ADVERTISEMENT

Rolls grenade into the lounge and

I do find it ironic that folks who say the media is dead can't distinguish between tabloids and journalism.

What’s more ironic is how you Morons dismiss Tony Bobulinski damning eyewitness rock solid testimony naming Joe as a co conspirator in the Biden Crime family. DOJ & FBI have confirmed criminal investigation underway. If there is a track to Joes many paid for houses and his lavish living came from Hunter or Jim he is in serious criminal jeopardy. When Trump wins Tuesday look for Hunter and Jim to be indicted very soon. The Durham indictments will soon follow as well.
Get ready to fill up on Humble Pie next weeks fellas.
 
  • Like
Reactions: grbcane
NY Post and Breitbart? C’mon man.

The NY Post is the oldest news paper in the country, they’re not part of the Democrat military arm of the party, so I understand why the libs hate them. What facts do you dispute in the story? It doesn’t bother you that we don’t have a free press anymore, just one that acts as state run media for the Democrat party?
 
Ed,

Im very impressed that you’ve retained your optimism. Posts by your pro-Trump colleagues on this board have really dropped off.

Im bringing my fork next Wednesday for a big helping of humble pie if DJT wins. If he loses.....?
 
Ed,

Im very impressed that you’ve retained your optimism. Posts by your pro-Trump colleagues on this board have really dropped off.

Im bringing my fork next Wednesday for a big helping of humble pie if DJT wins. If he loses.....?
Sounds good. It won’t be close. I will send Joe Jim & Hunter a case of Old Spice Soap on the rope. They will need it where they are heading.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CashvilleCane1
Ed,

Im very impressed that you’ve retained your optimism. Posts by your pro-Trump colleagues on this board have really dropped off.

Im bringing my fork next Wednesday for a big helping of humble pie if DJT wins. If he loses.....?
I hope you enjoy a nice bottle of wine Tuesday evening to lesson your painful grief 😄😃
 
The NY Post is the oldest news paper in the country, they’re not part of the Democrat military arm of the party, so I understand why the libs hate them. What facts do you dispute in the story? It doesn’t bother you that we don’t have a free press anymore, just one that acts as state run media for the Democrat party?

‘The NY Post is part of the Rupert Murdoch right wing media empire that stretches from his native Australia to the UK and on to the US. His papers and TV networks make no attempt to hide Murdoch’s point of view.

The Wall St. Journal editorial board (way more conservative than the WSJ reporters) published a long opinion piece today on Trump. They stated that Trump deserves to be re-elected because of his policies and accomplishments. But, they feared that he would be only the third incumbant President in 90 years to lose. Why? His character/tweets/behavior/rants etc. have turned much of the country against him. The WSJ concludes that if Trump loses, he only has one person to blame....himself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_xwhflco81xrbt
‘I’ve bought a fancy bottle of French Champagne for the evening. If Joe wins, I’ll drink it. If Trump wins, I’ll hit myself over the head with it.
That’s very funny. I will make another prediction by 10pm EST 7pm your time you will be cracking open the Hard Stuff Irish Whiskey when FL GA NC OH IA have all been called for Trump and PA WI MI MN numbers will be looking very favorable for Trump as well. Hopefully you will see that the Fake News Propagandist & Activist media have pulled another one over on you and you will start to take a harder look at the swamp and the deep state. This is a real issue that could turn against your side very easily one day. The Corrupt Media,Big Tech, Our intelligence bureau, and corrupt politician like Adam Schiff are a danger to our republic. Hoping Trump really hammers them in his second term
 
  • Like
Reactions: CashvilleCane1
‘The NY Post is part of the Rupert Murdoch right wing media empire that stretches from his native Australia to the UK and on to the US. His papers and TV networks make no attempt to hide Murdoch’s point of view.

The Wall St. Journal editorial board (way more conservative than the WSJ reporters) published a long opinion piece today on Trump. They stated that Trump deserves to be re-elected because of his policies and accomplishments. But, they feared that he would be only the third incumbant President in 90 years to lose. Why? His character/tweets/behavior/rants etc. have turned much of the country against him. The WSJ concludes that if Trump loses, he only has one person to blame....himself.

Your weights sink way to the left when evaluating news sources. I’ll ask again state run media for the Democrat party doesn’t bother you? For years the WSJ editorial section has moved In a left direction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mahb
That’s very funny. I will make another prediction by 10pm EST 7pm your time you will be cracking open the Hard Stuff Irish Whiskey when FL GA NC OH IA have all been called for Trump and PA WI MI MN numbers will be looking very favorable for Trump as well. Hopefully you will see that the Fake News Propagandist & Activist media have pulled another one over on you and you will start to take a harder look at the swamp and the deep state. This is a real issue that could turn against your side very easily one day. The Corrupt Media,Big Tech, Our intelligence bureau, and corrupt politician like Adam Schiff are a danger to our republic. Hoping Trump really hammers them in his second term

ed,

you haven’t mentioned what you’ll be eating/drinking if DJT does indeed go down. Lemme know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_xwhflco81xrbt
Your weights sink way to the left when evaluating news sources. I’ll ask again state run media for the Democrat party doesn’t bother you? For years the WSJ editorial section has moved In a left direction.
Your weights sink way to the left when evaluating news sources. I’ll ask again state run media for the Democrat party doesn’t bother you? For years the WSJ editorial section has moved In a left direction.

grb,

I don’t quite agree that the WSJ Editorial Board has trended left. I do feel that the reporting by the WSJ is more neutral than previously. In fact, earlier this year, there was a very public spat between the reporters and the Editorial Board. Reporters felt that the board was too pro Trump and far right. Board told the reporters to mind their own business and shut up. Amazing fight in print inside the WSJ.

I do agree that the media is much more polarized and opinionated than 10-20 years ago. Fox and the right wing radio hosts did not exist back in the day. One commentator concluded that Trump could not have been elected without Fox, Murdoch and the radio. In the MSM, the drift has been to the left with MSNBC, CNN, NYT, New Yorker, Atlantic, etc. I am not aware of a left leaning radio host.

Bottom line: the media are much more advocates than strictly reporters as in the 1960-90 era. Back then, you got your news from Walter Cronkite and believed him. Now, we stay in our own bubbles and don’t believe anything that’s broadcast outside of our personal bubble.
 
grb,

I don’t quite agree that the WSJ Editorial Board has trended left. I do feel that the reporting by the WSJ is more neutral than previously. In fact, earlier this year, there was a very public spat between the reporters and the Editorial Board. Reporters felt that the board was too pro Trump and far right. Board told the reporters to mind their own business and shut up. Amazing fight in print inside the WSJ.

I do agree that the media is much more polarized and opinionated than 10-20 years ago. Fox and the right wing radio hosts did not exist back in the day. One commentator concluded that Trump could not have been elected without Fox, Murdoch and the radio. In the MSM, the drift has been to the left with MSNBC, CNN, NYT, New Yorker, Atlantic, etc. I am not aware of a left leaning radio host.

Bottom line: the media are much more advocates than strictly reporters as in the 1960-90 era. Back then, you got your news from Walter Cronkite and believed him. Now, we stay in our own bubbles and don’t believe anything that’s broadcast outside of our personal bubble.


Fair enough.
 
I cross my fingers our country is not so shallow that they would prefer a person that says the nice politicly correct thing, yet has NO legislative success, has associated with racists, has passed racist policies, and has amassed a fortune under questionable circumstances in his over 40 year as a public servant, over a loud mouth confrontational millionaire businessman asshole, who has shown great perseverance, addressed his campaign promises , passed legislation that improved our ability to earn/ judicial reform/ to treat our veterans/ Nato - UN / Stopped N.Korea/ Put China in check and exposed them as our greatest threat/brought peace agreements to the middle east/ etc, etc . Basically Substance over style.
 
I cross my fingers our country is not so shallow that they would prefer a person that says the nice politicly correct thing, yet has NO legislative success, has associated with racists, has passed racist policies, and has amassed a fortune under questionable circumstances in his over 40 year as a public servant, over a loud mouth confrontational millionaire businessman asshole, who has shown great perseverance, addressed his campaign promises , passed legislation that improved our ability to earn/ judicial reform/ to treat our veterans/ Nato - UN / Stopped N.Korea/ Put China in check and exposed them as our greatest threat/brought peace agreements to the middle east/ etc, etc . Basically Substance over style.
He built that wall too!! 400miles and counting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mahb and utatem
grb,

I don’t quite agree that the WSJ Editorial Board has trended left. I do feel that the reporting by the WSJ is more neutral than previously. In fact, earlier this year, there was a very public spat between the reporters and the Editorial Board. Reporters felt that the board was too pro Trump and far right. Board told the reporters to mind their own business and shut up. Amazing fight in print inside the WSJ.

I do agree that the media is much more polarized and opinionated than 10-20 years ago. Fox and the right wing radio hosts did not exist back in the day. One commentator concluded that Trump could not have been elected without Fox, Murdoch and the radio. In the MSM, the drift has been to the left with MSNBC, CNN, NYT, New Yorker, Atlantic, etc. I am not aware of a left leaning radio host.

Bottom line: the media are much more advocates than strictly reporters as in the 1960-90 era. Back then, you got your news from Walter Cronkite and believed him. Now, we stay in our own bubbles and don’t believe anything that’s broadcast outside of our personal bubble.
You don’t understand the complexity here. Fox News took up the right wing side of the news but still maintained people within their different shows who were obviously leftwing hosts. Several of them had great careers until their liberal nuttiness hit them best of them. None have recovered from their fatal mistake.

Even to this day fox still represented both sides in their on air personalities. To the point it’s hurt their ratings a little. You’re blind to just how left your party and the media has swung.
 
  • Like
Reactions: utatem and grbcane
You don’t understand the complexity here. Fox News took up the right wing side of the news but still maintained people within their different shows who were obviously leftwing hosts. Several of them had great careers until their liberal nuttiness hit them best of them. None have recovered from their fatal mistake.

Even to this day fox still represented both sides in their on air personalities. To the point it’s hurt their ratings a little. You’re blind to just how left your party and the media has swung.

I’ve been watching Newsmax along with FOX, there are times I just can’t stomach FOX. If I wanted to watch liberal filibustering, I could always watch the fake news.
 
I’ve been watching Newsmax along with FOX, there are times I just can’t stomach FOX. If I wanted to watch liberal filibustering, I could always watch the fake news.
The left are so far left it has become lots of prognosticating and wishful thinking on their part. They just ruin tv and it’s horrible to watch. Marie Barf is one of those for me. Why she’s on Fox I’ll never understand. She openly lies and gets called out and then doubles down on the lies. Juan Williams is another one like that. Maybe liberals are that stupid I don’t know but most conservatives are not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: grbcane and edtuna
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT