Two clowns arguing and can't answer any questions. What has happened to this country?
The Circus Continues...
- Thread starter BreakingCane
- Start date
This is not an election between two clowns. This is an election between one of the most well qualified people to ever run for president who has political shortcomings and scandals that are normal and unremarkable for a career politician running against a sociopathic demagogue who thinks intelligence and fact are both things to be despised.
LOL "scandals that are normal and unremarkable"
Fact: Hillary took millions from countries that execute people like you.
You have an interesting yet peculiar definition of the word "fact". I think you meant to say "The Clinton Foundation" not "Hillary". If you did mean to say that, then yes, you would then be correct. The Clinton Foundation did accept millions of dollars in donations from nations with abhorrent human rights records. It is quite a shame they weren't able to get billions out of them instead as I rather prefer those countries simply go broke.
If she is so qualified, why can't she articulate how she will mprove upon the current admin? Why can't Trump provide details about his policies and answer question with more substance than,"it's gonna be real good"?
Well, first of all, don't assume that just because she DOESNT articulate that means she CANT. Can or can't aren't part of it, she's not going to. It is politically advantageous to ride obama's coattails as much as possible which includes avoiding saying things that infer he did a less than great job as president. Obama is a huge asset to her currently.
With that aside, she has articulated in great detail the ways in which she will "continue" to push the vision of hope obama began with. Really much of those plans are her own, but again it is advantageous to present as in line with obama. Her plans are very detailed, comprehensive, and reflect deep and nuanced thinking. One of her chief weaknesses as a candidate for office is her habit of drifting into too much deep policy talk during speeches and debates because most common voters don't wanna hear it. All of her stuff is on her website and very easy to access.
The answer to your last question is far simpler: because in stark contrast to Hillary, Trump has a disdain for details and deep intellectual engagement with policy. It is remarkable how extremely opposite these two are. You have Hillary on one side who is a mediocre bordering on bad campaigner for public office but has a history of excelling while actually in office, likely because she prefers the grind of dealing with policy and making things happen over what she sees as a waste of her time shaking people's hands and giving speeches every day for a year. People detect that and it comes off as she thinks she's superior. It's not good. But I can deal with it no problem. Then you have trump who seems to adore the campaign and the attention and fans and giving speeches to cheering crowds but would likely find himself in a special kind of misery if he were elected and had to then actually had to do the job.
Again, clowns. What has she excelled in? What has he done or will he do?
What has she excelled in? Virtually Everything she's ever done lol. Her approval rating as First Lady was one of the three highest in us history. Her approval rating as a us senator was one of the highest five for any sitting senator when she left office. Her approval rating as Secretary of State was the highest in the history of the country. If she was a male, she'd be up 15% in all the polls.
I get that people don't like her. Many of those people don't like her because they are bigots and she is a threat to them and their preferred way of life, many don't like her for legitimate reasons. People can disagree on policy issues like taxes and education policy and foreign relations. I agree with her on most of those things but I also recognize there's room for moral people to disagree and that's fine. I don't expect everyone to vote for her, but when people say things like she's a clown and comparable to Donald trump it really erodes at their credibility.
I get that people don't like her. Many of those people don't like her because they are bigots and she is a threat to them and their preferred way of life, many don't like her for legitimate reasons. People can disagree on policy issues like taxes and education policy and foreign relations. I agree with her on most of those things but I also recognize there's room for moral people to disagree and that's fine. I don't expect everyone to vote for her, but when people say things like she's a clown and comparable to Donald trump it really erodes at their credibility.
Hard to believe such a noble deep thinking sucessful politician would stoop so low as to pay people to attempt to incite riots at political rallies. When that issue was brought up last night she could not even attempt to explain it or deny it.
Wake with all due respect, are trying to get a job with MSNBC? She has done nothing but infused millions of dollars into to her bank account while being a public servant. I am in no way saying that Trump is the answer, but if you think things are good, God bless you.
So people who don't like both candidates are bigots? Wow. Obama was one of the least qualified and least experienced Presidents in recent memory, yet he got elected.
I'm not going to respond to people who read my post that says 2+2 = 4 then tell me I said 3+3= orange .
@e_cushing brought up a legitimate point. No answers?
Why did she lie about landing in Bosnia under sniper fire?
Why did she lie about a videotape being the cause for those savages attacking the consulate in Benghazi?
Why didn't she acquiesce to ambassador Stevens' requests for more security? Multiple western countries evacuated their embassies in Libya just prior to the attack that claimed ambassador Stevens' life, Germany was one, Great Britain may have been another. They did so because there was credible Intel that an attack was coming. Explain how her actions were the epitome of competence?
Why did she delete thousands of emails after those very emails were subpoenaed by Congress? Is this not criminal behavior?
I have many more, I'll wait for you to answer these before asking the rest.
More important for you is why do you think things happened that didn't actually happen? I don't answer hypothetical questions and I prefer to avoid getting into debates with people who don't bind their arguments by fact.
Are you serious? Your standard reply when you're trapped is " Bullshit!!! None of this ever happened" even though It's documented.
You're a joke.
Even @Big Pimpin Cane who is a die hard democrat thinks you sound ridiculous.
Bosnia lies piece.... unless The Washington Post is not believable.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...claim-of-landing-under-sniper-fire-in-bosnia/
Benghazi Videotape lies piece.... this from The Washington Times but if you google it there are plenty of others:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/oct/21/monica-crowley-hillary-clinton-benghazi-lies-and-v/
Benghazi Timeline lies piece.... from that Conservative bastion CBS News:
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/benghazi-timeline-how-the-attack-unfolded/
Deleted Emails Timeline... Washington Post again:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...emails-a-timeline-of-actions-and-regulations/
But yeah none of those things happened. Cause we know the media just loves to smear democrats like Clinton.
I was speaking in particular about this claim: "Why did she delete thousands of emails after those very emails were subpoenaed by Congress? Is this not criminal behavior?"
This did not happen. None of the links provided above demonstrate that it did. It is a fantasy. I prefer to not engage with people who are so susceptible to believing in fantasy.
This did not happen. None of the links provided above demonstrate that it did. It is a fantasy. I prefer to not engage with people who are so susceptible to believing in fantasy.
He doesn't even do the first b. Enjoys it too much. Doesn't want anything about the experience muted or muffled.
Thug u cites the GOP website ...and I'm the hack? Let me give you a hint: there's a reason the GOP website doesn't mention WHAT was being subpoenaed...there is an important reason why the GOP website omits that information, because their claim (and yours as well) falls apart once that information is included. But keep making fun of me for being gay because that's clearly relevant to this subpoena!
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
Transfer Portal Tracker: Players planning to depart from Miami in winter window
- Latest: BenjaminRivals
-