ADVERTISEMENT

Libs are pieces of trash and the reason is because

Liberalism is the AIDS of political ideologies and those who harbor its tenets suffer from a disease of the mind.

Liberalism seeks to corrode the foundations upon which this country was built.

Economics: replacing capitalism with its free market, with a socialist based economy where the government excessively regulates and redistributes wealth.

Social: roboticizing society into uniformity of thought, speech, and conduct so that the individual's fundamental rights are undermined; individual dissent is suppressed by labeling those individuals who dissent (or disagree) racists, bigots, homophobes, etc. There are plenty of libtard cucks on this Board who perfectly encapsulate this concept. Liberalism has manipulated minorities in this country for decades, turning them into nothing but pawns on their political chess board so that they can rack up votes, while creating a racial divide in this country through disgusting race identity poltics.

Legal: judicial activism which ignores the Constitution and its Amendments in favor of a mis-vested moral authority; laws are ignored in favor of academic theory and social justice as liberals see fit.

Liberals are a locust in this country. Fortunately, we have a great President who is giving liberals and their cesspool shit ideology the kick in the balls and punch in the face every day, week, and month. Liberals continue to demonstrate their own superior levels of toolness, douchebaggery, and a unique brand of pussiness that is the envy of none.

Trump Derangement Syndrome- there is no cure.
 
Last edited:
Always remember, the left has 3 distinct groups.

The Far Left - ideology socialism - main source of news MSNBC - never consider even looking at the other side - hate all things conservative - CD is the perfect example

Tweeners - ideology European socialism at best - main source of news MSNBC & CNN - glance at the other side occasionally for argument sake - hate all things President Trump - Cems is the perfect example

Old liberal party or moderates - ideology Democracy - main source of news CNN & some FOX - review both sides but are liberal - don't hate conservatism but feel we'd be better off leaning left - Lou is a good example

That said they will likely show up with the following take:

CD - he won't be happy and will degrade not only it but our President for sitting down with Kim

Cems - same as CD as anything good for President Trump is bad for him

Lou - will likely be hopeful that it will work out for everyone involved and will be willing to give the President praise if it works out

Let's see what happens
 
Always remember, the left has 3 distinct groups.

The Far Left - ideology socialism - main source of news MSNBC - never consider even looking at the other side - hate all things conservative - CD is the perfect example

Tweeners - ideology European socialism at best - main source of news MSNBC & CNN - glance at the other side occasionally for argument sake - hate all things President Trump - Cems is the perfect example

Old liberal party or moderates - ideology Democracy - main source of news CNN & some FOX - review both sides but are liberal - don't hate conservatism but feel we'd be better off leaning left - Lou is a good example

That said they will likely show up with the following take:

CD - he won't be happy and will degrade not only it but our President for sitting down with Kim

Cems - same as CD as anything good for President Trump is bad for him

Lou - will likely be hopeful that it will work out for everyone involved and will be willing to give the President praise if it works out

Let's see what happens

Do you really expect any of these losers to come in here? They all have egg on their faces today.
 
You could tell Lemonhead on CNN ( now the Canadian News Network) really hated to report on the meeting.I haven't seem him this unhappy since Nov 8 2016.Very somber and gloomy.Peace through strength.
 
I wish every lib would get arrested and shipped off to Somalia. Disgusting pieces of shits they all are.
 
You could tell Lemonhead on CNN ( now the Canadian News Network) really hated to report on the meeting.I haven't seem him this unhappy since Nov 8 2016.Very somber and gloomy.Peace through strength.

0-91.jpg
 
Always remember, the left has 3 distinct groups.

The Far Left - ideology socialism - main source of news MSNBC - never consider even looking at the other side - hate all things conservative - CD is the perfect example

Tweeners - ideology European socialism at best - main source of news MSNBC & CNN - glance at the other side occasionally for argument sake - hate all things President Trump - Cems is the perfect example

Old liberal party or moderates - ideology Democracy - main source of news CNN & some FOX - review both sides but are liberal - don't hate conservatism but feel we'd be better off leaning left - Lou is a good example

That said they will likely show up with the following take:

CD - he won't be happy and will degrade not only it but our President for sitting down with Kim

Cems - same as CD as anything good for President Trump is bad for him

Lou - will likely be hopeful that it will work out for everyone involved and will be willing to give the President praise if it works out

Let's see what happens

First of all, I can come up with categories for the right as well. With that said you are correct that I hope it works out.

