ADVERTISEMENT

Ruth Buzzi Ginsburg

Castillo147

SuperCane
Gold Member
Dec 3, 2008
8,660
14,442
113
35
Valrico , FL
has finally hung up those radical liberal gloves of hers... RIP... her wishes are that the next president choose her replacement... unfortunately, what she wishes doesn't fvcking matter... TRUMP and Cocaine Mitch will RAM Amy Coney Barrett right on through, solidifying the Supreme Court for decades.... and libs, dont look now... Breyer is 82...... Lol.. lol
 
has finally hung up those radical liberal gloves of hers... RIP... her wishes are that the next president choose her replacement... unfortunately, what she wishes doesn't fvcking matter... TRUMP and Cocaine Mitch will RAM Amy Coney Barrett right on through, solidifying the Supreme Court for decades.... and libs, dont look now... Breyer is 82...... Lol.. lol
Excellent OP Castillo!
 
has finally hung up those radical liberal gloves of hers... RIP... her wishes are that the next president choose her replacement... unfortunately, what she wishes doesn't fvcking matter... TRUMP and Cocaine Mitch will RAM Amy Coney Barrett right on through, solidifying the Supreme Court for decades.... and libs, dont look now... Breyer is 82...... Lol.. lol

Trump just might get another 2 once elected....
 
has finally hung up those radical liberal gloves of hers... RIP... her wishes are that the next president choose her replacement... unfortunately, what she wishes doesn't fvcking matter... TRUMP and Cocaine Mitch will RAM Amy Coney Barrett right on through, solidifying the Supreme Court for decades.... and libs, dont look now... Breyer is 82...... Lol.. lol

This is why the Dems will increase the amount of justices by 4 during the Biden administration and put 4 Dem friendly new Justices on the bench.
 
They dont like they are losing out so now they want to change the rules and add more judges. We have had to endure this womans liberal thinking for decades. Millions are dead because of her beliefs. Now we might be able to stop the killing and the libs are losing there mind.
 
They dont like they are losing out so now they want to change the rules and add more judges. We have had to endure this womans liberal thinking for decades. Millions are dead because of her beliefs. Now we might be able to stop the killing and the libs are losing there mind.

That's what happens when you cheat by depriving a sitting President of nominating and voting on his nominee, then pretend it never happened by doing the opposite 4 years later. Sooner or later, the Dems will regain power in the Presidency and Congress at the same time and pack the courts with Dems by changing the laws. You reap what you sow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zackbear
That's what happens when you cheat by depriving a sitting President of nominating and voting on his nominee, then pretend it never happened by doing the opposite 4 years later. Sooner or later, the Dems will regain power in the Presidency and Congress at the same time and pack the courts with Dems by changing the laws. You reap what you sow.

I guess we each just keep adding and subtracting justices each time a new party gets elected. Makes sense.
 
That's what happens when you cheat by depriving a sitting President of nominating and voting on his nominee, then pretend it never happened by doing the opposite 4 years later. Sooner or later, the Dems will regain power in the Presidency and Congress at the same time and pack the courts with Dems by changing the laws. You reap what you sow.

Plus, I believe they had a majority in 2016 and could deny the vote. The dems would have done it back then and they sure as hell would do it now. Never understand why libs are so eager to murder babies by the millions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: doerunn and mahb
Plus, I believe they had a majority in 2016 and could deny the vote. The dems would have done it back then and they sure as hell would do it now. Never understand why libs are so eager to murder babies by the millions.

Likewise a majority of Americans don't understand why a bunch of ageing, obese males with ED are so fixated on controlling women's bodies through the courts.
 
That's a ridiculous talking point. Woman can do as they please with there body. A baby is a separate human being with it's on body, DNA, mind and soul. It's not part of there body.

Not if you're controlling a woman's body.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zackbear
So a woman controls her body by murdering another human being? Makes sense. Does the female baby have no choice about her body? She doesnt get to choose. Amazing how people have been brainwashed into believing the murder of infants is acceptable. Some things never change. We used to have another Democrat supported institution in this country that's very similar. During slavery people were convinced slaves weren't humans, didnt deserve the dignity of life. That they were the property of there "owners" and they could be dealt with how the pleased. Now we have abortion, babies arent humans, mothers can do as they please with them.
 
This is why the Dems will increase the amount of justices by 4 during the Biden administration and put 4 Dem friendly new Justices on the bench.

Then they can go to the supreme court thats its unconstitutional and get it over turned..
Check-mate..!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: doerunn
So a woman controls her body by murdering another human being? Makes sense. Does the female baby have no choice about her body? She doesnt get to choose. Amazing how people have been brainwashed into believing the murder of infants is acceptable. Some things never change. We used to have another Democrat supported institution in this country that's very similar. During slavery people were convinced slaves weren't humans, didnt deserve the dignity of life. That they were the property of there "owners" and they could be dealt with how the pleased. Now we have abortion, babies arent humans, mothers can do as they please with them.

That's not how the majority of people in the civilized world see it. Abortions will take place whether they are legal or not, so it would be pointless to make women go through the old coat hanger method when they have access to modern medical facilities.

Also, Conservatives who feign moral outrage about "the unborn baby" don't have any moral leverage to do so given that they are usually the same ones who are against providing economic opportunities and basic health services to women, not to mention moaning about how kids in poor families don't have a decent set of parents to raise them - because they themselves want to force (primarily) poor women to have kids without the resources to raise them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zackbear
That's not how the majority of people in the civilized world see it. Abortions will take place whether they are legal or not, so it would be pointless to make women go through the old coat hanger method when they have access to modern medical facilities.

Also, Conservatives who feign moral outrage about "the unborn baby" don't have any moral leverage to do so given that they are usually the same ones who are against providing economic opportunities and basic health services to women, not to mention moaning about how kids in poor families don't have a decent set of parents to raise them - because they themselves want to force (primarily) poor women to have kids without the resources to raise them.

So you believe if a child is born into poor economic circumstances they have no value and should just be killed. Got it.
 
That's not how the majority of people in the civilized world see it. Abortions will take place whether they are legal or not, so it would be pointless to make women go through the old coat hanger method when they have access to modern medical facilities.

Also, Conservatives who feign moral outrage about "the unborn baby" don't have any moral leverage to do so given that they are usually the same ones who are against providing economic opportunities and basic health services to women, not to mention moaning about how kids in poor families don't have a decent set of parents to raise them - because they themselves want to force (primarily) poor women to have kids without the resources to raise them.

No matter what ridiculous talking point you can think of the bottom line is you support the murder of another innocent vulnerable human being. Therefore you are wrong. I don't care what the "majority" of people feel. The majority of people are often wrong. The majority of people once thought the world was flat, slavery civilized, and on and on. I will be on the side of life. You can choose death.
 
No matter what ridiculous talking point you can think of the bottom line is you support the murder of another innocent vulnerable human being. Therefore you are wrong. I don't care what the "majority" of people feel. The majority of people are often wrong. The majority of people once thought the world was flat, slavery civilized, and on and on. I will be on the side of life. You can choose death.

What you just wrote is also a talking point.

Irrespective of your personal view (which you're entitled to), a majority of the people in this country aren't religious fanatics seeking to use the topic of abortion to control the female body. These aren't the 80s anymore and people are generally less religious as time goes by, so maybe lose the religious dogma and get with the times so you no longer have to pretend you care about the bedroom lives of people you've never met.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zackbear
This is why the Dems will increase the amount of justices by 4 during the Biden administration and put 4 Dem friendly new Justices on the bench.

Then Reps take over and increase the justices to 17? Then Demo's to 21. Then the USA becomes Venezuela. AOC is named President for Life.
 
What you just wrote is also a talking point.

Irrespective of your personal view (which you're entitled to), a majority of the people in this country aren't religious fanatics seeking to use the topic of abortion to control the female body. This isn't the 80s anymore and people are generally less religious as time goes by, so maybe lose the religious dogma and get with the times so you no longer have to pretend you care about the bedroom lives of people you've never met.

No talking point, I didnt mention God or religion once. You have no argument so you are pretending to put words in my mouth. Like I said earlier...woman are free to do what they want with their body and in the bedroom. I could not care less. The baby is not their body...again a distinct individual with it's own mind, DNA and body. The baby is not the mother and the mother is not the baby. She has no right to kill a baby in the womb then she does 10 minutes after it was born.
 
Then Reps take over and increase the justices to 17? Then Demo's to 21. Then the USA becomes Venezuela. AOC is named President for Life.

The Reps will never regain power if the Dems increase to 13 because the Dem picks will reverse Citizens United ruling, which will make it next to impossible for Corporations and Pacs to buy their way into funding campaigns.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zackbear
What you just wrote is also a talking point.

Irrespective of your personal view (which you're entitled to), a majority of the people in this country aren't religious fanatics seeking to use the topic of abortion to control the female body. These aren't the 80s anymore and people are generally less religious as time goes by, so maybe lose the religious dogma and get with the times so you no longer have to pretend you care about the bedroom lives of people you've never met.

The USA is in far more danger of Democrat's making the country a Communist Dictatorship than a Conservative SCOTUS banning abortion. Abortion is nothing but a Red Herring issue Demo's use to frighten ignorant people into giving them full control.
 
No talking point, I didnt mention God or religion once. You have no argument so you are pretending to put words in my mouth. Like I said earlier...woman are free to do what they want with their body and in the bedroom. I could not care less. The baby is not their body...again a distinct individual with it's own mind, DNA and body. The baby is not the mother and the mother is not the baby. She has no right to kill a baby in the womb then she does 10 minutes after it was born.

The fetus and eventually baby come from the woman's body so by simple logic, it is a part of her body.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zackbear
It's truly scary see how shallow ad self serving Raoul/Liberal logic/rationalization takes them. Everything they say is PC and a lie, as toward there True intent and desire. You cant build a wall high enough or have enough conservative Scotus, because they have No respect for Rule of Law Not even The Constitution, and will just change it until only they win and win forever.
I wish they would all just pool their $$$ , since they are so evolved, and Buy themselves an Island Country and show us How its Done. LOL Maybe Hollywood can front them the Crew from Survivor Island
 
It's truly scary see how shallow ad self serving Raoul/Liberal logic/rationalization takes them. Everything they say is PC and a lie, as toward there True intent and desire. You cant build a wall high enough or have enough conservative Scotus, because they have No respect for Rule of Law Not even The Constitution, and will just change it until only they win and win forever.
I wish they would all just pool their $$$ , since they are so evolved, and Buy themselves an Island Country and show us How its Done. LOL Maybe Hollywood can front them the Crew from Survivor Island

In English please.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zackbear
The Reps will never regain power if the Dems increase to 13 because the Dem picks will reverse Citizens United ruling, which will make it next to impossible for Corporations and Pacs to buy their way into funding campaigns.
The Citizens United ruling is one of the worst things to happen to America in my lifetime and I will never understand the logic behind saying that corporations are people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zackbear and Raoul2
Wow Raoul really, is it a blind thing ? You can magnify the contents of the page, or is it your just too high and mighty elite to stoop to such a level ? Thank you though for proving/making my point. 😉
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raoul2
Raoul2-D2 is an idiot who needs to move to Canada. Hopefully Trump’s re-election is a catalyst for that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: El Cubano
That's what happens when you cheat by depriving a sitting President of nominating and voting on his nominee, then pretend it never happened by doing the opposite 4 years later. Sooner or later, the Dems will regain power in the Presidency and Congress at the same time and pack the courts with Dems by changing the laws. You reap what you sow.
Bull shit, the libs are eventually going to try and pack the court regardless when they eventually get their chance in maybe four years from now. Come to think if it, maybe trump should pack the court in 2021 since you commies are such fans of packing the court.
 
Bull shit, the libs are eventually going to try and pack the court regardless when they eventually get their chance in maybe four years from now. Come to think if it, maybe trump should pack the court in 2021 since you commies are such fans of packing the court.

You need Congress to pack the court and the Republicans won't be winning the house back anytime soon. The Dems on the other hand have a pretty good chance of winning the White House and reclaiming the Senate 6 weeks from now, which would give them control of the executive and legislative, which is all that's needed to increase the number of Supreme Court justices. This is long over due and needs to happen asap. Same with statehood for DC and Puerto Rico.
 
You need Congress to pack the court and the Republicans won't be winning the house back anytime soon. The Dems on the other hand have a pretty good chance of winning the White House and reclaiming the Senate 6 weeks from now, which would give them control of the executive and legislative, which is all that's needed to increase the number of Supreme Court justices. This is long over due and needs to happen asap. Same with statehood for DC and Puerto Rico.

Since it's long overdue...if Trump wins and they hold the Senate you will be perfectly fine with the GOP increasing the number of justices? Is it only long overdue if the dems do it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: doerunn
Since it's long overdue...if Trump wins and they hold the Senate you will be perfectly fine with the GOP increasing the number of justices? Is it only long overdue if the dems do it?

You need the house as well. You won't have the house even if Trump somehow wins.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zackbear
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT