Kerry. Her rating was that high long before an election. Why can't you grasp these things?
And CD, honestly your juvenile "why can't you grasp these things" or "you don't know what I know" those lines are so pompous and another reason why your not respectedThere is no "if her rating was that high" because it is proven already that it was...and you keep talking about an election. The thing I proved was the rating. Also, she was not secretary of state before the election. She resigned to run for president. How many times do I have to tell you. That was John Kerry. Her rating was that high long before an election. Why can't you grasp these things?