ADVERTISEMENT

2nd Amendment Fraud

cems52

cems52

SuperCane
Gold Member
Dec 22, 2006
25,532
6,657
113
Parkland, Florida
Said former Chief Justice Warren Burger who was appointed by former President Richard Nixon (R). Take a listen.



The founding fathers never intented for its citizens to bear military style weapons un-regulated. In fact wasn't the canon gun discussed and was not intended to be owned by the people at that time? Could they have anticipated mass killings 250 years ago?
 
cems52 said:
Said former Chief Justice Warren Burger who was appointed by former President Richard Nixon (R). Take a listen.

View embedded media


The founding fathers never intented for its citizens to bear military style weapons un-regulated. In fact wasn't the canon gun discussed and was not intended to be owned by the people at that time? Could they have anticipated mass killings 250 years ago?
Click to expand...
Justice Antonin Scalia would have vehemently disagreed...
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: orly 1022, Allied2651, grbcane and 4 others
cems52 said:
Said former Chief Justice Warren Burger who was appointed by former President Richard Nixon (R). Take a listen.

View embedded media


The founding fathers never intented for its citizens to bear military style weapons un-regulated. In fact wasn't the canon gun discussed and was not intended to be owned by the people at that time? Could they have anticipated mass killings 250 years ago?
Click to expand...
Are you saying that there were no mass killings back then?
 
  • Like
Reactions: orly 1022 and mahb
Heller is the law of the land
It’s precedent
It’s super precedent
It can’t be overturned lightly
So Scalia prevails over a long dead CJ whose views have NOT been adopted by the SCOTUS .
There is a private right to beat arms separate from any Militia language
So says 6 justices 🧑‍⚖️
 
  • Like
Reactions: mahb and grbcane
cems52 said:
Said former Chief Justice Warren Burger who was appointed by former President Richard Nixon (R). Take a listen.

View embedded media


The founding fathers never intented for its citizens to bear military style weapons un-regulated. In fact wasn't the canon gun discussed and was not intended to be owned by the people at that time? Could they have anticipated mass killings 250 years ago?
Click to expand...

The founding fathers were masters of the English language. That’s why they put the word infringe in the second amendment.

After escaping the brutal English government, they had the foresight to know there would be authoritarians like the democrat party, who would try to disarm the public.

Back in their day, they didn’t have the luxury of calling 911 when bad people attacked. Good guys with guns, had to deal with bad guys that had guns.

People had guns to protect their person and property from bad people. Guns were always used for more than hunting and militias

An armed public has citizens, an unarmed public has subjects.
 
  • Like
Reactions: orly 1022, ZEKEMUG, Allied2651 and 1 other person
cems52 said:
Said former Chief Justice Warren Burger who was appointed by former President Richard Nixon (R). Take a listen.

View embedded media


The founding fathers never intented for its citizens to bear military style weapons un-regulated. In fact wasn't the canon gun discussed and was not intended to be owned by the people at that time? Could they have anticipated mass killings 250 years ago?
Click to expand...
Probably not anticipated mass killings back then. But what they did realize is that government left unchecked always become a tyranny.
110,000,000 murdered by their own governments in the last century.
What they didn’t anticipate was men having babies. And giving puberty blockers to children letting them decide which sex they wanna be.
Or partial birth abortions. But here we are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: orly 1022, ZEKEMUG, grbcane and 3 others
genghiscane said:
Probably not anticipated mass killings back then. But what they did realize is that government left unchecked always become a tyranny.
110,000,000 murdered by their own governments in the last century.
What they didn’t anticipate was men having babies. And giving puberty blockers to children letting them decide which sex they wanna be.
Or partial birth abortions. But here we are.
Click to expand...
Nice deflection but the discussion is too many guns in America. Can you dig it?
 
grbcane said:
The founding fathers were masters of the English language. That’s why they put the word infringe in the second amendment.

After escaping the brutal English government, they had the foresight to know there would be authoritarians like the democrat party, who would try to disarm the public.

Back in their day, they didn’t have the luxury of calling 911 when bad people attacked. Good guys with guns, had to deal with bad guys that had guns.

People had guns to protect their person and property from bad people. Guns were always used for more than hunting and militias

An armed public has citizens, an unarmed public has subjects.
Click to expand...
Your gun fantasy is about to come to an end. The founding fathers never envisioned the right to bear arms meant killing children.
 
cems52 said:
Your gun fantasy is about to come to an end. The founding fathers never envisioned the right to bear arms meant killing children.
Click to expand...
The founding fathers had much more wisdom than today’s current politicians.

Our modern politicians don‘t have an ounce of their wisdom, honor or humility.

The founding fathers understood history.

They knew it, and knew exactly what they were doing.

They wrote the second amendment for people who thought like you.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: krvanness
grbcane said:
The founding fathers had much more wisdom than today’s current politicians.

Our modern politicians don‘t have an ounce of their wisdom, honor or humility.

The founding fathers understood history.

They knew it, and knew exactly what they were doing.

They wrote the second amendment for people who thought like you.
Click to expand...
So you ok with mowing down children with military weapons?
 
cems52 said:
You support the public owning military style weapons to kill children but you question my intelligence? WTF
Click to expand...
You support ripping babies out of the womb at anytime and killing them , then selling their baby parts. Fact.
 
cems52 said:
You support forcing a rape or incest victim to carry her baby to term. WTF!!!
Click to expand...
You’re the only one who can be proven to support the direct actions that slaughter innocent babies.

Babies that feel the pain while being dismembered. You support it even in the ninth month.

You directly support their slaughter, so you’ve lost the moral high ground, and have disqualified yourself from judging anything.
 
cems52 said:
Said former Chief Justice Warren Burger who was appointed by former President Richard Nixon (R). Take a listen.

View embedded media


The founding fathers never intented for its citizens to bear military style weapons un-regulated. In fact wasn't the canon gun discussed and was not intended to be owned by the people at that time? Could they have anticipated mass killings 250 years ago?
Click to expand...
please cry more
 
The founders knew that armed citizens are important to prevent a tyrannical government from abusing power. The fascists in the Biden regime have been limited only by the fear of millions of armed Americans . There have to be checks and balances on the power of government.
But its understandable to be upset that an 18 yo who essentially broadcast his psychosis was able to obtain the powerful weapons he used to do horrible things. No mention of a father in his life which is a common problem.
Better software to analyze social media before people are allowed to own a gun should be instituted. Better security in schools and public areas where people are not allowed to carry guns.
But if a psychopath is hell bent on causing destruction its very hard to prevent all attacks. Banning AR15's wont do a thing. Criminals will still get them. There is no way all those who have them will give them up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: krvanness
grbcane said:
You’re the only one who can be proven to support the direct actions that slaughter innocent babies.

Babies that feel the pain while being dismembered. You support it even in the ninth month.

You directly support their slaughter, so you’ve lost the moral high ground, and have disqualified yourself from judging anything.
Click to expand...
Not only do you support babies having babies after being raped but when the baby gets here you make sure he/she does not have affordable health care or a safe place in school.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zackbear and gokcub
sabrose said:
The founders knew that armed citizens are important to prevent a tyrannical government from abusing power. The fascists in the Biden regime have been limited only by the fear of millions of armed Americans . There have to be checks and balances on the power of government.
But its understandable to be upset that an 18 yo who essentially broadcast his psychosis was able to obtain the powerful weapons he used to do horrible things. No mention of a father in his life which is a common problem.
Better software to analyze social media before people are allowed to own a gun should be instituted. Better security in schools and public areas where people are not allowed to carry guns.
But if a psychopath is hell bent on causing destruction its very hard to prevent all attacks. Banning AR15's wont do a thing. Criminals will still get them. There is no way all those who have them will give them up.
Click to expand...
How do you explain why no other western country has this problem?
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawaiian cane and zackbear
You must log in or register to reply here.
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back