not every slave, in the history of slaves, was or is a black man from Africa. slaves were from taking over cities....I feel you dont see that to be true.
Posted from wireless.rivals.com[/URL]
Posted from wireless.rivals.com[/URL]
Religious does not equal God. You're smarter than that I hope.Originally posted by SaltwaterCane:
religious text is metaphor...god is myth...so are the sin of gays...right azar...its all fake...even your point of hate...you made it in your own head
Posted from wireless.rivals.com
Please indicate one sentence or one line where this is said or insinuated in the slightestOriginally posted by SaltwaterCane:
not every slave, in the history of slaves, was or is a black man from Africa. slaves were from taking over cities....I feel you dont see that to be true.
Posted from wireless.rivals.com
Originally posted by Azar
Religious does not equal God. You're smarter than that I hope.Originally posted by SaltwaterCane:
religious text is metaphor...god is myth...so are the sin of gays...right azar...its all fake...even your point of hate...you made it in your own head
Posted from wireless.rivals.com
Why do you assume that my issue with homosexuality is based on my spirituality or a religious belief? I've never indicated that one bit. God has never written one word of any book you've read. Every words you've ever read was written by man and his so-called inspiration or interpretation of God's word aka 3rd party info. I'm a spiritualist and a naturalist, as I mentioned before, the very idea of same sex is disgusting to me because of my natural (i.e. nature) attraction to women. People or the researches who claim this animal homosexuality as a basis of human sexuality are first of all discrediting human intelligence by saying they operate as wild animals and secondly, I nor anyone I've asked has ever seen these instances of homosexuality that's supposedly occurring in nature. Why, if its so common? Shouldn't we see it all the time if it's so normal? You see, logic wins out every time in this gay argument. Who funded the research on this gay animal study, btw? Was it by chance funded by the LGBT or some gay organization? More that likely, it was. Kinda like a positive ending to a study on chocolate funded by Hershey's. Lol. In addition to it being a disgusting act, imo, it's anti-nature and anti-life, and culturally not an African tradition. Everywhere in nature you find the male/female design and balance. It is only lustful and morally twisted humans who attempt to intellectualize a shift in this balance. Therefore, I am offended at the attempt to force those who do not agree or approve of it to accept such acts.Originally posted by SaltwaterCane:
Originally posted by Azar
Religious does not equal God. You're smarter than that I hope.Originally posted by SaltwaterCane:
religious text is metaphor...god is myth...so are the sin of gays...right azar...its all fake...even your point of hate...you made it in your own head
Posted from wireless.rivals.com
I do. which is why I support spirituality over religion.
then where does the backing of god come into play with being anti-gay? unless I misread your post, could have, isnt that your reasons? or are prejudiced just because it grosses you out? because without written word of god...the hate is your own.
Posted from wireless.rivals.com
Sorry, but you don't get to tell me or anyone else to keep anything personnel. You aren't the boss of me.Originally posted by lkantor:
CDwright, I did not realize you were a geneticist. What gene is the homosexual gene associated with? Why do you think you are born that way, you might be, but you also may choose to go that direction as well. They are very much one on the same, it is a choice. And I for one could care less what choice they make,but they should not get praised by the First Lady of the U.S.
Keep your personal preferences personal. Period!
Originally posted by lkantor:
So andyctree, are you telling us you "chug cock"? Good for you, glad to know you are coming out of the closet, be true to yourself.
But, I still dont want to know about it, nor do you deserve praise from the First Lady. I am not asking him to deny his sexual preferences, but there is no need to publicize it either. Keep it personal and respect others as there are many others don't want to hear anyone elses personal preferences either.
Originally posted by lkantor:
CDwright, I did not realize you were a geneticist. What gene is the homosexual gene associated with? Why do you think you are born that way, you might be, but you also may choose to go that direction as well. They are very much one on the same, it is a choice. And I for one could care less what choice they make,but they should not get praised by the First Lady of the U.S.
Keep your personal preferences personal. Period!
Originally posted by NCTopgoon:
Here, let's take them one at a time, if you dare.
You MUST show your identification to board an airplane, cash a check, buy liquor, or check out a library book and rent a video, but not to vote for who runs the government ?
Do you agree with our policy on this? If so, please explain why.
So you don't think anyone should have to show ID for anything?Originally posted by andyctree:
Originally posted by NCTopgoon:
Here, let's take them one at a time, if you dare.
You MUST show your identification to board an airplane, cash a check, buy liquor, or check out a library book and rent a video, but not to vote for who runs the government ?
Do you agree with our policy on this? If so, please explain why.
I don't agree with any of those things.
Posted from wireless.rivals.com
What your saying is exactly my point, it's not normal and it's personally not my social, moral, or ethical norm. I believe I get what you're trying to say in your Asian citizen analogy but I personally think its an apples or oranges comparison. Again you misinterpret my statement regarding animals participating in homo acts, I never denied that homosexuality in animals occurs or the possibility of it occurring. I said that I nor anyone I've asked has ever seen it. I'll mark you down as the first. However, it still does not invalidate my point of it not being a norm amongst animals. As someone mentioned earlier, their are no gay animals although they may act in that manner at times. I also questioned the study, it's purpose, and who funded it. Who spends the huge amount of money it takes to fund such a study, who's interest would it be? And regarding the animals and their intellect, my statement was not to discredit the intelligence of animals. Their is proven intelligence shown by damn near every species on animals known. However, animals often operate on instinct and in a primal fashion. Humans don't go jump on the first person they see when they get horny or instinctively kill person from another culture, etc. I mean we do at times but its called a crime and you're azz goes to jail for it. You follow me? So, I don't doubt your experience but this is my position, one that I stand on firmly. People say it's hate, homophobe (the new buzz word), or whatever but I'm not out trying to hurt or harm any homosexual, I don't wish any harm to anyone of them, and I believe they should be treated equally and fairly as long as it does not infringes on anyone else's right to exercise their beliefs with the same fair and equitable treatment. This is and will remain my principles and my principles and no amount of society re-conditioning will change that.Originally posted by SaltwaterCane:
It occurs, but I wouldn't say its normal. Normal would represent what happens most often...as humans would define. So heterosexuals are more normal. Regardless of normal it occurs, which is why you dont see it everyday. Asians - Americans make up a small percentage of american citizens, thus its not "normal". Just a comparison. Or left handed people are not the norm.
If you live in so fla...hike this summer around big cypress...set up a tree stand and do some nature watching. I cant guarantee anything bc its not normal but after many hours in the woods I can tell you stuff occurs....like a buck mounting another buck...strange...I couldn't believe it. I do know.
I respect your place of prejudice based on disgust and reproduction, but it does happen in nature. You cant keep saying it doesn't. Our use of language expresses our intellectual ability in a way other smart animals cannot. Such as dolphins or octopuses or primates. We have found other animals who do things for "pleasure" which indicates an intelligent cognitive thought. So I dont believe were the only ones capable of forming an opinion. Hell ive seen deer change their behaviors or carry out rage for a previous act...its weird until you see emotion in action in nature. It is real and exists.
I'm not grandstanding in the least. Flat out, you are an idiot and I run circles around you mentally. Your "those that can, do.." Stuff is interesting. It's a stupid old phrase that assumes people either do 1 or the other, whereas the reality is most professors -myself included- both practice in their field and teach. UM doesn't really hire people who aren't excellent at both- we're not FSU. I was good enough for the United States Dept of Justice, And I was good enough for UM. And yes, I know why I spend time teaching law at my age, it's bc I'm the youngest faculty member in the history of my department and probably the entire school - I started at 25. What we have here is a classic dunning-Kruger example. Essentially, D-K did a study that showed there's a substantial portion of our population that is below the median intelligence line but is deluded and thinks they are well above it. That's you. If you think you can fight me on this, lets go for it. Give me your best three logical, debate-worthy reasons why the gay rights movement is wrong and I will promptly rip you to shreds.Originally posted by LoveTHUGU:
Wake, stop grandstanding. This is at least the 4th time you have engaged me in a "discussion" about this topic and I have embarrassed you three previous times and I will do it again if you insist. I would say don't underestimate me if I didn't know you are just puffing out your chest trying to act like you're hot shit. You know damn well you're damaged goods. Bring it on, let me know "what the pecking order is". BTW do you know why you spend your time teaching law at your age? Yea, you know. Those that can, do, those that can't, teach......
I 1000% assure you that people vocalizing views like those you have written in this thread is substantially more dangerous for impressionable children than any marketing campaign on this issue by the mainstream media has been. I respect your post above saying you don't want to harm or infringe on homosexuals. I truly do respect that. That post was your best, most even-keeled, and respectable post in this thread. But I ask you to remain even keeled and consider that just by espousing the views you have here you are part of a problem which causes irreparable harm to gay youth.Originally posted by Azar:
P.S. I'm also against it's promotion and the celebratory marketing campaign of it as a societal norm and the confusion it creates on the impressionable minds of children...
My stance causes irreparable harm to gay youth? Really? Please explain, how might my views harm the "gay" youth? How many of these gay youthful people are there do you think? Why do you believe the percentages of homosexuality amongst the youth are all of sudden increasing? Think this "gay" gene is all of sudden popping up more?Originally posted by wake4law_cane4life:
I 1000% assure you that people vocalizing views like those you have written in this thread is substantially more dangerous for impressionable children than any marketing campaign on this issue by the mainstream media has been. I respect your post above saying you don't want to harm or infringe on homosexuals. I truly do respect that. That post was your best, most even-keeled, and respectable post in this thread. But I ask you to remain even keeled and consider that just by espousing the views you have here you are part of a problem which causes irreparable harm to gay youth.Originally posted by Azar:
P.S. I'm also against it's promotion and the celebratory marketing campaign of it as a societal norm and the confusion it creates on the impressionable minds of children...
P.S.- your information about the misinformation in the bible was 100% accurate and it shows me I misjudged your intellect. The bible is a revisionist history written by powerful white people and subsequently edited and revised by more powerful white people over the course of the last 2000 years. It should be unsurprising to most that the bible advances the agenda of the white majority.
Yes, I do. When young people are told, in essence, they are substandard human beings it has a variety of psychological consequences in them. It's not really hard to understand that. And homosexuality amongst youth is not increasing and I challenge you to show me one legit, reputable study that says that it is. What you will find is that the incidence of people being willing to REPORT that they are homosexual is increasing. It again should not be surprising that more people are willing to identify themselves as homosexuals publicly or in a study now than 60 years ago.Originally posted by Azar:
My stance causes irreparable harm to gay youth? Really? Please explain, how might my views harm the "gay" youth? How many of these gay youthful people are there do you think? Why do you believe the percentages of homosexuality amongst the youth are all of sudden increasing? Think this "gay" gene is all of sudden popping up more?
Fukin brilliant. Soo spot on and so well said.Originally posted by canesrule21'ships:
Wake you or anyone on this Board can run circles around Love Bug by standing still, i.e. not much effort is required.
As to those who assume Love Bug should be given a pass because of his alleged military service, I caution you to not assume he is anything more than a pimply faced former high school ROTC. He may in fact be a war hero, maybe he holds the Silver Star, but don't assume so because he has some dime store insignia as his Avatar,
Ask yourself this: if you have ever known or had a chance to meet a real military hero, do any of them display the contemptible bullying conduct that Love Bug epitomizes? Not really. He cyber blasts all that disagree with him. He picks on gays; his favorite expressions (presumably as attempted put downs) involve gay sex acts. Perhaps he is so fearful of being gay he spends his whole day bashing them (so as to distance himself from the probability he has been living a lie all these years). I don't know. He may be heterosexual, but even if he is or isn't, I am almost certain he is no military war hero. Maybe he got the bronze star for brilliant logistics, but I am almost sure not anywhere near a F.O.B. I may be wrong but real heroes who have faced death and been forced to take human life in battle do not behave like petulant, spoiled, badly behaved children.
And finally, I would remind all of the famous quote: "Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel." People hide behind different things: some behind a computer screen, some behind a made up persona and some even hide behind the flag while engaging in pretend chest thumping. And there is that unique individual who finds it necessary to use all three for shelter. Personally, I find it very sad.
Lol. So you think I or anyone that doesn't applaud homosexuality is going around focusing our efforts on telling young "gay" kids that they're substandard humans? Another one of the unreasonable arguments to demonize heterosexuals who do not applaud homosexuality. In what statement have I suggested anything about preaching such a message to gay kids? Who in their right minds would say such harsh things to kids. You guys consistently make up or conclude the most off the wall sh*t in your prhomo-sexual defenses. What about the confusion homosexuality is causing for straight kids? You don't believe kids are affected by this homosexual lifestyle promotion? This promotion of homosexuality has nothing to do with rights, gay people are not a disadvantaged people. It's strictly a marketing campaign that's surely having an effect on increasing the numbers.Originally posted by wake4law_cane4life:
Originally posted by Azar:
My stance causes irreparable harm to gay youth? Really? Please explain, how might my views harm the "gay" youth? How many of these gay youthful people are there do you think? Why do you believe the percentages of homosexuality amongst the youth are all of sudden increasing? Think this "gay" gene is all of sudden popping up more?
Yes, I do. When young people are told, in essence, they are substandard human beings it has a variety of psychological consequences in them. It's not really hard to understand that. And homosexuality amongst youth is not increasing and I challenge you to show me one legit, reputable study that says that it is. What you will find is that the incidence of people being willing to REPORT that they are homosexual is increasing. It again should not be surprising that more people are willing to identify themselves as homosexuals publicly or in a study now than 60 years ago.