Statistical risk for COVID for the older middle aged
- Thread starter central17
- Start date
Wow, I’m so glad we destroyed the greatest economy ever for those odds.
That study was from June and was not peer reviewed and has not been peer reviewed. It’s a reprint and fake news OAN runs BS. Lol
UCLA, STANFORD study finds for average 50-64 year old, chances of dying from COVID-19 are 1 in 19.1 million!!! (Medrxiv.org) - (We) Are The News
OAN reports UCLA, STANFORD study finds for average 50-64 year old, chances of dying from COVID-19 are 1 in 19.1 million!!! study posted June 24, 2020. why is this news now? are they purposely hiding positive info from the American Public??? Disclaimer = (publishers are pussies, it is starting...
wearethene.ws
I wouldn’t be either. Unproven study reprinted and put out by OAN fake news. Oh and the daily mail. Lol.
Study came from UCLA and Stanford. Hardly bastions or conservative ideology. OAN was reporting a published and SOURCED study. Unlike the Atlantic (I am sure you call them unbiased and moderate) which is an absolute left wing rag. The Atlantic builds a hit piece on Trump based ENTIRELY by anonymous sources.
Just curious. Do you have a problem with the veracity of the Atlantic or do you find them credible?
Wait i thought it really was Obama’s economy and now suddenly it’s Trumps economy??? I can’t keep up with the Dems lies.
You post like the baby in your picture.
Tell us how higher taxes, more regulations will grow OUR economy during a pandemic.
No the Atlantic is also trash. I look at the science and this has not been approved and we have not heard anything else about it. No peer review no go.
I post like a baby. Thanks for the middle school comment. Taxes for the extremely wealthy yes. Regulations depends on what the regulations are. Some were over board with Obama some were not.
Similar threads
