WOW.....These hyenas are learning how we give it up!
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/all...-sexual-misconduct-referred/story?id=58860529
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/all...-sexual-misconduct-referred/story?id=58860529
WOW.....These hyenas are learning how we give it up!
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/all...-sexual-misconduct-referred/story?id=58860529
LolJulie Swetnick worked for Mueller?
Jacob Wohl is definitely going to jail.
Wohl is a twenty year old who’s still wet behind the ears. Michel Avenatti is a practicing lawyer and potential democratic presidential nominee. Both pulled same stunt why no outrage for Avenatti ?
They are two completely different situations. In Avenatti's case, Grassely "thinks" he and his client were lying and has recommended DOJ investigate, which seems like a dumb move given that if the DOJ happen to accept Grassley's request, it would force the FBI into investigating Kavanaugh's involvement in the entire matter (something they conspicuously didn't do before given the tight 7 day timeline they were given).
In Wohl's case, he and Burkman are already busted as evidenced by the fact that their plot has already been sent to the feds for investigation.
https://www.snopes.com/news/2018/10/30/comically-flawed-attempt-smear-robert-mueller-explained/
They are two completely different situations. In Avenatti's case, Grassely "thinks" he and his client were lying and has recommended DOJ investigate, which seems like a dumb move given that if the DOJ happen to accept Grassley's request, it would force the FBI into investigating Kavanaugh's involvement in the entire matter (something they conspicuously didn't do before given the tight 7 day timeline they were given).
In Wohl's case, he and Burkman are already busted as evidenced by the fact that their plot has already been sent to the feds for investigation.
https://www.snopes.com/news/2018/10/30/comically-flawed-attempt-smear-robert-mueller-explained/
In Wohl's case, he and Burkman are already busted as evidenced by the fact that their plot has already been sent to the feds for investigation. So just like Kavanaugh guilty before investigation. Funny how that works.
The key word is alleged, maybe Mueller is trying to get ahead of some bad news headed his way
There is alleged solid evidence.They have to use alleged if there is no conviction yet. They would say alleged even if they have a shooter on tape killing a bank teller.
The allegation here is just as solid. There is evidence that backs up a woman's claim that a she was approached to do this.
Ouch, your analysis is just as bad as your political views!They are two completely different situations. In Avenatti's case, Grassely "thinks" he and his client were lying and has recommended DOJ investigate, which seems like a dumb move given that if the DOJ happen to accept Grassley's request, it would force the FBI into investigating Kavanaugh's involvement in the entire matter (something they conspicuously didn't do before given the tight 7 day timeline they were given).
In Wohl's case, he and Burkman are already busted as evidenced by the fact that their plot has already been sent to the feds for investigation.
https://www.snopes.com/news/2018/10/30/comically-flawed-attempt-smear-robert-mueller-explained/
I woman's charges should always be believed, no evidence required - quote Hillary ClintonWOW.....These hyenas are learning how we give it up!
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/all...-sexual-misconduct-referred/story?id=58860529
These bucked toothed donkeys are always wrongI woman's charges should always be believed, no evidence required - quote Hillary Clinton
Is the OP a zookeeper? From the Sahara? Nat Geo producer? Never seen dude talk about hyenas, donkeys, and other wild animals so much on an internet message board. Weird