However I'm not a fan of the results from yesterday. They give a promise to denuclearize at some unspecified time in the future. This has been promised before and obviously that promise has not been kept. Meanwhile we are stopping our military exercises on the Korean peninsula. So Trump takes the word of a regime that has lied for decades and in return they get something concrete and a comment from the president that eventually he would like to remove the troops from the south. It's great that Kim committed to returning remains of our soldiers. However, in my opinion, they got more out of the first round of talks than we did.

I give Trump credit for trying. Previous administrations of both parties failed to contain this problem. I hope Trump achieves the ultimate goal here but long way to go and north korea has given up zero so far. Not good for the "best negotiator ever." I expected some immediate concession on their side. Not ours.
 
First of all, I can come up with categories for the right as well. With that said you are correct that I hope it works out.

However I'm not a fan of the results from yesterday. They give a promise to denuclearize at some unspecified time in the future. This has been promised before and obviously that promise has not been kept. Meanwhile we are stopping our military exercises on the Korean peninsula. So Trump takes the word of a regime that has lied for decades and in return they get something concrete and a comment from the president that eventually he would like to remove the troops from the south. It's great that Kim committed to returning remains of our soldiers. However, in my opinion, they got more out of the first round of talks than we did.

I give Trump credit for trying. Previous administrations of both parties failed to contain this problem. I hope Trump achieves the ultimate goal here but long way to go and north korea has given up zero so far. Not good for the "best negotiator ever." I expected some immediate concession on their side. Not ours.

I don't think you are fully aware of the facts of the meeting. Not one sanction will be lifted until there is substantive progress on denuclearization. The extreme sanctions are killing his country and that's what brought him to the table.
 
I think you underestimate the concessions made prior to the meeting (released prisoners, dismantled nuke test site, easing of tension with SK) and overemphasized our suspension of military exercises. I do agree though, there’s a long way to go but hopefully it works out.

As for categories on the right They too have groups but I’ll leave that to you on thevleft to point out.

First of all, I can come up with categories for the right as well. With that said you are correct that I hope it works out.

However I'm not a fan of the results from yesterday. They give a promise to denuclearize at some unspecified time in the future. This has been promised before and obviously that promise has not been kept. Meanwhile we are stopping our military exercises on the Korean peninsula. So Trump takes the word of a regime that has lied for decades and in return they get something concrete and a comment from the president that eventually he would like to remove the troops from the south. It's great that Kim committed to returning remains of our soldiers. However, in my opinion, they got more out of the first round of talks than we did.

I give Trump credit for trying. Previous administrations of both parties failed to contain this problem. I hope Trump achieves the ultimate goal here but long way to go and north korea has given up zero so far. Not good for the "best negotiator ever." I expected some immediate concession on their side. Not ours.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobbie jo
I think you underestimate the concessions made prior to the meeting (released prisoners, dismantled nuke test site, easing of tension with SK) and overemphasized our suspension of military exercises. I do agree though, there’s a long way to go but hopefully it works out.

As for categories on the right They too have groups but I’ll leave that to you on thevleft to point out.

Released prisoners was obviously good but the fact that Kim got to meet with an American President was more than enough to repay that favor. As far dismantling the test site, it's been widely reported that it was nothing but propaganda. What they did will do nothing to stop or slow down their program. It's amazing how people on the right suddenly trust north korea at face value.
 
I don't think anyone trust them Lou, but are hopeful a real resolution can be obtained.

Released prisoners was obviously good but the fact that Kim got to meet with an American President was more than enough to repay that favor. As far dismantling the test site, it's been widely reported that it was nothing but propaganda. What they did will do nothing to stop or slow down their program. It's amazing how people on the right suddenly trust north korea at face value.
 
I don't think you are fully aware of the facts of the meeting. Not one sanction will be lifted until there is substantive progress on denuclearization. The extreme sanctions are killing his country and that's what brought him to the table.

I understand that. With that leverage why didn't Trump get one concession other than the vague promise to denuclearize at some unspecified time? Why didn't he get any concrete concession? I wish Trump well in this but I expected more concession from them and I suspect privately you all did as well. Not complete denuclearization but some step towards that.
 
Lou...just a thought. Do you think the actual concession of suspending the exercises could have been an agreement previously agreed to with China for their cooperation in this overall effort? In other words, perhaps there's more going on then we may know.

I understand that. With that leverage why didn't Trump get one concession other than the vague promise to denuclearize at some unspecified time? Why didn't he get any concrete concession? I wish Trump well in this but I expected more concession from them and I suspect privately you all did as well. Not complete denuclearization but some step towards that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dolcane
I don't think anyone trust them Lou, but are hopeful a real resolution can be obtained.

I'm hopeful as well. But reading these threads some are acting like this vague promise to denuclearize means something. They've given this false pledge several times. And it seems you believe they made a significant concession with the test site despite widespread reporting that it did nothing to even slow their program. Again I hope we get a resolution but so far they haven't conceded a damn thing in my view.
 
