China
- Thread starter utatem
- Start date
You're not a Conservative you're a Fascist. You and your ilk have filed suit to overturn election results in 4 states to insert a corrupt POS. These elections were legal and fair. Your Fascist Party hasn't produced an iota of evidence to prove otherwise. Going forward I will call you who you are, a Fascist.
It’s a widely published lie debunked by the very govt you just cited lmao. Doubling down with another lie doesn’t make your first lie true.
Tell me when did your parents stop checking their mailbox for checks? Because when they got here I am sure they received and abundance of free $hit. Deplorable Fascist!!! BLM
At this point, denying Russian interference simply makes you a complicit asset of Russian intelligence efforts.
Press | Intelligence Committee
Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections
Key Judgments
- Russian efforts to influence the 2016 US presidential election represent the most recent expression of Moscow’s longstanding desire to undermine the US-led liberal democratic order, but these activities demonstrated a significant escalation in directness, level of activity, and scope of effort compared to previous operations. We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump. We have high confidence in these judgments
- We also assess Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him. All three agencies agree with this judgment. CIA and FBI have high confidence in this judgment; NSA has moderate confidence.
- Moscow’s approach evolved over the course of the campaign based on Russia’s understanding of the electoral prospects of the two main candidates. When it appeared to Moscow that Secretary Clinton was likely to win the election, the Russian influence campaign began to focus more on undermining her future presidency.
- Further information has come to light since Election Day that, when combined with Russian behavior since early November 2016, increases our confidence in our assessments of Russian motivations and goals.
- Moscow’s influence campaign followed a Russian messaging strategy that blends covert intelligence operations—such as cyber activity—with overt efforts by Russian Government agencies, state-funded media, third-party intermediaries, and paid social media users or “trolls.” Russia, like its Soviet predecessor, has a history of conducting covert influence campaigns focused on US presidential elections that have used intelligence officers and agents and press placements to disparage candidates perceived as hostile to the Kremlin.
- Russia’s intelligence services conducted cyber operations against targets associated with the 2016 US presidential election, including targets associated with both major US political parties.
- We assess with high confidence that Russian military intelligence (General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate or GRU) used the Guccifer 2.0 persona and DCLeaks.com to release US victim data obtained in cyber operations publicly and in exclusives to media outlets and relayed material to WikiLeaks.
- Russian intelligence obtained and maintained access to elements of multiple US state or local electoral boards. DHS assesses that the types of systems Russian actors targeted or compromised were not involved in vote tallying.
- Russia’s state-run propaganda machine contributed to the influence campaign by serving as a platform for Kremlin messaging to Russian and international audiences.
At this point, denying Russian interference simply makes you a complicit asset of Russian intelligence efforts.
Press | Intelligence Committee
www.intelligence.senate.gov
Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections
Key Judgments
- Russian efforts to influence the 2016 US presidential election represent the most recent expression of Moscow’s longstanding desire to undermine the US-led liberal democratic order, but these activities demonstrated a significant escalation in directness, level of activity, and scope of effort compared to previous operations. We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump. We have high confidence in these judgments
- We also assess Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him. All three agencies agree with this judgment. CIA and FBI have high confidence in this judgment; NSA has moderate confidence.
- Moscow’s approach evolved over the course of the campaign based on Russia’s understanding of the electoral prospects of the two main candidates. When it appeared to Moscow that Secretary Clinton was likely to win the election, the Russian influence campaign began to focus more on undermining her future presidency.
- Further information has come to light since Election Day that, when combined with Russian behavior since early November 2016, increases our confidence in our assessments of Russian motivations and goals.
- Moscow’s influence campaign followed a Russian messaging strategy that blends covert intelligence operations—such as cyber activity—with overt efforts by Russian Government agencies, state-funded media, third-party intermediaries, and paid social media users or “trolls.” Russia, like its Soviet predecessor, has a history of conducting covert influence campaigns focused on US presidential elections that have used intelligence officers and agents and press placements to disparage candidates perceived as hostile to the Kremlin.
- Russia’s intelligence services conducted cyber operations against targets associated with the 2016 US presidential election, including targets associated with both major US political parties.
- We assess with high confidence that Russian military intelligence (General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate or GRU) used the Guccifer 2.0 persona and DCLeaks.com to release US victim data obtained in cyber operations publicly and in exclusives to media outlets and relayed material to WikiLeaks.
- Russian intelligence obtained and maintained access to elements of multiple US state or local electoral boards. DHS assesses that the types of systems Russian actors targeted or compromised were not involved in vote tallying.
- Russia’s state-run propaganda machine contributed to the influence campaign by serving as a platform for Kremlin messaging to Russian and international audiences.
Lot of words that mean nothing , Russia has been doing this for years..
Bottom line no evidence it changed the results...
Yeah I’m sure you’re the expert to make this distinction! 🤡At this point, denying Russian interference simply makes you a complicit asset of Russian intelligence efforts.
Press | Intelligence Committee
Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections
Key Judgments
- Russian efforts to influence the 2016 US presidential election represent the most recent expression of Moscow’s longstanding desire to undermine the US-led liberal democratic order, but these activities demonstrated a significant escalation in directness, level of activity, and scope of effort compared to previous operations. We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump. We have high confidence in these judgments
- We also assess Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him. All three agencies agree with this judgment. CIA and FBI have high confidence in this judgment; NSA has moderate confidence.
- Moscow’s approach evolved over the course of the campaign based on Russia’s understanding of the electoral prospects of the two main candidates. When it appeared to Moscow that Secretary Clinton was likely to win the election, the Russian influence campaign began to focus more on undermining her future presidency.
- Further information has come to light since Election Day that, when combined with Russian behavior since early November 2016, increases our confidence in our assessments of Russian motivations and goals.
- Moscow’s influence campaign followed a Russian messaging strategy that blends covert intelligence operations—such as cyber activity—with overt efforts by Russian Government agencies, state-funded media, third-party intermediaries, and paid social media users or “trolls.” Russia, like its Soviet predecessor, has a history of conducting covert influence campaigns focused on US presidential elections that have used intelligence officers and agents and press placements to disparage candidates perceived as hostile to the Kremlin.
- Russia’s intelligence services conducted cyber operations against targets associated with the 2016 US presidential election, including targets associated with both major US political parties.
- We assess with high confidence that Russian military intelligence (General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate or GRU) used the Guccifer 2.0 persona and DCLeaks.com to release US victim data obtained in cyber operations publicly and in exclusives to media outlets and relayed material to WikiLeaks.
- Russian intelligence obtained and maintained access to elements of multiple US state or local electoral boards. DHS assesses that the types of systems Russian actors targeted or compromised were not involved in vote tallying.
- Russia’s state-run propaganda machine contributed to the influence campaign by serving as a platform for Kremlin messaging to Russian and international audiences.
Yeah not like the Democrats they put their boot on the necks of blacks from right after the civil war and just kept it there.
Everyone knows the parties have reversed roles on race relations over the past 5 decades. For evidence, just look at how many non-white people vote Republican and that should tell you all you need to know about why racism and xenophobia are losing issues for Republicans.
I'll take your one liner and clown emoji as vindication that you can't rebut the litany of facts I posted.
🤡
If that were true then most non-white voters would vote Republican. The fact that they don't suggests you're simply (and disingenuously) attempting to blame anyone but Republicans for the fact that they are broadly viewed as a culturally homogenous party built around conservative white identity; hence the race baiting and xenophobia we see on a daily basis from not just Trumpers, but also traditional conservatives. If no one outside of primarily white males votes for one party then maybe that party needs to take a long hard look in the mirror to see what its doing wrong, and make the necessary corrections.
Last edited:
And how has this worked out for these minority communities. I don’t agree with the role reversal either. Civil rights act was filibustered by the Democrats just for one example. George Wallace a Democrat Robert Byrd you know the guy Joe Biden eulogized.
Last edited:
That's like saying the United States was founded on the ultimate double standard - it was formed by slave owners who wanted to be free. What transpired centuries ago may be interesting to history buffs, but if you're looking at the present, there's little debate as to shallow cultural gene pool that represents the Republican party of the present. At least in Reagan's day, there was a perception that it stood for freedom and liberty - now it just seems to stand for full on racism and xenophobia that is being driven by the demagogues on Fox and Talk Radio and implemented by banana republic dictators like Trump.
It hasn't worked out for most Americans, since the rich only get richer at the expense off the backs of the middle class and at the expense of the poor. Therefore historically disenfranchised groups are less likely to make any progress until the system is changed to balance the playing field for all.
This is why we never make progress in this country. There are people out there hurting financially and people's response is to make a mockery of things.
If you don't like freedom of the press then that's not something I can help you with.
Hence the drift towards fascism among Republicans. You can't control the media to say what you want it to, and have now taken to discrediting it. Russia, Turkey or Hungary may be better options for you.
Wrong. Europe is free (except Hungary) and are largely social democratic - free healthcare and a strong social safety net, where the rich pay their fair share in taxes. That's reasonable policy that all reasonable Americans can get behind.
Paranoia and ignorance doesn't seem to suit you. Try educating yourself about some of these issues and come back and try again.
There are 14 characteristics of fascism - Trump Republicans meet a vast majority of them. Don't make me embarrass you any further by listing them again.
I can go all day - if not for your intellectual cowardice and ignorance of course. Crack open a book or two and feel free to give it another shot. You're never too old to learn a thing or two.
You posted something which has already not only been disputed but proven incorrect! You just ignore that and keep on with your bs narrative which is hilarious, hence the clown emoji
The $hit that you post shows just how DUMB you are. You dont even know your history. Shameful Deplorable. Keep believing in Conspiracy theories.
How odd, given that you consistently do what you accuse me of, probably as a way to obfuscate from the fact that I'm right.
Haven’t written one in over a decade scooter, keep reaching. May want to take a warm up lap first though!
Like i said, take a warm up lap scooter!
CIA told Obama of claim Hillary Clinton conjured Trump-Russia scandal: spy chief
Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe on Tuesday revealed a bombshell allegation that Hillary Clinton ordered “a campaign plan to stir up a scandal” by linking President Trump to Russia …
nypost.com
Like i said, take a warm up lap scooter!
CIA told Obama of claim Hillary Clinton conjured Trump-Russia scandal: spy chief
Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe on Tuesday revealed a bombshell allegation that Hillary Clinton ordered “a campaign plan to stir up a scandal” by linking President Trump to Russia …
How about some official data from the government, and not from cherry picked articles from Murdoch run tabloids.
But you and yours are still receiving / looting/rioting for your money. BLUE LIVES MATTER is the only BLM that matters. You freakin socialist / democrats are racist as hell !!!
Absolutely one of the more ignorant statements ever posted ... Congrats ... Dems been keeping minorities down forever ... no stats needs , just open your eyes and see what’s really going on in all Dem run cites ... u think Pelosi , Schumer , Schiff , Biden etc. really give a shit ... not saying Republicans give a shit either , but the Dems 💯 perpetuate racism .., it’s good business for them
Got it so yeah you don’t like what it said so it can’t be true and it’s dismissed. How very open minded and willing to observe evidence and facts lmao.
This is literally impossible given that people of color make up a large chunk of the Democratic Party. What you’re basically suggesting is that black people are actively working to keep themselves down through their own policy preferences, which is of course absurd and a known right wing talking point that gets commonly brainwashed into right wingers to keep them from confronting the real problem of systemic imbalances.
U keep thinking what your thinking and I’ll do the same ... I’m good w/ my thought process .. hope you truly feel the same... . and for my knowledge , are you implying that a group of minorities would never hold their own people down ???? Money and power is a very persuasive thing ( just watch Dateline or 20/20 sometime ... spouses killing spouses , biz partners killing each other , kids killing parents , etc.)... you seem to be a very narrow minded person who has no ability to think outside the box , but that’s just my own opinion
Last edited:
