ADVERTISEMENT

Republican Led Bipartisan Juneteenth Federal Holiday Bill Signed Into Law!

Once again, you've shown your blatant bigotry....Just can't stay out of your own way can you. Instead of calling it what it is, you try and justify obvious bigotry.

And you still won't answer the question will you, regarding the situation if it were Obama who did it.

The racism was towards blacks, that is what we're talking about. And I take it, you'd like us to believe there were no qualified black judges he could have appointed.
Gotta love the guy MLK was trying to get his message to, but failed. Your bigotry shows each post. You want judged in based on skin color, not merit of their careers. Thanks for admitting this. Waiting for your same argument on the NBA to start more “whites.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: majus12
Gotta love the guy MLK was trying to get his message to, but failed. Your bigotry shows each post. You want judged in based on skin color, not merit of their careers. Thanks for admitting this. Waiting for your same argument on the NBA to start more “whites.”
You are a funny guy.....it's interesting how you try so hard to flip the script when you get exposed for what you are. News flash......identifying someone as a racist or bigot, does not constitute bigotry on behalf of the person making the allegation. That's not how it works.....you need substance to make the allegation, not some childish "you called me one, so you're one", BS.

Make your point with substance my friend....if you say or suggest I'm something, justify it with evidence. If I've displayed a racial bias against ANYONE, justify it with evidence, as I've done with you. But because I point out bigotry, that doesn't suggest bigotry on my part....but I'm sure you already know this, it's just your way of again, deflecting and evading the real truths.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_xwhflco81xrbt
You are a funny guy.....it's interesting how you try so hard to flip the script when you get exposed for what you are. News flash......identifying someone as a racist or bigot, does not constitute bigotry on behalf of the person making the allegation. That's not how it works.....you need substance to make the allegation, not some childish "you called me one, so you're one", BS.

Make your point with substance my friend....if you say or suggest I'm something, justify it with evidence. If I've displayed a racial bias against ANYONE, justify it with evidence, as I've done with you. But because I point out bigotry, that doesn't suggest bigotry on my part....but I'm sure you already know this, it's just your way of again, deflecting and evading the real truths.
I don't know who is racist or who isn't racist. I think it's mostly all absurdity at this point but I do know if a person supports things like Critical Race Theory taught to our children of every color that is racist. The supporters are racist BECAUSE teaching children that are White that they are inherently racist and oppressors and teaching Black children that they are victims of the White oppressors' is so wrong on so many levels. I have no problem teaching children to love one another in a positive way but CRT falls far away from that worthy goal.
 
You are a funny guy.....it's interesting how you try so hard to flip the script when you get exposed for what you are. News flash......identifying someone as a racist or bigot, does not constitute bigotry on behalf of the person making the allegation. That's not how it works.....you need substance to make the allegation, not some childish "you called me one, so you're one", BS.

Make your point with substance my friend....if you say or suggest I'm something, justify it with evidence. If I've displayed a racial bias against ANYONE, justify it with evidence, as I've done with you. But because I point out bigotry, that doesn't suggest bigotry on my part....but I'm sure you already know this, it's just your way of again, deflecting and evading the real truths.
Hilarious that the guy asking for substance responds to all posts calling someone a racist with zero substance. Thanks for exposing your hypocrisy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: majus12
I don't know who is racist or who isn't racist. I think it's mostly all absurdity at this point but I do know if a person supports things like Critical Race Theory taught to our children of every color that is racist. The supporters are racist BECAUSE teaching children that are White that they are inherently racist and oppressors and teaching Black children that they are victims of the White oppressors' is so wrong on so many levels. I have no problem teaching children to love one another in a positive way but CRT falls far away from that worthy goal.
I actually agree with you on the premise that teaching a child who is white that they are inherently racist or the oppressors of anyone, or teaching black children that they are victims of white oppressors, is wrong. However, this country's history and ALL of it should be taught to all students in this country, and should that cast a negative light on ANY race for that time period, so be it. It shouldn't be omitted or sugar coated for the sake of our children's understanding.

And as I've said before, children aren't born racist or bigots, they get taught this behavior in most cases by their parents. So it's incumbent upon the parents to teach the kids to respect ALL people regardless of the differences. We're not going to always "love" one another, and I don't think that's required, but respect and FAIR and EQUAL treatment, of everyone is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_xwhflco81xrbt
Hilarious that the guy asking for substance responds to all posts calling someone a racist with zero substance. Thanks for exposing your hypocrisy.
Says the guy who can't even bring himself to answer a simple question regarding Obama doing exactly what Trump did in the appointing of judges. Your refusal to acknowledge blatant bigotry directed at blacks, is just the most recent substance. You'd rather believe there are no blacks judges who are qualified, than to admit Trump's bigotry.
 
Last edited:
Says the guy who can't even bring himself to answer a simple question regarding Obama doing exactly what Trump did in the appointing of judges. Your refusal to acknowledge blatant bigotry directed at blacks, is just the most recent substance.
Such lies. You get all riled up about Republicans leading this Juneteenth effort, beginning with Trump, leaving Obama behind, and then you deflect.
 
Such lies. You get all riled up about Republicans leading this Juneteenth effort, beginning with Trump, leaving Obama behind, and then you deflect.
WHAT????? Once again you've chosen to deflect to hide the obvious. Be a man and call it what it is.....Call right, right AND wrong, wrong.....regardless of the actors. That's why you and the other Trump slurpers have ZERO credibility, you can't call shyt what it is, you'd rather cover it up and pretend it's not shyt despite the stench.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: anon_xwhflco81xrbt
WHAT!!!!! Once again you've chosen to deflect to hide the obvious. Be a man and call it what it is.....Call right, right AND wrong, wrong.....regardless of the actors. That's why you and the other Trump slurpers have ZERO credibility, you can't call shyt what it is, you'd rather cover it up and pretend it's not shyt despite the stench.
So triggered snowflake
 
I actually agree with you on the premise that teaching a child who is white that they are inherently racist or the oppressors of anyone, or teaching black children that they are victims of white oppressors, is wrong. However, this country's history and ALL of it should be taught to all students in this country, and should that cast a negative light on ANY race for that time period, so be it. It shouldn't be omitted or sugar coated for the sake of our children's understanding.

And as I've said before, children aren't born racist or bigots, they get taught this behavior in most cases by their parents. So it's incumbent upon the parents to teach the kids to respect ALL people regardless of the differences. We're not going to always "love" one another, and I don't think that's required, but respect and FAIR and EQUAL treatment, of everyone is.
Correct ALL history should be taught.
Not the Progressive right’s cancel culture BS history.
Amazed at how ignorant, liberal, teachers want to CHANGE history, not teach what was
 
I actually agree with you on the premise that teaching a child who is white that they are inherently racist or the oppressors of anyone, or teaching black children that they are victims of white oppressors, is wrong. However, this country's history and ALL of it should be taught to all students in this country, and should that cast a negative light on ANY race for that time period, so be it. It shouldn't be omitted or sugar coated for the sake of our children's understanding.

And as I've said before, children aren't born racist or bigots, they get taught this behavior in most cases by their parents. So it's incumbent upon the parents to teach the kids to respect ALL people regardless of the differences. We're not going to always "love" one another, and I don't think that's required, but respect and FAIR and EQUAL treatment, of everyone is.
I AGREE 100% that the way a child is raised and how they are reared / taught about other people is the KEY component towards respecting one another. 100% I don't know nor have heard of any school district in the nation that does not teach American History and omits the civil war, the reasons behind the Civil War, the scar of slavery, the aftermath of slavery etc......If there is a school district out there leaving that out of their curriculum I would love to know which district or school? I am positive some teach it deeper and better than others but that can be said about any course or any teacher. If there is room for improvement I wouldn't object.
 
Correct ALL history should be taught.
Not the Progressive right’s cancel culture BS history.
Amazed at how ignorant, liberal, teachers want to CHANGE history, not teach what was
Progressive right???
 
I AGREE 100% that the way a child is raised and how they are reared / taught about other people is the KEY component towards respecting one another. 100% I don't know nor have heard of any school district in the nation that does not teach American History and omits the civil war, the reasons behind the Civil War, the scar of slavery, the aftermath of slavery etc......If there is a school district out there leaving that out of their curriculum I would love to know which district or school? I am positive some teach it deeper and better than others but that can be said about any course or any teacher. If there is room for improvement I wouldn't object.
There is a limited amount of time that these teachers have to teach all the important events in American history. What should be emphasized as an event and what should be just mentioned is determined by the school district and school books that are being used for various grades.
So, what do you de- emphasize as an event versus emphasizing Black history and slavery at it pertains to U.S. history? Do you de - emphasize the revolutionary war or the War of 1812 or some of the subjects leading up to these events? Does aspects of the Civil War get de-emphasized to benefit a much longer discussion on slavery? Is WW1 and WW2 discussions center around the Black man's standing and involvement in these conflicts? Does the Holocaust discussion in class get eliminated or reduced in discussion for other subjects? All I am saying is if all these subjects are important, the time given to teach these historical events need to be factual and measured.
 
There is a limited amount of time that these teachers have to teach all the important events in American history. What should be emphasized as an event and what should be just mentioned is determined by the school district and school books that are being used for various grades.
So, what do you de- emphasize as an event versus emphasizing Black history and slavery at it pertains to U.S. history? Do you de - emphasize the revolutionary war or the War of 1812 or some of the subjects leading up to these events? Does aspects of the Civil War get de-emphasized to benefit a much longer discussion on slavery? Is WW1 and WW2 discussions center around the Black man's standing and involvement in these conflicts? Does the Holocaust discussion in class get eliminated or reduced in discussion for other subjects? All I am saying is if all these subjects are important, the time given to teach these historical events need to be factual and measured.
Sounds to me like we are saying the same thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allied2651
Sounds to me like we are saying the same thing.
Just emphasizing that the time in class given to these events have to be properly measured. Not just emphasizing Black history over other events when there equally important events in the timeline of U.S. history.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreakingCane
Just emphasizing that the time in class given to these events have to be properly measured. Not just emphasizing Black history over other events when there equally important events in the timeline of U.S. history.
Same thing I'm saying but different words. Namely that History being taught to kids always has to be a "wide net" approach rather than focused on the dots. You can teach kids about slavery or the holocaust without trying to teach about every single event in specificity. Naturally some major events will be taught. This is my response to those that say we ought to be teaching kids about The Tulsa Massacres etc....maybe it's in the curriculum in one school while another focuses on other events.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT