Originally posted by Azar:
Originally posted by FightinIbis:
Originally posted by Azar:
Notice the cold and callous attitude towards the lose of this young man's life. Not one bit on sympathy for the kid or his family. Notice the lack of consideration in the fact that this kid was simply walking home from the store and had his life take due to being profiled. Notice how none of these facts matters, it's all about the fckn law now.
I saw the comments from many of the same people who justify this murderous act calling for the death penalty for Mike Vick as soon as the charges were filed. There was no "wait for a trial" attitude in Mike's case. All they knew was that the precious dogs were hurt and wanted blood.
Regarding the OJ case, there was news report after news report calling OJ a murder. They literally tried and convicted this guy in every media outlet bar none before this case was ever brought to trial. Regardless of his acquittal, you can't convince one white person, at least that I've seen, that OJ is not a murder. If there is one on this site who thinks OJ did not do it, please speak up. I'd like to meet you because you are about as rare as a unicorn.
Somehow with the GZ case, the emphasis has now shifted to the specifics of "the law". Now we're carefully scrutinizing every little detail to create as many, what I call, distractions as possible. GZ did everything short of saying, I'm going to kill this N-word. He called him suspicious looking, said he looks to be on drugs(helluva an assumption), called him a coon, said they always get away, chased him after being told not to, and eventually killed an unarmed kid yet none of you see anything wrong with this because the law says he was not wrong. You now wanna cite the mind fckry of court room language that put the murder victim on trial vs the murder....And you wanna criticize the racial bias of the fans in Ala, La., very little difference when test day comes. There just a little more honest and forthcoming about how they feel....
Oh, I see...the "specifics of the law" don't matter. Thanks for proving my point...specifically.
UM
Posted from wireless.rivals.com
Did is matter to you with OJ? You're pretty quiet on that one. The law says he isn't a murderer but what do you say? Care to give an answer on that one? Then we can discuss this specifics of the law in more detail. Don't be a coward and avoid that question, lets see how consistent you are with the specifics of the law beliefs.
WTF are you even talking about? Your comparing the OJ case to the Trayvon Martin case? Where are the similarities? The fact that there are African American males involved? That is pretty much where it ends.
As far as the "law" is concerned, OJ was tried in front of a jury of his peers, had excellent representation...and an over zealous DA. That MIGHT be the second closest similarity to the two cases
What I "believed" happened was and is irrelevant...the "specifics of the law" were followed and the jury found him not guilty...so be it. Now a days it seems the majority of African Americans I have spoken to believe he did it...it doesn't change a thing though...the verdict was the verdict.
Your dire need to turn every situation involving an African American into racism, unless it is a success story, is your own problem. I choose to adhere to the legal system as it exists. While I can have my own opinion, it is irrelevant. Personally, I think Zimmerman went too far if you want to know the truth...he should have retreated and contacted the police.
That said...the DA folded under political pressure from the State Attorney, and much "higher" voices calling for Zimmerman's racist head...and charged him with crimes they simply couldn't prove...instead of seeking justice with a charge they might have been able to prove, such as involuntary manslaughter. Who do you blame for that? "The white man?"
Much like the OJ case, the system ran its course and the outcome was the outcome. Nobody wants to see a young man die of any color..or so I would like to believe, but it happens every day all over this country.
If you want to change the system, go for it...there are a lot of shortcomings for sure...but if the verdict had gone the other way, remember how satisfied you would have been that it worked and how different your posts on the situation would be...likely the type of posts made after the OJ case.
That is the difference here...I accept the system because I have no choice but to adhere to it, despite agreeing and seriously disagreeing with it at times. You accept the system when it works the way you believe it should...otherwise, it is all just racism.
This is the best system human beings have come up with to right perceived wrongs. We don't just place people in front of a firing squad without their day in court. How it goes from there is largely out of our control, absent our personal involvement...and even sometimes when we are involved.
Imperfect? Abso-fu@$-ing lotely ....but the best we have...
UM
Posted from wireless.rivals.com[/URL]