ADVERTISEMENT

Scroll on down to 1938

If you have ever wondered just how f-cked up the New York Times has always been? Here you go!


Adolf Hitler

Great post. Facts are a stubborn thing. Can someone please remind me why anyone should care what the NYT has to say. And even more importantly why anyone ever should believe a NYT FACT CHECKER?

New flash, NYT circa, 1633, Galileo under threat of torture from the Vatican recants his disinformation theory that the earth revolves around the Sun. NYT sites prevailing and proven science and condenms Galileo as a conspiracy theorist seditionist against Papal supremecy..


https://www.newscientist.com/articl...ion of,seen facing his inquisitors – recanted.
 
You know Time Magazine and The New York Times aren't related at all right? Do you think the LA Times, the London Times, the New York Times, and Time Magazine are all the same thing? They aren't even owned by the same company. Do you thing the Washington Post owns Post-It Notes too?

I used to think you were just stupid, but I'm beginning to think this is performance art or something.
 
New York Times or Times magazine?

Also this is the actual cover it’s titled 'Hitler Plays the Hymn of Hate'

the portrait makes him small and highlights why he was the choice and it wasn’t positive.
1101390102_400.jpg


How does this negatively impact Time magazine or the New York Times? Seems they brought light to it before the Holocaust. Folks need to hear when hate speech is happening.
 
You know Time Magazine and The New York Times aren't related at all right? Do you think the LA Times, the London Times, the New York Times, and Time Magazine are all the same thing? They aren't even owned by the same company. Do you thing the Washington Post owns Post-It Notes too?

I used to think you were just stupid, but I'm beginning to think this is performance art or something.
Cash is passionate. He doesn’t suffer from fever dreams and make shit up. Just differs in opinon.
 
Cash is passionate. He doesn’t suffer from fever dreams and make shit up. Just differs in opinon.
I don't think I've seen him ever post a single thing that wasn't a half baked falsehood argued in bad faith.
 
I don't think I've seen him ever post a single thing that wasn't a half baked falsehood argued in bad faith.
Times Magazine / NYT meh not much of a difference lol. My bad and fixed. That being said they’re both liberal rags that are constantly slanted and ignore actual facts.
 
You know Time Magazine and The New York Times aren't related at all right? Do you think the LA Times, the London Times, the New York Times, and Time Magazine are all the same thing? They aren't even owned by the same company. Do you thing the Washington Post owns Post-It Notes too?

I used to think you were just stupid, but I'm beginning to think this is performance art or something.

Beyond the screwing up of outlet names, the Time magazine person of the year cover is for a person, a group, an idea, or an object that "for better or for worse... has done the most to influence the events of the year", which obviously means it can have good or bad people on the cover.
 
Beyond the screwing up of outlet names, the Time magazine person of the year cover is for a person, a group, an idea, or an object that "for better or for worse... has done the most to influence the events of the year", which obviously means it can have good or bad people on the cover.
Raoul trying to spin the cover for his boy Adolf. No surprise you’d try to spin this being that he ran on a socialist ticket and you, well are a socialist.
 
Oh Raoul still on this after Obama’s birth paperwork was discovered to forensically have digital layers which it obviously shouldn’t have had.

Ladies and Gentleman...I present you with exhibit A: 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂
 
Times Magazine / NYT meh not much of a difference lol. My bad and fixed. That being said they’re both liberal rags that are constantly slanted and ignore actual facts.
Time is not the New Yorker or the Atlantic or something. Here's a classic Onion video on the topic:
 
  • Haha
Reactions: CashvilleCane1
Raoul trying to spin the cover for his boy Adolf. No surprise you’d try to spin this being that he ran on a socialist ticket and you, well are a socialist.

You're screwing up "socialist" yet again. Just because the NAZI party had the word socialist in it, doesn't mean they are socialist. Any vaguely educated person knows that they were a right wing party that were influenced by Italian fascism with an added dimension of racism thrown in.
 
You're screwing up "socialist" yet again. Just because the NAZI party had the word socialist in it, doesn't mean they are socialist. Any vaguely educated person knows that they were a right wing party that were influenced by Italian fascism with an added dimension of racism thrown in.
Here we go again with you liking to spin something to meet your definition. Seriously you should be medicated or something.
 
Here we go again with you liking to spin something to meet your definition. Seriously you should be medicated or something.

Why continue to publicly humiliate yourself on this issue when you clearly aren't remotely educated about it.
 
Only you would take a thread about adolf hitler and use it as an attack against me.

Only you could screw up Time Magazine with the NY Times, then double down on your own idiocy by attempting to suggest Hitler was a leftist, when all you had to do is do a quick wiki search.
 
Why continue to publicly humiliate yourself on this issue when you clearly aren't remotely educated about it.
Uneducated on what Raoul? The Times listed Adolf as their person of the year for 1938? That’s absolute fact. You’ve now come in and tried to muddy the waters with your lies and distraction. Are you a nazi sympathizer or something?
 
Uneducated on what Raoul? The Times listed Adolf as their person of the year for 1938? That’s absolute fact. You’ve now come in and tried to muddy the waters with your lies and distraction. Are you a nazi sympathizer or something?
 
Uneducated on what Raoul? The Times listed Adolf as their person of the year for 1938? That’s absolute fact. You’ve now come in and tried to muddy the waters with your lies and distraction. Are you a nazi sympathizer or something?


You posted a link for Time Magazine not the Times.

But since you did, if you knew anything about context, you would know that being the Time Person of the Year doesn't mean you're a good person. It means you're an influential person, many of who can be bad. Stalin was on two covers, so was Deng Xao Ping and other not so nice people.
 
You posted a link for Time Magazine not the Times.

But since you did, if you knew anything about context, you would know that being the Time Person of the Year doesn't mean you're a good person. It means you're an influential person, many of who can be bad. Stalin was on two covers, so was Deng Xao Ping and other not so nice people.
And you put that on your cover why? You’re just trying to spin your way out of being an douchebag.
 
And you put that on your cover why? You’re just trying to spin your way out of being an douchebag.

Are you incapable of understanding basic concepts ? The answer is literally in the first sentence of the page you linked to in the OP.
 
Are you incapable of understanding basic concepts ? The answer is literally in the first sentence of the page you linked to in the OP.
Do you think that would fly in current times? I think you’re the one missing the point all for the purpose of being an ass.
 
Times Magazine / NYT meh not much of a difference lol. My bad and fixed. That being said they’re both liberal rags that are constantly slanted and ignore actual facts.

NYT quotes WAPO, who quotes CNN, who quotes The Atlantic, who quotes Time who quotes MSNBC, who quotes NBC who quotes ABC, who quotes un named DNC sources. With that resume the NYT and its fact checkers should be viewed as 100% the gold standard of truth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CashvilleCane1
You posted a link for Time Magazine not the Times.

But since you did, if you knew anything about context, you would know that being the Time Person of the Year doesn't mean you're a good person. It means you're an influential person, many of who can be bad. Stalin was on two covers, so was Deng Xao Ping and other not so nice people.

As a conservative, I formally send Cashville to bed early with no milk and cookies (Kinda like the FISA judge did with the FBI agent that falsified evidence to a FISA judge). For your confusing which liberal fish wrap chose Hitler as its man of the year. Both rags still exist and both are less credible than ever.
Cashville consider yourself punished to the level that a FISA court punishes someone that lies to it? That must be pretty serious stuff?

And BTW, Time Magazine also had a story in 1633 suporting how the prevailing government, the Pope (I think it was Pope Joe I) at the time agreed that Galileo was guilty of misinformation about the Earth circling the Sun in contrast to the Pope's most trusted Scienist, Antonious Faucious.

BTW, I am a Catholic DAGO so I have WOKE rights to make fun of Italians and the Pope.
 
Last edited:
Do you think that would fly in current times? I think you’re the one missing the point all for the purpose of being an ass.

No I do not think it would fly in present times. But the 1930s and 1940s were obviously a very long time ago. They did thee same thing with Khomeini in the 70s IIRC. There would be an outcry if it happened today.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT