ADVERTISEMENT

"Lovefest"

There was no "coverup" and the evidence was presented to the public. A thorough investigation was done and officials examined video footage posted on social media, statements from the officer involved and other officers and witnesses to the events, physical evidence from the scene of the shooting and the results of an autopsy. The findings and final determination were all released to the public and readily available for you to read.
Name of the shooter?
 
Name of the shooter?
C'mon Central17, you're being ridiculous now. What possible purpose would be served by naming the shooter? It would be a death warrant and accomplish nothing more than putting a target on his back1
 
Prove what you say.
It's already been proven you idiot. What a lame phukin response. Didn't you see the gallows they built where they wanted to hang Pence? Didn't you see the thugs breaking glass and storming into the Capital? If that's the best response you can come up with, you should just stay silent!
 
Last edited:
It's already been proven you idiot. What a lame phukin response. Didn't you see the gallows they built where they wanted to hang Pence? Didn't you see the thugs breaking glass and storming into the Capital? If that's the best response you can come up with, you should just stay silent!

So Madonna ranting about blowing up the White House is proof also. You actually think these protesters were there to hang Pence. If it’s proven as you say why aren’t they charged with it ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mahb and central17
C'mon Central17, you're being ridiculous now. What possible purpose would be served by naming the shooter? It would be a death warrant and accomplish nothing more than putting a target on his back1
Did you ask Lebron James that question after he falsely accused and named a cop on twitter. The cops actions were proven to the world to be a justified shooting in Ohio?
 
Last edited:
Did you ask Lebron James that question after the proven to the world to be a justified shooting in Ohio?
Quit deflecting. I'm asking you. What purpose would be served by naming the shooter other than putting a target on his back?
 
Last edited:
So Madonna ranting about blowing up the White House is proof also. You actually think these protesters were there to hang Pence. If it’s proven as you say why aren’t they charged with it ?
Have you seen none of the videos? They built gallows and were yelling, "Hang Pence, Hang Pence". I take that as an indication of their intentions. 563 people have been charged so far. Answer one question. Why? Why are you defending these thugs?
 
Have you seen none of the videos? They built gallows and were yelling, "Hang Pence, Hang Pence". I take that as an indication of their intentions. 563 people have been charged so far. Answer one question. Why? Why are you defending these thugs?

What were they charged with ? You say it’s been proven. I ask what’s been proven ? By who ? Where is report on gallows ? You make it up as you go along, nothing new though, you also said you never posted Trump was indicted.
 
What were they charged with ? You say it’s been proven. I ask what’s been proven ? By who ? Where is report on gallows ? You make it up as you go along, nothing new though, you also said you never posted Trump was indicted.
They have been charged with disorderly conduct, trespass, destruction of property and assault. The gallows have been shown on numerous videos. Why haven't you seen them? I ask again, why are you defending these thugs? I haven't made up anything. These charges can be easily verified!
 
Last edited:
They have been charged with disorderly conduct, trespass, destruction of property and assault. The gallows have been shown on numerous videos. Why haven't you seen them? I ask again, why are you defending these thugs?

As I stated earlier, let’s let this play out. I think there’s more to it than we’re seeing and being told. Some of these people walk in right by guards and not doing anything violent yet still charged. This is probably the most surveilled building but Government won’t release tapes. Head of Oath Keepers not charged. Something doesn’t smell right.
 
They have been charged with disorderly conduct, trespass, destruction of property and assault. The gallows have been shown on numerous videos. Why haven't you seen them? I ask again, why are you defending these thugs?
You post a lot of your opinions stated as fact. When questioned, you routinely say "it is out there". If it is out there what is so difficult about a simple link, cut and paste, etc, to validate your position? Maybe you believe your own lies, but intelligent people that do their own "fact checking" do not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mahb and ZEKEMUG
I asked GoCub this same question and he never had the courage to answer. If you believe that Ashli Babbit's shooting was justified because she was trespassing, do you also agree that armed citizens and police can "Tony Montana" all looters? The looters are committing trespass, robbery and a whole host of other crimes. It will be interested to read your response?
She was trespassing at the US Capitol while the Government was in session. You cant even compare and your POS EX president condoned it.
 
You post a lot of your opinions stated as fact. When questioned, you routinely say "it is out there". If it is out there what is so difficult about a simple link, cut and paste, etc, to validate your position? Maybe you believe your own lies, but intelligent people that do their own "fact checking" do not.
More BS and deflection. I do not post opinion as fact and have never said, "it is out there". To be honest, I don't know how to "cut and paste, etc". Never found it necessary to learn how. Answer the phukin question!
 
As I stated earlier, let’s let this play out. I think there’s more to it than we’re seeing and being told. Some of these people walk in right by guards and not doing anything violent yet still charged. This is probably the most surveilled building but Government won’t release tapes. Head of Oath Keepers not charged. Something doesn’t smell right.
First you asked for charges, so I listed them. Now you say some people did nothing violent yet still charged. What don't you understand about the charge "trespass"? The Government did release tapes but some were delayed as they were being studied to identify attackers. 16 members Of Oath Keepers have been indicted. Again, why are you defending these thugs?
 
Last edited:
She was trespassing at the US Capitol while the Government was in session. You cant even compare and your POS EX president condoned it.
So are you saying that trespassing is a crime that merits "shoot to kill" the perpetrator?
 
Last edited:
First you asked for charges, so I listed them. Now you say some people did nothing violent yet still charged. What don't you understand about the charge "trespass"? The Government did release tapes but some were delayed as they were being studied to identify attackers. 16 members Of Oath Keepers have been indicted. Again, why are you defending these thugs?
Looked up Oath Keepers charges couldn’t find trespass. Again you state things as facts. You keep saying I’m defending them show me where.

Hackett, Dolan, Isaacs and Walden are each charged with conspiracy, obstruction of an official proceeding and aiding and abetting, and entering and remaining on restricted grounds. Hackett, Dolan and Isaacs are also charged with destruction of government property and aiding and abetting. Isaacs is also charged with civil disorder and aiding and abetting as well as assaulting, resisting or impeding certain officers.

The superseding indictment adds charges for previously arrested defendants, including Joshua James, charged with one count of obstruction of justice and assaulting and interfering with law enforcement in addition to conspiracy, civil disorder and other allegations. As alleged, James deleted evidence of offenses from his cell phone and assaulted Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) officers who blocked his path into the Capitol Rotunda.

Kelly Meggs and Kenneth Harrelson are additionally charged with one count of obstruction of justice for deleting evidence of these offenses from their cell phones.

Donovan Crowl, Jessica Watkins, Sandra Parker, Graydon Young and William Isaacs are jointly charged with one count of interfering with law enforcement during a civil disorder and aiding and abetting for helping to push a crowd into MPD riot police officers who had formed a line blocking the hallway that leads from the rotunda north towards the Senate chamber.​
 
She was trespassing at the US Capitol while the Government was in session. You cant even compare and your POS EX president condoned it.

Oath Keepers communications from 1/6 released because of FOI Lawsuit. They say Trump won’t initiate, insurrection act, so we have too. Also say Trump is telling people to go home in peace. Don’t let facts get in the way of your narrative. Amazing it takes a lawsuit to get near the truth.
 
Looked up Oath Keepers charges couldn’t find trespass. Again you state things as facts. You keep saying I’m defending them show me where.

Hackett, Dolan, Isaacs and Walden are each charged with conspiracy, obstruction of an official proceeding and aiding and abetting, and entering and remaining on restricted grounds. Hackett, Dolan and Isaacs are also charged with destruction of government property and aiding and abetting. Isaacs is also charged with civil disorder and aiding and abetting as well as assaulting, resisting or impeding certain officers.

The superseding indictment adds charges for previously arrested defendants, including Joshua James, charged with one count of obstruction of justice and assaulting and interfering with law enforcement in addition to conspiracy, civil disorder and other allegations. As alleged, James deleted evidence of offenses from his cell phone and assaulted Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) officers who blocked his path into the Capitol Rotunda.

Kelly Meggs and Kenneth Harrelson are additionally charged with one count of obstruction of justice for deleting evidence of these offenses from their cell phones.

Donovan Crowl, Jessica Watkins, Sandra Parker, Graydon Young and William Isaacs are jointly charged with one count of interfering with law enforcement during a civil disorder and aiding and abetting for helping to push a crowd into MPD riot police officers who had formed a line blocking the hallway that leads from the rotunda north towards the Senate chamber.​
Your whole narrative has been in defense of these people-"None of these people did nothing violent yet still charged, Government won't release tapes.Head of Oath Keepers not charged, something doesn't smell right. That's a few of your comments. You didn't find trespass because the trespass charges were worded as "entering restricted grounds of the Capital". Again, why are you defending these thugs? Could it be because they were there to support Trumps "Big Lie" to "Stop the Steal"? Face reality, Zeke. Your Dear Leader is a corrupt POS and will never be re-elected!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: gokcub
The sky is falling eh?
Go find a safe zone, you political pussy.
Your and media’s dim witted view is now being exposed.
Overhyped bull shit.
Dems comparing 1/6, to 9/11.
****tards!
The sky is falling eh?
Go find a safe zone, you political pussy.
Your and media’s dim witted view is now being exposed.
Overhyped bull shit.
Dems comparing 1/6, to 9/11.
****tards!
overhyped. Lol ok. Did I upset you. Do you need a ****ing tissue. You trump idiot believe anything he says. Sucker. I’m not a Democrat fool. Just not a trump slurper.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gokcub
Re:
The officer was fearful of his life. All those lunatics trying to bust through. If that was your home I’m sure you would have done the same.
Most can agree on the validity of defending one's self when being in of life. I have no problem with that.

But when a Cop or citizen does that an investigation is held to confirm that was the case and they had reasonable fear. The information and evidence are reviewed. If the shooters actions are not appropropriate, then charges are filed. My issue with the Ashli Babbit shooting is why the coverup? Why not publically present the evidence, show that the shooting is justified and take the subject off the table? Until that is done many are going to wonder who is hiding what?
They are probably keeping the officers name private because once they name him his life will be in danger from the deranged trump lunatics. Makes sense to me. Trump caused this and should be held accountable. Facts are facts. Listen to the idiot speak.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gokcub
They are probably keeping the officers name private because once they name him his life will be in danger from the deranged trump lunatics. Makes sense to me. Trump caused this and should be held accountable. Facts are facts. Listen to the idiot speak.
I will ask you the same question I asked MiamiMike and he dodged. While understanding the concept of privacy, why was Lebron not condemned for tweeting all kinds of information about the Ohio cop who saved a young woman's life by shooting her attacker? And if naming a shooter puts that person in danger, than shouldn't Lebron be charged with a crime? Please be intellectually honest and first address in a singular fashion the question about Lebron tweeting about the Ohio cop? Then you are welcome to go off about how Trump and his supporters are deplorable.
Thank you,
 
Your whole narrative has been in defense of these people-"None of these people did nothing violent yet still charged, Government won't release tapes.Head of Oath Keepers not charged, something doesn't smell right. That's a few of your comments. You didn't find trespass because the trespass charges were worded as "entering restricted grounds of the Capital". Again, why are you defending these thugs? Could it be because they were there to support Trumps "Big Lie" to "Stop the Steal"? Face reality, Zeke. Your Dear Leader is a corrupt POS and will never be re-elected!

No wrong again counselor there is a federal trespass statute that’s not what their charged with. I’m sorry that all this goes over your head and you don’t understand the reasoning for the different charges. I never said none of these people did nothing violent ( BTW Great use of double negative ). Maybe you’re the idiot that you called me. Take a reading comprehension course it will help.

Search Results

Featured snippet from the web​

Anytime you unlawfully enter land owned by the Federal government, you could face federal trespassing charges. From national forests to federal office complexes, to military bases, the US government owns vast areas of land across America.
 
Last edited:
No wrong again counselor there is a federal trespass statute that’s not what their charged with. I’m sorry that all this goes over your head and you don’t understand the reasoning for the different charges. I never said none of these people did nothing violent ( BTW Great use of double negative ). Maybe you’re the idiot that you called me. Take a reading comprehension course it will help.

Search Results

Featured snippet from the web​

Anytime you unlawfully enter land owned by the Federal government, you could face federal trespassing charges. From national forests to federal office complexes, to military bases, the US government owns vast areas of land across America.
OK Zeke, what you said is "people walk in right by guards and not doing anything violent yet still charged". And please explain the difference in meaning of "entering restricted grounds of the Capital" and "anytime you unlawfully enter land owned by the Federal government". You're mincing words here Zeke and if you're not defending the rioters, then what have we been debating all this time?
 
Last edited:
OK Zeke, what you said is "people walk in right by guards and not doing anything violent yet still charged". And please explain the difference in meaning of "entering restricted grounds of the Capital" and "anytime you unlawfully enter land owned by the Federal government".

The difference is they are not charged with the crime of trespassing like you stated. There is a big difference None of these people and some. Sorry you either can’t read but more probable is TDS.
 
she was shot while trying to force entry into a restricted area and disregarding multiple police orders to stop. It was also later found that she had posted threats on social media to Democratic elected officials. What was she doing storming the Capital? We are not governed by mob rule. She may have been a Vet but she was dishonoring her Country by attacking its Capital and you're trying to make martyrs out of these criminals!

Like George Floyd?
 
The difference is they are not charged with the crime of trespassing like you stated. There is a big difference None of these people and some. Sorry you either can’t read but more probable is TDS.
You're right, I said they were charged with trespassing which means the act of being present on another's land without lawful excuse. The actual charge was- Knowing Entering or Remaining in any Restricted Building or Ground without Lawful Authority. If you're going to nitpick over something that minor then I think we've about exhausted this debate. Take care Zeke and don't let your arm hang over the side of the bed! You never know what may be lurking there.
 
Last edited:
OK Zeke, what you said is "people walk in right by guards and not doing anything violent yet still charged". And please explain the difference in meaning of "entering restricted grounds of the Capital" and "anytime you unlawfully enter land owned by the Federal government". You're mincing words here Zeke and if you're not defending the rioters, then what have we been debating all this time?
Amazed at how ignorant a person can be. So a bunch of “‘carried away” protestors walked into the Capital.
Get over it, Dem fuktards like you need to stop comparing 1/6 to 9/11
Go find a safe zone under a bridge you soft as shit Pussy
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreakingCane
Amazed at how ignorant a person can be. So a bunch of “‘carried away” protestors walked into the Capital.
Get over it, Dem fuktards like you need to stop comparing 1/6 to 9/11
Go find a safe zone under a bridge you soft as shit Pussy
You're the only person in this thread who has mentioned 9/11 and this was the first time the US Capital had been breached since the British attacked and burned the building in 1814. Downplay it all you want but that's the reality! And the "carried away" protestors didn't just walk into the Capital. They smashed their way in and were threatening to kill people!
 
Last edited:
OK Zeke, what you said is "people walk in right by guards and not doing anything violent yet still charged". And please explain the difference in meaning of "entering restricted grounds of the Capital" and "anytime you unlawfully enter land owned by the Federal government". You're mincing words here Zeke and if you're not defending the rioters, then what have we been debating all this time?
Portland and Minneapolis riots. Antifa and BLM?
 
You're the only person in this thread who has mentioned 9/11 and this was the first time the US Capital had been breached since the British attacked and burned the building in 1814. Downplay it all you want but that's the reality! And the "carried away" protestors didn't just walk into the Capital. They smashed their way in and were threatening to kill people!
Lil Mikey of course Im gonna down play protestors averaging middle age. that got carried away.
Fuk off with “being attacked”
How fkn ignorant can you be!
Pffft
 
You're the only person in this thread who has mentioned 9/11 and this was the first time the US Capital had been breached since the British attacked and burned the building in 1814. Downplay it all you want but that's the reality! And the "carried away" protestors didn't just walk into the Capital. They smashed their way in and were threatening to kill people!
Would the 1983 bombing of the US Capitol by leftist terrorists, including BLM fundraiser Susan Rosenberg, not be considered a breach? There was also a bombing of the Senate wing of the Capitol in 1971. Of course, there was also the 2018 Capitol incident when nearly 300 were arrested trying to disrupt the Supreme Court confirmation hearing of Brett Kavanaugh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: majus12
C'mon Central17, you're being ridiculous now. What possible purpose would be served by naming the shooter? It would be a death warrant and accomplish nothing more than putting a target on his back1
Public record in a public building
 
I notice this was ignored. These bucked toothed donkeys want it both ways!
Wrong dipshyt. It was ignored because the two situations are not comparable! George Floyd was on the ground subdued. Babbit was breaking and entering with intent to do harm. The officer who killed Floyd was torturing him. The officer who shot Babbit was fearful for his life. Chauvin was sent to prison. The officer who shot Babbit was not charged. So tell me how these incidents were comparable!
 
Last edited:
Would the 1983 bombing of the US Capitol by leftist terrorists, including BLM fundraiser Susan Rosenberg, not be considered a breach? There was also a bombing of the Senate wing of the Capitol in 1971. Of course, there was also the 2018 Capitol incident when nearly 300 were arrested trying to disrupt the Supreme Court confirmation hearing of Brett Kavanaugh.
Please 801 FACTS don’t count
 
Wrong dipshyt. It was ignored because the two situations are not comparable! George Floyd was on the ground subdued. Babbit was breaking and entering with intent to do harm. The officer who killed Floyd was torturing him. The officer who shot Babbit was fearful for his life. Chauvin was sent to prison. The officer who shot Babbit was not charged. So tell me how these incidents were comparable!
I would like to hear the Officer (or member of a democrat congress person's private security detail?) tell their story. We could all learn from it? The Capitol is the peoples' property, we deserve to know what happened on the property we pay for.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT