Why isn’t Hunter out campaigning for pops AKA the “Big Guy “ “the Chairman” like Trumps kids are ?
Shame on him
Shame on him
His kids are also running the business that is historically should be divested. See why whataboutism is silly.Why isn’t Hunter out campaigning for pops AKA the “Big Guy “ “the Chairman” like Trumps kids are ?
Shame on him
Oh I thought my point was made. whataboutism makes you ask why Biden's son isn't doing what Trump's sons are doing.ellu you added a comment to my question with your whataboutism -
But my question wasn’t answered - why isn’t Hunter out helping his pops on the campaign trail - is he in hiding or living in the bigs guys basement
His kids are also running the business that is historically should be divested. See why whataboutism is silly.
His kids are also running the business that is historically should be divested. See why whataboutism is silly.
None?And none of Trumps kids hold office that I know of - none are in his Cabinet
Actually no ellu, If pure subjective logic was applied you would see the difference between a career politician that now owns numerous homes and made $$$$$ from exposure, whose son used access to a real time VP, rather than a son who is running an already extremely successful company, that was and is successful BEFORE he took office.Oh I thought my point was made. whataboutism makes you ask why Biden's son isn't doing what Trump's sons are doing.
Logically, you might ask why Trump's sons, who are literally running the business he hasn't divested in, are campaigning for him. If it is implicit that Biden son's compensation results from his relationship with dad, wouldn't Trump's son's be subject to the same scrutiny? Of course they would if whatboutism was applied, hell if logic was applied.
Fact is Biden's living son and his daughter have not been part of his campaigns in the past. As folks are so fond of pointing out Biden has been around 40 odd years, how many times did Hunter campaign in the past?
How is that logical with regard as to why they are not campaigning?Actually no ellu, If pure subjective logic was applied you would see the difference between a career politician that now owns numerous homes and made $$$$$ from exposure, whose son used access to a real time VP, rather than a son who is running an already extremely successful company, that was and is successful BEFORE he took office.
Your logic is subjective logic, my friend
Yes none - what cabinet positions do any of his kids hold ? Name any , name one elluNone?
Very simple my educated friend, I explained the difference betwHow is that logical with regard as to why they are not campaigning?
You forget what you posted?????. IHow is that logical with regard as to why they are not campaigning?
Not historically true at all, at least in context of the constitution. The founders didn’t even quit their jobs when they took office. George Washington was still a farmer. The emoluments clause doesn’t cover business prior to holding office.
Why should he..He is at the center of an smear campaign by Fox and Rudy....Joe Biden understands they are all lies but it’s probably best Hunter stay out this time around..Maybe 2024 would be a better option when Joe runs for re-election..Why isn’t Hunter out campaigning for pops AKA the “Big Guy “ “the Chairman” like Trumps kids are ?
Shame on him
Why should he..He is at the center of an smear campaign by Fox and Rudy....Joe Biden understands they are all lies but it’s probably best Hunter stay out this time around..Maybe 2024 would be a better option when Joe runs for re-election..
Smear: damage the reputation of (someone) by false accusations;Why should he..He is at the center of an smear campaign by Fox and Rudy....Joe Biden understands they are all lies but it’s probably best Hunter stay out this time around..Maybe 2024 would be a better option when Joe runs for re-election..
Truth over facts. Just ask Joe...Smear: damage the reputation of (someone) by false accusations;
How is this a smear campaign with all of the documents, etc. that has been presented?