ADVERTISEMENT

Kyle Rittenhouse

cdwright40

SuperCane
Aug 14, 2007
88,132
29,907
113
So let's move on to the Play Stupid Games, Win Stupid Prizes section of Trumps America:

1. He was 17. It was illegal for him to possess that rifle. In his home state you have to be 21, in Wisconsin you have to be 18. This was crime one.
2. Crossing the state line with an illegally possessed weapon is a pretty big deal and a big fat number two on the crime list.
3. Wisconsin totally allows for the use of deadly force in self defense, but the caveat is that you can't be committing a crime while that use of force happens. Which we addressed above he was actively committing a crime by possessing that rifle.
4. Wisconsin has a Castle Doctrine. But you can only use deadly force if the perpetrators are in your dwelling or your place of business. For a place of business you have to own this, or be in charge of operations of the business. You can not just post up to protect a random business, also you can not chase people if they decide to retreat like this 17yo did. Wisconsin V. Charles L Chew is the case law. If you want to have a look.
5. Its not self defense when you get in your car with a rifle, drive 16 miles to another town, and walk the streets with a rifle.
He had every option to stay home but he chose to get involved in this situation with the plan to be involved in confrontation (hence the rifle) also in Wisconsin self defense law you can't be the instigator and then claim self defense.
He became the instigator the second he pursued.
I get it. The kid thought he was gonna be a hero and help out. But, reality is he made a large number of bad mistakes because he's 17 and has his face buried in what essentially amounts to propaganda everyday and can't tell the difference.
Now 2 people are dead and he's headed to jail.
This is what all those "shoot the protestors" comments create.
Here's a link to the Wisconsin laws im referring to and I'll post a link to his arrest story in the comments.
https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/939/III/48
 
So let's move on to the Play Stupid Games, Win Stupid Prizes section of Trumps America:

1. He was 17. It was illegal for him to possess that rifle. In his home state you have to be 21, in Wisconsin you have to be 18. This was crime one.
2. Crossing the state line with an illegally possessed weapon is a pretty big deal and a big fat number two on the crime list.
3. Wisconsin totally allows for the use of deadly force in self defense, but the caveat is that you can't be committing a crime while that use of force happens. Which we addressed above he was actively committing a crime by possessing that rifle.
4. Wisconsin has a Castle Doctrine. But you can only use deadly force if the perpetrators are in your dwelling or your place of business. For a place of business you have to own this, or be in charge of operations of the business. You can not just post up to protect a random business, also you can not chase people if they decide to retreat like this 17yo did. Wisconsin V. Charles L Chew is the case law. If you want to have a look.
5. Its not self defense when you get in your car with a rifle, drive 16 miles to another town, and walk the streets with a rifle.
He had every option to stay home but he chose to get involved in this situation with the plan to be involved in confrontation (hence the rifle) also in Wisconsin self defense law you can't be the instigator and then claim self defense.
He became the instigator the second he pursued.
I get it. The kid thought he was gonna be a hero and help out. But, reality is he made a large number of bad mistakes because he's 17 and has his face buried in what essentially amounts to propaganda everyday and can't tell the difference.
Now 2 people are dead and he's headed to jail.
This is what all those "shoot the protestors" comments create.
Here's a link to the Wisconsin laws im referring to and I'll post a link to his arrest story in the comments.
https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/939/III/48

CLOWN ALERT... beep,beep,beep...
 
Woulda Coulda Shoulda....that doesn't factor in when you get in front of a judge and jury. You either were so supposed to be there or you weren't. You decided to go there. That's the way it works....and you going to defend people and things isn't a defense. Sorry it just isn't.....and you weren't supposed to be there carrying an weapon ILLEGALLY. My parents failed me? Yeah, I am pretty sure you can say this about every criminal ever.....lol. So what? YOU FAILED!!!
 
Not Quilty..!!! should of taken out more of you commie bastards....!!!
 
I said his parents failed him...he didnt say that. That's my opinion. I would have never let me kid go even though I agree with what they were doing. He did decide and he will have to live with the consequences. I personally dont feel he should be charged with murder but the courts will figure that out.

I just love how all of sudden you are all for consequences and personal accountability. You only know what your handlers tell you to know. I doubt you have ever had a free thought in your life.
He murdered 2 people. Attempted to murder a couple more. What else would be the charge? He went looking for trouble and got it.
 
Someone please tell the pinhead in chief that Rittenhouse did NOT CROSS state lines with a weapon . The weapon was loaned to him by a friend in Wisconsin -
He did not illegally possess a firearm . He did NOT break any law by carrying a firearm
 
He murdered 2 people. Attempted to murder a couple more. What else would be the charge? He went looking for trouble and got it.
This narrative of he went out looking for murder is just patently false. He was defending a car dealership (and I agree a minor has no business doing this) and upon leaving was attacked by rioters. The narrative that he is somehow a white supremacist despite the fact he shot 3 people who were all white is also laughable. Dumb overzealous kid who got spooked to easily and will have to live with the consequences of his action. I have no problem with him being charged (although if they go for murder as opposed to manslaughter he will walk), what I have a problem with is the false narrative being pushed that he was looking to kill someone and that his motive was racism.
 
Not Quilty..!!! should of taken out more of you commie bastards....!!!
Look who is talking you COWARD!!!!!! The last I heard Cuba was a Communist country. So that probably makes you more of a Communist then any of us!!!!
 
He killed people trying to kill him. It was after curfew so no one technically should have been there. The people who were trying to murder him were out looking for trouble. They had guns and weapons and were actively destroying a city.
Its funny they all look like you but you will blame it on BLM. He will get what he deserves trust me.
 
Your such a racist loser. You dont know what I look like and who cares...oh you do...a racist POS.

I hope he does get what he deserves but it's not a murder conviction.
I dont want to know what you look like but I know what you are. POS racist
Yes they look just like you. Where is your skateboard POS
 
This narrative of he went out looking for murder is just patently false. He was defending a car dealership (and I agree a minor has no business doing this) and upon leaving was attacked by rioters. The narrative that he is somehow a white supremacist despite the fact he shot 3 people who were all white is also laughable. Dumb overzealous kid who got spooked to easily and will have to live with the consequences of his action. I have no problem with him being charged (although if they go for murder as opposed to manslaughter he will walk), what I have a problem with is the false narrative being pushed that he was looking to kill someone and that his motive was racism.
It's more than a narrative. He killed two people by carrying a firearm he wasn't supposed have. This isn't manslaughter. That is a crazy assertion. He went looking for trouble and found it. Hell, if he were black he would probably be dead.
 
Look who is talking you COWARD!!!!!! The last I heard Cuba was a Communist country. So that probably makes you more of a Communist then any of us!!!!

I don't think so pendejo... You wont see me kneeling during the anthem like you pos democrats..
And by the way .. Im a very proud U.S citizen and will cast my vote for Trump...
 
He's a piece of shit thug who beats on women. There is no defending him. I see others like to point out past criminal records when police kill people so please include his. There's video of him sicker punching a female that's arguing with another female. Long story short he went looking for confrontations and found them. Now he'll spend the best years and possibly the rest of his life worrying about being someones bitch. Im sure he'll join a aryian/white power group or some such bullshit while incarcerated but they fuxk each other in the ass all the time so yeah he's got some HARD nights and days in front and (pun intended)behind him as well.
 
Who disputes the FACTS I posted. We can be civil and just discuss the facts without vitriol.
 
It's more than a narrative. He killed two people by carrying a firearm he wasn't supposed have. This isn't manslaughter. That is a crazy assertion. He went looking for trouble and found it. Hell, if he were black he would probably be dead.
Do you mean dead like Tony Timpa, Daniel Shaver, LeVoy Finicum, or Justine Damond? Oh wait they were all white and were just some of the nearly 2x's the number of whites killed by police each year compared to blacks getting killed by police. You may believe your lies but smart people look at facts.
 
It's more than a narrative. He killed two people by carrying a firearm he wasn't supposed have. This isn't manslaughter. That is a crazy assertion. He went looking for trouble and found it. Hell, if he were black he would probably be dead.
First of all murder typically involves an intent, and he was on site at the dealership for several hours without incident and did not fire upon anyone until he was attacked (read the NYT report on this, he was attacked). Wisconsin has stand your ground laws and if he were an adult carrying a firearm registered to him you could argue no charges would be filed, since he is a minor from out of state he cannot legally carry a firearm in public and hence the manslaughter charges. Don't get me wrong I think he is a chicken hawk incel who likes to parade around with guns, but the narrative that he was looking for trouble is just wrong. If he wanted to kill protesters than why didn't he grab some banana clips and just unload into to crowd. The kid fired 5 shots while being attacked and fleeing, not exactly the sign of a mass shooter, didn't even unload his clip, dozens more protesters around him, again if he went there to kill why aren't there bodies everywhere. I could care less if he ends up in prison, and I am very conservative pro 2nd amendment while also being very against open carry. The reason I don't like open carry is because of rubes like this kid who shit his pants while being chased, if he were an actual trained marksmen he would have stood his ground earlier and put a round in that hipsters leg and sent them scattering. The only problem I have with any of this is that the media are trying to portray him as some racist Trump supporter who went out looking for a mass shooting when reality is he was a shit head punk trying to be tough and he shit his pants the second an ounce of confrontation came his way.
 
So let's move on to the Play Stupid Games, Win Stupid Prizes section of Trumps America:

1. He was 17. It was illegal for him to possess that rifle. In his home state you have to be 21, in Wisconsin you have to be 18. This was crime one.
2. Crossing the state line with an illegally possessed weapon is a pretty big deal and a big fat number two on the crime list.
3. Wisconsin totally allows for the use of deadly force in self defense, but the caveat is that you can't be committing a crime while that use of force happens. Which we addressed above he was actively committing a crime by possessing that rifle.
4. Wisconsin has a Castle Doctrine. But you can only use deadly force if the perpetrators are in your dwelling or your place of business. For a place of business you have to own this, or be in charge of operations of the business. You can not just post up to protect a random business, also you can not chase people if they decide to retreat like this 17yo did. Wisconsin V. Charles L Chew is the case law. If you want to have a look.
5. Its not self defense when you get in your car with a rifle, drive 16 miles to another town, and walk the streets with a rifle.
He had every option to stay home but he chose to get involved in this situation with the plan to be involved in confrontation (hence the rifle) also in Wisconsin self defense law you can't be the instigator and then claim self defense.
He became the instigator the second he pursued.
I get it. The kid thought he was gonna be a hero and help out. But, reality is he made a large number of bad mistakes because he's 17 and has his face buried in what essentially amounts to propaganda everyday and can't tell the difference.
Now 2 people are dead and he's headed to jail.
This is what all those "shoot the protestors" comments create.
Here's a link to the Wisconsin laws im referring to and I'll post a link to his arrest story in the comments.
https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/939/III/48
I was told by @gferman not to start any race threads so I won’t involve myself here. More incorrect information used to prop up one sided narrative.
 
Who disputes the FACTS I posted. We can be civil and just discuss the facts without vitriol.

I know I sound like a broken record asking you to be better informed but here is an article I found in some alt right rag (LOL) that clearly lays out the sequence of events. The kid was attacked and returned fire, there is a good chance since he is a minor he walks. Also zero evidence of racial motive as he shot 3 white guys despite there being black protesters all around he could have also fired upon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GLFSTRM
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT