ADVERTISEMENT

FOX NEWS CALLS OUT TRUMPS LIES AT CPAC......CLASSIC!!!

AccomplishedSatisfiedBarracuda-size_restricted.gif
 
LMAO yeah thrown out alright....

In an October 2020 hearing, as Mr. Trump’s lawsuits note, Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut told CEOs Jack Dorsey of Twitter and Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook: “The president has used this microphone to spread vicious falsehoods and apparent attempt to overturn the will of the voters.” In the same hearing, he threatened “a breakup of the tech giants” and “Section 230 reform,” including “possible repeal.” Mr. Zuckerberg has called such regulations an “existential threat” to Facebook. In January both sites banned Mr. Trump.



Even if Messrs. Zuckerberg and Dorsey didn’t fear these government threats, the Second Circuit held in Hammerhead Enterprises v. Brezenoff (1983) that if government officials’ comments “can be reasonably interpreted as intimating that some form of punishment or adverse regulatory action will follow the failure to accede to the official’s request,” that’s enough to constitute state action. The Ninth Circuit has held that it doesn’t matter if the threats were the “real motivating force” behind the private party’s conduct.

A growing body of evidence suggests that social media companies have voluntarily worked with Democratic officials to censor content the latter disfavor. In Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association (2001), the high court held that state action exists if the private party’s conduct results from “significant encouragement, either overt or covert,” or if the private party is a “willful participant in joint activity with the State or its agents.”

According to allegations in other pending lawsuits, Twitter formed “trusted partner” relationships with state officials to remove content identified by the officials as election misinformation—when in reality the content was simply critical of state policies.
 
Trump is the only person who lies. Here's the proof:



LOL....you people sound like complete idiots pretending he was banned because he lies. If he was gonna be banned because he lies he would have banned years ago. Also, I could even make a solid argument a sitting president shouldn't be on these forums lying. They have a much bigger microphone than the rest of us. However, he wasn't banned for lying.

He was banned because of his incessant hate speech. Lying isn't against the terms of these forums. Hates speech however is against the rules of these forums. You can NOT incite resurrections of our country for example based on hate speeches. You would have to be stupid to think these companies are going to allow this.

Do you believe you will not be banned here at canesport for promoting hate speech? I don't care what forum online you are on. That isn't going to be allowed. This is common sense. You can't scream fire in a crowded theater. Thats not protected under your freedom of speech. Not because it is a lie. But because it endangers others.

Some people want a civil war. People on this forum come to the lounge and talk about civil war.....but guess what? When you go online and talk about such ridiculousness it will be met with a swift kick in your ass. Especially if you have hundreds of millions of followers. Hell, even if very few people follow you. It is stupid talk and shouldn't be discussed on any forum.
 
Last edited:
LOL....you people sound like complete idiots pretending he was banned because he lies. If he was gonna be banned because he lies he would have banned years ago. Also, I could even make a solid argument a sitting president shouldn't be on these forums lying. They have a much bigger microphone than the rest of us. However, he wasn't banned for lying.

He was banned because of his incessant hate speech. Lying isn't against the terms of these forums. Hates speech however is against the rules of these forums. You can NOT incite resurrections of our country for example based on hate speeches. You would have to be stupid to think these companies are going to allow this.

Do you believe you will not be banned here at canesport for promoting hate speech? I don't care what forum online you are on. That isn't going to be allowed. This is common sense. You can't scream fire in a crowded theater. Thats not protected under your freedom of speech. Not because it is a lie. But because it endangers others.

Some people want a civil war. People on this forum come to the lounge and talk about civil war.....but guess what? When you go online and talk about such ridiculousness it will be met with a swift kick in your ass. Especially if you have hundreds of millions of followers. Hell, even if very few people follow you. It is stupid talk and shouldn't be discussed on any forum.
LMAO, not only are you a moron when it comes to football...yes telling people to protest peacefully is incitement alright. And funny how him saying the truth about clowns you adore is hate speeech
 
  • Like
Reactions: mahb and krvanness
LOL....you people sound like complete idiots pretending he was banned because he lies. If he was gonna be banned because he lies he would have banned years ago. Also, I could even make a solid argument a sitting president shouldn't be on these forums lying. They have a much bigger microphone than the rest of us. However, he wasn't banned for lying.

He was banned because of his incessant hate speech. Lying isn't against the terms of these forums. Hates speech however is against the rules of these forums. You can NOT incite resurrections of our country for example based on hate speeches. You would have to be stupid to think these companies are going to allow this.

Do you believe you will not be banned here at canesport for promoting hate speech? I don't care what forum online you are on. That isn't going to be allowed. This is common sense. You can't scream fire in a crowded theater. Thats not protected under your freedom of speech. Not because it is a lie. But because it endangers others.

Some people want a civil war. People on this forum come to the lounge and talk about civil war.....but guess what? When you go online and talk about such ridiculousness it will be met with a swift kick in your ass. Especially if you have hundreds of millions of followers. Hell, even if very few people follow you. It is stupid talk and shouldn't be discussed on any forum.
"He was banned because of his incessant hate speech."

Do you have any exact quotes supporting that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: CashvilleCane1
"He was banned because of his incessant hate speech."

Do you have any exact quotes supporting that?
I don't need exact quotes. This is what the social media forums that banned him stated. So you will have to find that out from who banned him. Not me.

I believe them soley based on his rhetoric I have heard and his actions and what we have seen. Jan 6 many stated in court under oath what happened.

You choose to believe what you want to believe. Anything from everyone picks on him, he is a victim, or whatever. It's not changing facts. He is banned and that's a fact. He is a POS. That's my opinion.
 
Last edited:
I don't need exact quotes. This is what the social media forums that banned him stated. So you will have to find that out from who banned him. Not me.

I believe them soley based on his rhetoric I have heard and his actions and what we have seen. Jan 6 many stated in court under oath what happened.

You choose to believe what you want to believe. Anything from everyone picks on him, he is a victim, or whatever. It's not changing facts. He is banned and that's a fact. He is a POS. That's my opinion.
So you've got nothing. OK, thanks.
 
There is no single definition of "hate speech." Many on the left get up every morning and look for something that offends them. Hence race baiting, and cancel culture. There doesn't have to be a logical explanation or reason, just one person's opinion. As a minority, I have been the target of ugly comments for decades but I look at them as stupidity on the part of the speakers, not hate speech. Epithets are not examples of hate speech
 
There is no single definition of "hate speech." Many on the left get up every morning and look for something that offends them. Hence race baiting, and cancel culture. There doesn't have to be a logical explanation or reason, just one person's opinion. As a minority, I have been the target of ugly comments for decades but I look at them as stupidity on the part of the speakers, not hate speech. Epithets are not examples of hate speech
Yes there is a single definition of hate speech. What are you talking about?

The same thing offend me every single morning. People that incessantly lie to me. Racist assholes who attack my country. Loser cucks who are okay with racist assholes and thier insurection.

Loser assholes pretending they won elections they did not.

Racist assholes that separate families.

Losers who don't pay thier taxes....on and on.
 
Last edited:
Yes there is a single definition of hate speech. What are you talking about?

The same thing offend me every single morning. People that incessantly lie to me. Racist assholes who attack my country. Loser cucks who are okay with racist assholes and thier insurection.

Loser assholes pretending they won elections they did not.

Racist assholes that separate families.

Losers who don't pay thier taxes....on and on.
You realize you just outed Biden and the DemoRats right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: utatem
You realize you just outed Biden and the DemoRats right?
Nope...I know who is out. The people in court and jail. You can play make believe all you want. Everyone else sees what has happened.

Straight. We don't need the umbrella..or the pickle back or coke or ice. None of that..... straight jack for grown men here
 
Yep pretending on the election...From Arizona, the first domino


( Senate Leader ) Townsend: Okay, well it’s a come to Jesus moment. They’re accusing cyber ninjas of not being credible, and you know this information that’s going to come out, I’ll be very interested to see what their reaction is. But if they’re not credible, then come forward with this information and prove them wrong. But instead they have done nothing but obstruct, deny, distract and mock us, so the county supervisors and Adrian Fontes and his team, what we heard today we learned, and we’re not surprised that it was an absolute failure....

Townsend: Well I see indictments in their future if we are able to establish this if we go forward in court. I see, perhaps the public coming forward and doing recalls, and at the very least, I don’t see them ever winning another election again. It’s very sad, we didn’t have to go through it in this manner, even if none of that was true today, the way that they handled today was a Twitter feed, that’s their response to the Arizona State Senate is replying to us on Twitter. And that is not appropriate. That is not a functioning government that is high school. So bring it up a notch, several notches and come sit with us and cooperate, provide the facts. Show us why you don’t have logs for these early ballots being mailed out but not requested. Show us why you removed the 10s of 1000s of people who registered to vote, voted and then remove them. Show us, show us why you didn’t follow the law, and put the serial numbers matching the duplicated ballots with each other, why you took the stamp and put it over the black mark so you can’t see the serial number.
 
I don't need anything. Lmao...the dude is banned and I am not. If you want to know why then asked who banned him. Not me.
I asked you because you stated in a earlier post, "He was banned because of his incessant hate speech.", to which I asked you to provide an example. You didn't(because you don't have anything), so I said "OK, you've got nothing. Thanks."
NOW you say "I don't need anything".

You've just made my point, again. Thanks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CashvilleCane1
They are just like that punk Trump. Tough online....cowards in real life.
I asked you because you stated in a earlier post, "He was banned because of his incessant hate speech.", to which I asked you to provide an example. You didn't(because you don't have anything), so I said "OK, you've got nothing. Thanks."
NOW you say "I don't need anything".

You've just made my point, again. Thanks.

I clearly said that is what is who banned him said right? Okay then....keep up. So, get an example from THEM not me. Finding a chronological list of what Trump has done is not hard. Even an idiot could google it themselves. You need to stop living this life. The guy is a POS and you are asking me on canesport to give you proof? Look it up for yourself if you really want to know. The truth is you do not want to know because you can't handle the fact he is out here doing these things.

 
Last edited:
I clearly said that is what is who banned him said right? Okay then....keep up. So, get an example from THEM not me. Finding a chronological list of what Trump has done is not hard. Even an idiot could google it themselves. You need to stop living this life. The guy is a POS and you are asking me on canesport to give you proof? Look it up for yourself if you really want to know. The truth is you do not want to know because you can't handle the fact he is out here doing these things.

LMAO at Vox, what a mindless rube you are
 
  • Like
Reactions: krvanness
I clearly said that is what is who banned him said right? Okay then....keep up. So, get an example from THEM not me. Finding a chronological list of what Trump has done is not hard. Even an idiot could google it themselves. You need to stop living this life. The guy is a POS and you are asking me on canesport to give you proof? Look it up for yourself if you really want to know. The truth is you do not want to know because you can't handle the fact he is out here doing these things.

@IbisRules07 summed it up. The VOX article you cited begins with:

On the very day that Congress counted the electoral votes that certified President-elect Joe Biden’s victory, Trump opened up the US Capitol to an insurrection.

He told a crowd rallying south of the White House to “walk down to the Capitol,” adding, “You will never take back our country with weakness.”
TOTAL BS.


Read the transcript of Trumps speech from 1/6 and educate yourself for a change in lieu of blindly following Google and a rag like VOX.
 
I clearly said that is what is who banned him said right? Okay then....keep up. So, get an example from THEM not me.

@IbisRules07 summed it up. The VOX article you cited begins with:

On the very day that Congress counted the electoral votes that certified President-elect Joe Biden’s victory, Trump opened up the US Capitol to an insurrection.

He told a crowd rallying south of the White House to “walk down to the Capitol,” adding, “You will never take back our country with weakness.”
TOTAL BS.


Read the transcript of Trumps speech from 1/6 and educate yourself for a change in lieu of blindly following Google and a rag like VOX.
I imagine everyone that doesn't buy Trump's inflaming, racist, divisive rhetoric is a rag. That's his movement...lol. You haven't dispelled a single thing in the article. What in it they chronicle is untrue and why. You asked for this. Not me. So if your response is going to be "this is a rag" that doesn't tell us anything in regards to dispelling what is documented here. See people like you talk huge shit. Then tag others that talk huge shit but you have absolutely no real rebuttal other than calling this a rag. That's how cults work. I'm not part of a cult. I think independently. I don't relate to tagging people to make a point. I just make it and it is usually very compelling. Not..." This is a rag. You would know why by the time I am done.

I Heard trump's speech. Did you hear his lawyers speech about trial by combat? You guys can play stupid all you want but America don't play. We are here if you want action. You see how we give it up.
 
@IbisRules07 summed it up. The VOX article you cited begins with:

On the very day that Congress counted the electoral votes that certified President-elect Joe Biden’s victory, Trump opened up the US Capitol to an insurrection.

He told a crowd rallying south of the White House to “walk down to the Capitol,” adding, “You will never take back our country with weakness.”
TOTAL BS.


Read the transcript of Trumps speech from 1/6 and educate yourself for a change in lieu of blindly following Google and a rag like VOX.
Pffft
 
LMAO yeah thrown out alright....

In an October 2020 hearing, as Mr. Trump’s lawsuits note, Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut told CEOs Jack Dorsey of Twitter and Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook: “The president has used this microphone to spread vicious falsehoods and apparent attempt to overturn the will of the voters.” In the same hearing, he threatened “a breakup of the tech giants” and “Section 230 reform,” including “possible repeal.” Mr. Zuckerberg has called such regulations an “existential threat” to Facebook. In January both sites banned Mr. Trump.



Even if Messrs. Zuckerberg and Dorsey didn’t fear these government threats, the Second Circuit held in Hammerhead Enterprises v. Brezenoff (1983) that if government officials’ comments “can be reasonably interpreted as intimating that some form of punishment or adverse regulatory action will follow the failure to accede to the official’s request,” that’s enough to constitute state action. The Ninth Circuit has held that it doesn’t matter if the threats were the “real motivating force” behind the private party’s conduct.

A growing body of evidence suggests that social media companies have voluntarily worked with Democratic officials to censor content the latter disfavor. In Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association (2001), the high court held that state action exists if the private party’s conduct results from “significant encouragement, either overt or covert,” or if the private party is a “willful participant in joint activity with the State or its agents.”

According to allegations in other pending lawsuits, Twitter formed “trusted partner” relationships with state officials to remove content identified by the officials as election misinformation—when in reality the content was simply critical of state policies.
RE:
Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut told CEOs Jack Dorsey of Twitter and Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook:

I just can't take seriously a Senator that lies about their Military record.
 
  • Like
Reactions: utatem
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT