Just going to drop this right here
- Thread starter CashvilleCane1
- Start date
This is a wasted thread. The Feds are simply saying, we got bigger fish to fry like Trump inciting an insurrection and his continued lies about the election.
Missed this part in the release could you please provide full release where you read this. Because the way I read it they say they found no proof of ANY VIOLATION.
Last edited:
Watch MSM and not fake news from right wing propaganda news outlets.
So that’s a no, you just like the Election Committee can’t provide any evidence. I guess the difference here is even though it’s taken years they finally admit it. You on the other hand just spew nonsense in perpetuity. Surprised the election committee didn’t go to MSM to get proof
So would rather have a President banging porn stars or a President that sniffs hair and nuzzles young girls who has a son that smoked crack cocaine? It's a no brainer.😜😜
MSM is the fake news that clowns keep slurping the cool aid from
Are you saying we should take Chris Coumo seriously? Or Don Lemon, Chuck Todd, Jim Acosta, Anderson Cooper. Dayshift Jen Psaki, Al Sharpton, Maxine Waters, WAPO, NYT, NBC, CNN, MSNBC and others just proven to have provided FALSE information about Rudy Guiliani?
You tell us CEMS, what do you believe are credible and trustworthy sources of information?
Trump wasn’t banging porn stars while President. I can think of a couple other Presidents that have sexual affairs while in office.
There's another side to this that is just or EVEN more important, just ask any investigator or the investigated,,,,,,,,, The suspension of your civil rights, while being investigated. If and When all the investigations come up Empty, who is responsible, who will pay for wrongfully violating a citizens rights for what appears 5yrs and counting? If they are doing this to a president while elected and now continue as a privet citizen,,,,,,,, Who cant they do it to ? I hope that genii gets back in the bottle
Let me think... Hannity and the other clowns on Fox Fake News?
2 years ago Trump hadn't lost an election and then incited a riot at the Capitol. Pay attention.
Last edited:
You're so gullible. Dems would love for a twice impeached ex-president who is facing time in jail for corruption is your nominee. Bring him on!
You know this Impeached stuff is ridiculous coming from an adult, If you're saying he was impeached because the House ACCUSED him, you should ALSO note the House Did Not Prove it's Case and was AQUITED each time by the SENATE. You do realize BOTH House and Senate HAVE to Find the alleged Guilty, it kills me an ADULT can be so ignorant , or even worce you could knowingly be lying , which makes you a DucheBag
Do you know what impeachment means? The House is the only body that can impeach. Not the senate. It's like an indictment. Meaning, there was enough evidence to bring that POS to trial. The Senate determines if he's removed from office. Period!! Know the facts before opening your pie hole.
It means shitt unless the senate votes to outs a potus...
Means... 00000000
CEMS it involves BOTH House and Senate. There is only 1 way to Remove (ie Impeach ) a sitting President , which requires both chambers of Congress (the house AND the senate) , one to bring the charges and the other to preside and ratify the judgment. This is part of the Checks and Balances that are integral to the frame work of OUR Government, a Democratic Republic. This is high school Civics, and I would think you would know about this before you talk like an authority on the subject.
What you are referring to was a political farce. Do you not think ANY accused in our legal system would be afforded (mandated more like it) representation?
DID YOU SEE ANY LAWYERS DEFENDING Pres. Trump in the House presentation of charges ??? ??? In ANY of the Impeachments for that matter?????????? ?????????? DID THE SENATE even Convene ??????? Remember Bill Clinton ?? Didn't he have lawyers??????
What the Dems did was political theater designed for public consumption/elections, and not for the legal system, which explains why Pres. Trump was Denied so much of his Civil Rights. If I were you I would be pissed my political party lied and made me look like a fool
What you are referring to was a political farce. Do you not think ANY accused in our legal system would be afforded (mandated more like it) representation?
DID YOU SEE ANY LAWYERS DEFENDING Pres. Trump in the House presentation of charges ??? ??? In ANY of the Impeachments for that matter?????????? ?????????? DID THE SENATE even Convene ??????? Remember Bill Clinton ?? Didn't he have lawyers??????
What the Dems did was political theater designed for public consumption/elections, and not for the legal system, which explains why Pres. Trump was Denied so much of his Civil Rights. If I were you I would be pissed my political party lied and made me look like a fool
He doesn't understand.CEMS it involves BOTH House and Senate. There is only 1 way to Remove (ie Impeach ) a sitting President , which requires both chambers of Congress (the house AND the senate) , one to bring the charges and the other to preside and ratify the judgment. This is part of the Checks and Balances that are integral to the frame work of OUR Government, a Democratic Republic. This is high school Civics, and I would think you would know about this before you talk like an authority on the subject.
What you are referring to was a political farce. Do you not think ANY accused in our legal system would be afforded (mandated more like it) representation?
DID YOU SEE ANY LAWYERS DEFENDING Pres. Trump in the House presentation of charges ??? ??? In ANY of the Impeachments for that matter?????????? ?????????? DID THE SENATE even Convene ??????? Remember Bill Clinton ?? Didn't he have lawyers??????
What the Dems did was political theater designed for public consumption/elections, and not for the legal system, which explains why Pres. Trump was Denied so much of his Civil Rights. If I were you I would be pissed my political party lied and made me look like a fool
And an indictment is far and away worse than a house vote to impeach . Key word is to and the fact that an indictment is a brought forward through a justice system and an impeachment on party line is a joke it’s political .
It just amazes me the naïveté of people that watch the way it happened and actually believe there was any legitimacy.
Slurpers
You seem to think an indictment is no big deal especially when you're guilty as Trump was. I rather not be indicted. With the exception of Romney those Republican senators had no courage to do the right thing.
We are talking about potus ... Being impeached by the house means nothing its like giving some one a jay walking ticket BFD...
Cems I can indict you as being honest and intelligent, but it means NOTHING without Proof,,,,,,, get it,,,,,,,,,,
it's the difference between being found Guilty then proving your innocence ( this is the old French system found now in hati/ santo domingo/ cuba/ etc) where someone goes to the police and accuses you of something, then they arrest the person and has to prove his/her innocence. This results in miscarriage of justice for more reasons than I want to keep typing lol.
Then there is our system, where you are Innocent until PROVEN guilty. What you keep repeating and thinking is true IS NOT , because you have Crowned Him Guilty by your own Measure, Without Substantiated PROOF, and what's worse you don't apply YOUR Same Logic🤪 evenly . Basically you see that with Fascist Cems
it's the difference between being found Guilty then proving your innocence ( this is the old French system found now in hati/ santo domingo/ cuba/ etc) where someone goes to the police and accuses you of something, then they arrest the person and has to prove his/her innocence. This results in miscarriage of justice for more reasons than I want to keep typing lol.
Then there is our system, where you are Innocent until PROVEN guilty. What you keep repeating and thinking is true IS NOT , because you have Crowned Him Guilty by your own Measure, Without Substantiated PROOF, and what's worse you don't apply YOUR Same Logic🤪 evenly . Basically you see that with Fascist Cems
Trump is the 3rd prez to be impeached. He is the first to be impeached twice. Those are facts. No way around that.CEMS it involves BOTH House and Senate. There is only 1 way to Remove (ie Impeach ) a sitting President , which requires both chambers of Congress (the house AND the senate) , one to bring the charges and the other to preside and ratify the judgment. This is part of the Checks and Balances that are integral to the frame work of OUR Government, a Democratic Republic. This is high school Civics, and I would think you would know about this before you talk like an authority on the subject.
What you are referring to was a political farce. Do you not think ANY accused in our legal system would be afforded (mandated more like it) representation?
DID YOU SEE ANY LAWYERS DEFENDING Pres. Trump in the House presentation of charges ??? ??? In ANY of the Impeachments for that matter?????????? ?????????? DID THE SENATE even Convene ??????? Remember Bill Clinton ?? Didn't he have lawyers??????
What the Dems did was political theater designed for public consumption/elections, and not for the legal system, which explains why Pres. Trump was Denied so much of his Civil Rights. If I were you I would be pissed my political party lied and made me look like a fool
so it's lalalala as you 🙈🙉 well don't let anyone get in the way of a good delusion. party on dude🥳🤪🥳
Hey cems since you know,,,,,,,,, why is it the other 2 actually went to the Senate and actually had lawyers to provide a defense ? please enlighten us
Hey cems since you know,,,,,,,,, why is it the other 2 actually went to the Senate and actually had lawyers to provide a defense ? please enlighten us
Last edited:
Similar threads