Lou...just a thought. Do you think the actual concession of suspending the exercises could have been an agreement previously agreed to with China for their cooperation in this overall effort? In other words, perhaps there's more going on then we may know.

Better not be. China would love nothing more than us not doing the exercises and eventually eliminating our presence in that part of the world, which Trump said publicly he would like to do at some point. That's a dangerous and stupid move if he does it. Your thoughts?
 
I take it for what it's worth but suggest any concession with a long term adversary is something to be recognized.

I'm hopeful as well. But reading these threads some are acting like this vague promise to denuclearize means something. They've given this false pledge several times. And it seems you believe they made a significant concession with the test site despite widespread reporting that it did nothing to even slow their program. Again I hope we get a resolution but so far they haven't conceded a damn thing in my view.
 
I heard today that troop reductions were off the table but like you, I feel our presence in the region is vital. That said, with technology advancing at the rate it is, there may come a day where our presence may not be needed but that's in the future.

Better not be. China would love nothing more than us not doing the exercises and eventually eliminating our presence in that part of the world, which Trump said publicly he would like to do at some point. That's a dangerous and stupid move if he does it. Your thoughts?
 
I heard today that troop reductions were off the table but like you, I feel our presence in the region is vital. That said, with technology advancing at the rate it is, there may come a day where our presence may not be needed but that's in the future.

Yes off the table right now. But Trump clearly signaled that it's a future possibility. That's a disturbing statement this early in the talks. That's an absolute disaster of a move if we have any interest in limiting China's power in the region
 
I take it for what it's worth but suggest any concession with a long term adversary is something to be recognized.

But there was no concession except from us. Unless of course you trust Kim's commitment to denuclearize at some unspecified time. Personally I don't until they show us some good faith effort which Trump failed to get him to commit to.
 
Lou you or I neither one knows what Trump got him to commit to .What we do know is that Trump said that sanctions would be increased if Kim hides his nukes.Sanctions ( tough ones ) and tough talk got him to the negotiating table -pretty sure that dropping his nuke program is like cutting off an arm .
Besides Clinton ,Bush and especially Obama aren't anywhere
near the talent of Donald Trump when it comes to negotiating deals. Next up Iran
 
I’m just not real sure suspending an exercise is that big a deal. In fact, the money saved can possibly go to areas hoping for some assistance. Like the wall....lol

But there was no concession except from us. Unless of course you trust Kim's commitment to denuclearize at some unspecified time. Personally I don't until they show us some good faith effort which Trump failed to get him to commit to.
 
I’m just not real sure suspending an exercise is that big a deal. In fact, the money saved can possibly go to areas hoping for some assistance. Like the wall....lol

It's not a single exercise. And yes it is a big deal. Those guys are there to help defend south Korea. If they aren't training and conducting exercises then there is a risk they won't be ready if something happens. In my opinion not a small deal. Maybe you guys think it's no big deal. I disagree especially when you get zero in return
 
Lou, I’m not sure of your background but I assure you exercises happen all the time. We’ll be fine.

It's not a single exercise. And yes it is a big deal. Those guys are there to help defend south Korea. If they aren't training and conducting exercises then there is a risk they won't be ready if something happens. In my opinion not a small deal. Maybe you guys think it's no big deal. I disagree especially when you get zero in return
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreakingCane
Lou, I’m not sure of your background but I assure you exercises happen all the time. We’ll be fine.

I know they do. But not on the Korean peninsula. Our president committed to not conducting them.
 
Lou, I’m not sure of your background but I assure you exercises happen all the time. We’ll be fine.

I also have to say I'm surprised you are buying the bullshit. You know damn well they gave up nothing. Come on man. We all want this process to succeed but you know Kim got more than Trump in this summit. Im guessing you don't have the courage to post it here but you're a smart guy from what I can tell. You know the truth.
 
Lou where in the Hell do you think Japan is ? Next to Wyoming ? Japan is only 500 miles from South Korea - it is in the region- South Korea has an army
with modern weapons supplied by us.I say we withdraw when we see Kim has denuked to our
satisfaction.
We have given up ZERO publicly- they still have sanctions- Kim has promised to denuke -he has released the 3 Americans-he has promised to send back remains of American troops lost in the Korean war -by the way my Uncle Andy was a pilot lost over North Korea in 1951 in a B29-
Trump is not Obama-his red line is real
 
Lol...you don’t need courage to post on a board.

I think you’re overestimating the exercises by a long shot and again failing to acknowledge what they have already done.

I also have to say I'm surprised you are buying the bullshit. You know damn well they gave up nothing. Come on man. We all want this process to succeed but you know Kim got more than Trump in this summit. Im guessing you don't have the courage to post it here but you're a smart guy from what I can tell. You know the truth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreakingCane
Lou where in the Hell do you think Japan is ? Next to Wyoming ? Japan is only 500 miles from South Korea - it is in the region- South Korea has an army
with modern weapons supplied by us.I say we withdraw when we see Kim has denuked to our
satisfaction.
We have given up ZERO publicly- they still have sanctions- Kim has promised to denuke -he has released the 3 Americans-he has promised to send back remains of American troops lost in the Korean war -by the way my Uncle Andy was a pilot lost over North Korea in 1951 in a B29-
Trump is not Obama-his red line is real

I don't need a geography lesson. I never questioned Japan's proximity to the Korean peninsula. You want our troops out. I disagree. Our presence in that part of the world is vital. China would love nothing more than for us to leave. So if we want to limit China's control and influence over that region we need to be there. Apparently you don't care about China gaining more power. I do.

And we have given something up that Kim wanted and that was to stop the exercises that are meant to prepare our troops for any conflict on the peninsula. In return we get a vague commitment to denuclearize at some unspecified time in the future. Nothing tangible at all. Sorry not impressed. Take the Trump glasses off for one minute and think. They got something tangible and we didn't.

Now as far as soldier remains and hostages those are obviously good things and I credit Trump for getting them done. But I think giving a thug dictator a summit with an American President was more than enough to repay that favor. These were good developments but they do nothing towards denuclearization.
 
What do you think about Obama kissing Castro"s ass --? Or giving pallets of $$$ to Iran and giving them their 5 terrorists back for one American ( Bergdahl) - you forget TOUGH ECONOMIC SANCTIONS remain on North Korea and if they don't abide the sanctions will get tougher -yes of course China is a player in this -they've actually been a big help to us - probably has a lot to do with leverage for favorable trade with the USA--next up Iran
And Lou glad that you know Japan is an Asian country and real close to South Korea-you'd be surprised how many people don't know
 
First of all, I can come up with categories for the right as well. With that said you are correct that I hope it works out.

However I'm not a fan of the results from yesterday. They give a promise to denuclearize at some unspecified time in the future. This has been promised before and obviously that promise has not been kept. Meanwhile we are stopping our military exercises on the Korean peninsula. So Trump takes the word of a regime that has lied for decades and in return they get something concrete and a comment from the president that eventually he would like to remove the troops from the south. It's great that Kim committed to returning remains of our soldiers. However, in my opinion, they got more out of the first round of talks than we did.

I give Trump credit for trying. Previous administrations of both parties failed to contain this problem. I hope Trump achieves the ultimate goal here but long way to go and north korea has given up zero so far. Not good for the "best negotiator ever." I expected some immediate concession on their side. Not ours.

Ok but props to Obama and Kerry for giving Iran a path to Nukes?

Double Standard.
 
Ok but props to Obama and Kerry for giving Iran a path to Nukes?

Double Standard.

Bring it back to Obama whenever you can't argue facts. Same play over and over.

Let me ask would you rather a deal similar to the Iran deal with north korea or what Trump got the other day? Before you answer and look stupid you may want to read what is actually in the Iran deal. Answer honestly.
 
DJT, one thing is certain....If this had been a democratic president the GOP caucus would be pulling their hair out. That's just for starters. POTUS Obama couldn't get things off the ground because the house majority limited, underfunded what he & his administration tried to initiate. The AHCA was underfunded by Paul Ryan when he withheld $26B from the AHCA.
Obamas request to fund Benghazi was underfunded by $128M. Also underfunded were the Military, NSA.
But since we now have a repuglican POTUS there is unlimited funding for the Singapore summit; another photo op for the GOP caucus, trying to get Americans to believe they carry the bigger stick.
 
What do you think about Obama kissing Castro"s ass --? Or giving pallets of $$$ to Iran and giving them their 5 terrorists back for one American ( Bergdahl) - you forget TOUGH ECONOMIC SANCTIONS remain on North Korea and if they don't abide the sanctions will get tougher -yes of course China is a player in this -they've actually been a big help to us - probably has a lot to do with leverage for favorable trade with the USA--next up Iran
And Lou glad that you know Japan is an Asian country and real close to South Korea-you'd be surprised how many people don't know

Nice change of direction by bringing up Obama. Shocking that would try that tactic. Haha.

Now back to Trump and North Korea. You said you want the troops out of South Korea. Are you not concerned about China expanding their control and influence in the region if we pull our presence out? You really think that's a good idea? If so, why?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT