Biden gonna hold China "accountable"
- Thread starter HJCane
- Start date
HJ,
Different POV:
* didn’t Trump pay more taxes in China than he did in the US? Yes
* as Senator Sasse said, Trump has betrayed the people of China by doing nothing to help Hong Kongers suffering under Beijing crackdowns on freedoms and completely ignoring the Uigher population who have been put in concentration camps by Beijing. Trump has done zero for these two groups.
Trump tough on China? A myth.
Different POV:
* didn’t Trump pay more taxes in China than he did in the US? Yes
* as Senator Sasse said, Trump has betrayed the people of China by doing nothing to help Hong Kongers suffering under Beijing crackdowns on freedoms and completely ignoring the Uigher population who have been put in concentration camps by Beijing. Trump has done zero for these two groups.
Trump tough on China? A myth.
Trump prepaid his taxes in the US which is why he only paid like $750. That was his filing fee. The media refuses to cover that though.
These guys are so stupid. I swear it it makes me feel awful for our Country
Have you seen his tax returns? Are you a blind sheep believing everything you are told? Wise up man
Neither you nor I have seen Trump’s tax return. However, he did not deny the accuracy of the report that he paid $750 total in US income tax.
Who is the blind sheep here?
The $750 was his filing fee. He prepaid over $10 million in taxes to IRS. CNN & MSNBC won’t cover just like the Biden Crime Family story.
No war. But, he could:
* defend the free speech rights of the Houston Rockets executive who said “We stand with Hong Kong.”
* he could stand with Hong Kong by criticizing China’s violation of its treaty with the UK on the timing of Chinese control of this city.
* he could criticize Chinese suppression of free speech in Hong Kong
* he could condemn the imprisonment of the Oigur population en masse.
Instead, he does nothing.
Tough on China? Not Trump.
Don’t think that’s correct. Your source?
Cash, Trump never denied that he only paid $750 to the US.
Dude your source is cnn and or msnbc so spare me that garbage lol. My apologies he paid $5.2 million and found out he overpaid. Like I said $750 for both years were filing fees. There are multiple sources. Google it
Then change the tax laws... Every corporation in this country takes advantage of the tax laws..
Tell me brainiac why can’t Trump...
You can prepay your taxes, you’re literally estimating what your tax bill is going to be, he only paid $750, because he paid the previous year. It’s funny how you make a big deal of this, while ignoring Joe selling access to China, among many others. Beijing Biden is compromised.
With all that Chinese money they’re going to owe a lot
That’s absolutely true - of course MSM won’t touch that fact
Hong Kong protesters rooting for anti-Beijing Trump to win
City’s opposition forces want candidate who can bash China hardest to win on Tuesday.
www.scmp.com
The President's Executive Order on Hong Kong Normalization | The White House
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the United States-Hong Kong Policy A
Dude business does a little thing called quarterly estimated taxes. I have already sent in many thousands thru 3 quarters and will do so again after Q4 ends. Then I will take every legitimate deduction I can to lower my final bill. I will make every move possible prior to April 15th to LOWER what I owe the Government including max out on retirement and HSA contributions. Now multiply that times 1000% for a Real Estate Developer. Those are our tax laws and codes and only a fool pays extra.
Right wing defenders of Trump’s low taxes on this site are pursuing two contradictory lines of argument:
* $750 in taxes is untrue. That’s just his filing fee. He has pre-paid millions in taxes.
vs.
* So what if he only paid $750? Like anybody else, he has taken full advantage of our tax laws.
The first argument makes very little sense. Trump has not denied that his taxes were very low. Filing fee? C’mon. Which commentator or news media source invented this argument? Absurd.
The second argument makes sense to me. Trump has engaged in highly leveraged, highly risky real estate ventures. Several of them failed, allowing him to claim > $1 billion dollars in losses. Those losses have been used to offset profits from other ventures.
This second point is the essence of the NYTimes exposė on Trump’s taxes. (I know you hate the NYT). I read their long and very detailed investigation on his taxes, copies of which they did obtain and publish. They didn’t allege tax fraud. They did allege that he has been a disastrous businessman who has racked up loss after loss on his casinos and golf course developments. He made millions from the apprentice and blew it on golf course and other failed real estate deals.
The Times’ conclusion: Trump’s fraud is convincing his backers that he’s a great businessman who will bring his tremendous skills to our government. He is instead a failed businessman who pays no taxes cuz he’s lost so much money. He has over $400 million of personally guaranteed debt owing to many groups. He can’t pay that debt.
He needs a new gig after he leaves the White House that will generate cash. A book deal? A talk show? Replace Rush on the radio? Rush is near death, after making about $50 million a year on his show. Trump is a logical successor to AM talk radio. It’s a great and lucrative pulpit.
* $750 in taxes is untrue. That’s just his filing fee. He has pre-paid millions in taxes.
vs.
* So what if he only paid $750? Like anybody else, he has taken full advantage of our tax laws.
The first argument makes very little sense. Trump has not denied that his taxes were very low. Filing fee? C’mon. Which commentator or news media source invented this argument? Absurd.
The second argument makes sense to me. Trump has engaged in highly leveraged, highly risky real estate ventures. Several of them failed, allowing him to claim > $1 billion dollars in losses. Those losses have been used to offset profits from other ventures.
This second point is the essence of the NYTimes exposė on Trump’s taxes. (I know you hate the NYT). I read their long and very detailed investigation on his taxes, copies of which they did obtain and publish. They didn’t allege tax fraud. They did allege that he has been a disastrous businessman who has racked up loss after loss on his casinos and golf course developments. He made millions from the apprentice and blew it on golf course and other failed real estate deals.
The Times’ conclusion: Trump’s fraud is convincing his backers that he’s a great businessman who will bring his tremendous skills to our government. He is instead a failed businessman who pays no taxes cuz he’s lost so much money. He has over $400 million of personally guaranteed debt owing to many groups. He can’t pay that debt.
He needs a new gig after he leaves the White House that will generate cash. A book deal? A talk show? Replace Rush on the radio? Rush is near death, after making about $50 million a year on his show. Trump is a logical successor to AM talk radio. It’s a great and lucrative pulpit.
We get it your a Trump hater... On the losing side again...
Your welcome for saving this nation...
Typical totally absurd analogy by Cortez.
So your donk ass is implying Trump should get involved with China’s internal affairs??????
Pfffft
