Maxine Waters - calls for violating curfews - tells protestors they are not protesting hard enough.
- Thread starter central17
- Start date
If Republicans had balls they would force her to be stripped of all her committees. She loves inciting violence.
They don’t know how to play the Libs game
She is causing more problems. If the Democrats were responsible they would tell her to STFU but they aren't. She isn't the brightest but her constituents think she is. Republicans need to work on defeating her when she's up for reelection . Dig up dirt on her or make up shit like the Libs do, people are gullible.
They’d have her removed from office as she’s shown a pattern of this type of behavior.
She is classless and as ignorant & crooked as they come..
After her calls to be more confrontational there was a drive by shooting at the MN National Guard.
According to lib rules she is responsible. Insurrection.
www.twincities.com
According to lib rules she is responsible. Insurrection.
National Guard security team target of drive-by shooting early Sunday
A neighborhood security team made up of Minnesota National Guard members and Minneapolis Police Department officers was the target of a drive-by shooting early Sunday morning in North Minneapolis. …
www.twincities.com
I’m sure the democrat state run media will be reporting on this insurrection ASAP.
More about a person that consistently spreads hatred.
Certain Dumb posters on this board always talk about those that promote insurrections are criminals?
Waters told the L.A. Times in May 1992 that “riot is the voice of the unheard.” She openly embraced the term “insurrection” as a substitute for “riot” in a 1992 interview with Katie Couric. A quarter-century later, in an anniversary interview with the Huffington Post, she again used the term “insurrection” to celebrate the implosion of Los Angeles and the stoking of anti-white, anti-Asian violence as a “defining moment in the way that black people resisted.”
Certain Dumb posters on this board always talk about those that promote insurrections are criminals?
Maxine Watters
Waters told the L.A. Times in May 1992 that “riot is the voice of the unheard.” She openly embraced the term “insurrection” as a substitute for “riot” in a 1992 interview with Katie Couric. A quarter-century later, in an anniversary interview with the Huffington Post, she again used the term “insurrection” to celebrate the implosion of Los Angeles and the stoking of anti-white, anti-Asian violence as a “defining moment in the way that black people resisted.”
Last edited:
She is a bad combination of arrogance and ignorance. She calls for violence in Minnesota, then goes back to her estate, outside of her district, in Cali to supervise the illegals working on her grounds and pool.Dirtbag.
A disgusting, vile, individual...
The sad part is that she ran against a smart independent thinking black man, a Navy veteran who actually lives in the district and actually. cares about South Central LA. Waters lives in a mansion outside her district in a neighborhood of rich white people.
In 2010 she was accused of three ethics violations in using her influence to benefit her crooked husband, son, and daughter. She beat the rap-surprise.
Waiting for the Comm Squad to defend her.
Last edited:
You all must have watched a different interview than the one I watched (or maybe, just maybe, you didn't watch the full 3:14 seconds.
Is interesting how folks on both the left and far right like to frame facts without actually hearing them. I watched every trump rally from 2015 forward, I knew the context of his quotes and saw how some stuff was misattributed to him and other stuff smoothed over despite him being clear on what his intent was. And yet, with Maxine, the same folks who translated Trump or said do as he did not as he said, make this intentional misapplication of her words.
Ask yourself, in the 60's would you have said this about John Lewis and Stokely Carmichael (cliff notes, folks on the conservative side of the spectrum said similar stuff of all black civil rights enthusiast) and if so where does that put you in history's view?
Is interesting how folks on both the left and far right like to frame facts without actually hearing them. I watched every trump rally from 2015 forward, I knew the context of his quotes and saw how some stuff was misattributed to him and other stuff smoothed over despite him being clear on what his intent was. And yet, with Maxine, the same folks who translated Trump or said do as he did not as he said, make this intentional misapplication of her words.
Ask yourself, in the 60's would you have said this about John Lewis and Stokely Carmichael (cliff notes, folks on the conservative side of the spectrum said similar stuff of all black civil rights enthusiast) and if so where does that put you in history's view?
I didn't watch over three minutes of her ranting about confrontation in Minnesota. Who would? Interview?
Cool with me, I typically watch source material before I comment, if you have an agenda that won't matter I get it.
My simple philosophy....If Maxine is for it, I'm against it and visa versa....
I watched her rant in the street about amping up confrontation. when they are already burning, looting, and firing at National Guard troops. What's next? I'm certainly not the only person who thought it was irresponsible. The judge chastised her. She has a history. I did not watch an interview.
Last edited:
Chauvin's defense called for a mistrial due to Maxine Waters comments. The judge turned it down, but did say, and I paraphrase, her comments were abhorent and not consistent with the constitutional oath taken by a congress person.
If ruled guilty (IMO he is) there will likely be reasonable cause for an appeal. All because Maxine can't keep her mouth shut.
If ruled guilty (IMO he is) there will likely be reasonable cause for an appeal. All because Maxine can't keep her mouth shut.
Last edited:
Prof Alan Dershowitz of Harvard Law School, a liberal Democrat, described Waters actions in Minnesota as identical to KKK tactics designed to intimidate juries during the Jim Crow days. Harsh criticism.
Simply said, but TRUTH, if Breaking gets this why not the rest of us? And we don't, 'that's the rub'. Their approach, 'anything goes'. Ours, well we must must be straightforward and right and fair and surely that always wins. Wrong. These mother fukcers will do anything to defeat us. That's because their objectives are to have the price paid by all other them themselves. They justify this thinking by ignoring logic. They don't even know that that is what they are doing. Basically they're not evil people, just impressionable...you know, sounds good must be true...but it's not!
BreakingCane fukcing gets this where the fukc are the rest of you Conservatives.
Conservatives are controlled by the fairness doctrine and we're fighting street fighters willing to give up all...as long as it's your all, not theirs. Can we muster the passion needed? The future of our great republic is in the balance.
Spin it anyway u want Maxine Waters has 000 intelligence a racist not to mention a crook...
If we take the parties out of this and look purely at the people , Maxine Waters, Majorie Greene, Omar, Thalib, Pressley, are incendiary politicians. Include the gal from Colorado whose name escapes me at the moment. They are all cut from the same cloth. I am not sure about their convictions however sure about their desire to grab headlines.
I have an article you might find self revealing. Here's an excerpt that describes right wing nutjobs like you to a T.
Hodson and Busseri (2012) found in a correlational study that lower intelligence in childhood is predictive of greater racism in adulthood, with this effect being mediated (partially explained) through conservative ideology. They also found poor abstract reasoning skills were related to homophobic attitudes, mediated through authoritarianism and low levels of intergroup contact.
What this study, and those before it, suggest is not necessarily that all liberals are geniuses and all conservatives are ignorant. Rather, it makes conclusions based on averages of groups. The idea is that for those who lack a cognitive ability to grasp the complexities of our world, strict-right wing ideologies may be more appealing. Brian Nosek explained it for the Huffington Post as follows, “Ideologies get rid of the messiness and impose a simple solution. So, it may not be surprising that people with less cognitive capacity will be attracted to simplifying ideologies.
Do Racism, Conservatism, and Low I.Q. Go Hand in Hand?
According to studies, right-wing ideologies are associated with greater prejudicial attitudes.
His life didn’t matter, and it shows the hypocrisy of it all.
There will be an appeal of his conviction, and her rant will be the first piece of evidence introduced.
Psychology Today- impressive scientific publication right up there with New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of American Medical Assoc., and The Lancet. Joke. What's next, People Magazine?I have an article you might find self revealing. Here's an excerpt that describes right wing nutjobs like you to a T.
Hodson and Busseri (2012) found in a correlational study that lower intelligence in childhood is predictive of greater racism in adulthood, with this effect being mediated (partially explained) through conservative ideology. They also found poor abstract reasoning skills were related to homophobic attitudes, mediated through authoritarianism and low levels of intergroup contact.
What this study, and those before it, suggest is not necessarily that all liberals are geniuses and all conservatives are ignorant. Rather, it makes conclusions based on averages of groups. The idea is that for those who lack a cognitive ability to grasp the complexities of our world, strict-right wing ideologies may be more appealing. Brian Nosek explained it for the Huffington Post as follows, “Ideologies get rid of the messiness and impose a simple solution. So, it may not be surprising that people with less cognitive capacity will be attracted to simplifying ideologies.
Do Racism, Conservatism, and Low I.Q. Go Hand in Hand?
According to studies, right-wing ideologies are associated with greater prejudicial attitudes.www.psychologytoday.com
Last edited:
