ADVERTISEMENT

Stockholm Syndrome over Mask Wearing.

Doctors, nurses, microbiologists, immunologists, epidemiologists and other researchers keep saying we should wear masks to prevent the spread of Covid, but all these people who barely passed science in HS keep saying we shouldn't. It's so hard to know who to believe anymore!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cat.5 Cane
Doctors, nurses, microbiologists, immunologists, epidemiologists and other researchers keep saying we should wear masks to prevent the spread of Covid, but all these people who barely passed science in HS keep saying we shouldn't. It's so hard to know who to believe anymore!


A big problem was we only got one point of view. Social media would censor plenty of virologist, doctors etc. if they provided a legitimate different viewpoint. Meanwhile any joker could throw on a lab coat and spew the democrat press viewpoint, and they were treated as credible.
 
Doctors, nurses, microbiologists, immunologists, epidemiologists and other researchers keep saying we should wear masks to prevent the spread of Covid, but all these people who barely passed science in HS keep saying we shouldn't. It's so hard to know who to believe anymore!
You have a bad habit of making sweeping generalizations without facts to back them up. Multiple infectious disease experts are saying there is no need to wear a mask. We have reached herd immunity.
 
You have a bad habit of making sweeping generalizations without facts to back them up. Multiple infectious disease experts are saying there is no need to wear a mask. We have reached herd immunity.
I was referring to an earlier period. I'm aware of the latest recommendations that mask wearing is no longer a necessity. And I don't have a bad habit of making generalizations without facts. I research almost everything before I post to keep from doing that!
 
Last edited:
I was referring to an earlier period. I'm aware of the latest recommendations that mask wearing is no longer a necessity. And I don't have a bad habit of making generalizations without facts. I research almost everything before I post to keep from doing that!
The UM football team is clearly the best team in the country!
Oh don't mind me, I was referring to an earlier period (2001).
 
  • Haha
Reactions: krvanness
I was referring to an earlier period. I'm aware of the latest recommendations that mask wearing is no longer a necessity. And I don't have a bad habit of making generalizations without facts. I research almost everything before I post to keep from doing that!
Do you? You said the preponderance of evidence points to the virus having a natural cause and most scientists believe that. That is preposterous. There isn't one shred of evidence pointing to the virus having a natural origin. Not one. If there was any evidence it came from a bat the Chinese would've presented it, and they haven't. The lab was known to be doing dangerous gain of function research and had a history of sloppy technique and multiple accidents. There are reports three workers were hospitalized and someone's wife may have died. There was no cell phone activity in the lab and roads were closed in the fall of 2019. The lab was apparently closed down. Many experts in the field feel the most likely cause was an accident which they did not admit. To say most scientists think it came from a bat is untrue and patently ridiculous.
 
Last edited:
Do you? You said the preponderance of evidence points to the virus having a natural cause and most scientists believe that. That is preposterous. There isn't one shred of evidence pointing to the virus having a natural origin. Not one. If there was any evidence it came from a bat the Chinese would've presented it, and they haven't. The lab was known to be doing dangerous gain of function research and had a history of sloppy technique and multiple accidents. There are reports three workers were hospitalized and someone's wife may have died. There was no cell phone activity in the lab and roads were closed in the fall of 2019. The lab was apparently closed down. Many experts in the field feel the most likely cause was an accident which they did not admit. To say most scientists think it came from a bat is untrue and patently ridiculous.
No.Shorecane this guy (and many like him) frequently do this. Because they were told that the virus could not have possibly come from Wuhan Lab during the time when Trump was saying he saw evidence and when he was President, they simply can not now fathom that the FAKE NEWS that fed the dog manure into them to begin with, have now come onboard to the more plausible truth to the story. We have seen this phenomenon time and time again including Russia, the Dossier, etc............Now that it's safe for FAKE NEWS MSM to tell a bit more truth the libs out there still want to stay with the BS they were fed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GLFSTRM and grbcane
Do you? You said the preponderance of evidence points to the virus having a natural cause and most scientists believe that. That is preposterous. There isn't one shred of evidence pointing to the virus having a natural origin. Not one. If there was any evidence it came from a bat the Chinese would've presented it, and they haven't. The lab was known to be doing dangerous gain of function research and had a history of sloppy technique and multiple accidents. There are reports three workers were hospitalized and someone's wife may have died. There was no cell phone activity in the lab and roads were closed in the fall of 2019. The lab was apparently closed down. Many experts in the field feel the most likely cause was an accident which they did not admit. To say most scientists think it came from a bat is untrue and patently ridiculous.
Scientific findings published in the journal of Nature Medicine, among others, stated the virus was the product of natural evolution. Dr. Francis Collins, the director of Natural Institutes of Health supported the study's findings writing in his blog, "This study leaves little room to refute a natural origin for Covid-19"! You said there wasn't one shred of evidence pointing to the virus having a natural origin. Obviously, that was total BS! I named my resources, now name yours. I'd like to see where you come up with this crap!
 
Last edited:
Scientific findings published in the journal of Nature Medicine, among others, stated the virus was the product of natural evolution. Dr. Francis Collins, the director of Natural Institutes of Health supported the study's findings writing in his blog, "This study leaves little room to refute a natural origin for Covid-19"! You said there wasn't one shred of evidence pointing to the virus having a natural origin. Obviously, that was total BS!

They tested every form of animal sold in the Wuhan market and couldn’t find a link. China still hasn’t produced patient zero, why is that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NO.SHORECANE
Do you? You said the preponderance of evidence points to the virus having a natural cause and most scientists believe that. That is preposterous. There isn't one shred of evidence pointing to the virus having a natural origin. Not one. If there was any evidence it came from a bat the Chinese would've presented it, and they haven't. The lab was known to be doing dangerous gain of function research and had a history of sloppy technique and multiple accidents. There are reports three workers were hospitalized and someone's wife may have died. There was no cell phone activity in the lab and roads were closed in the fall of 2019. The lab was apparently closed down. Many experts in the field feel the most likely cause was an accident which they did not admit. To say most scientists think it came from a bat is untrue and patently ridiculous.
They tested every form of animal sold in the Wuhan market and couldn’t find a link. China still hasn’t produced patient zero, why is that?
A 55 year-old man and a young woman, Huang Yanling, have both been mentioned as patient zero. Who knows? We'll never get the truth from the Chinese. I put my faith in the medical and scientific community.
 
Last edited:
A 55 year-old man and a young woman, Huang Yanling, have both been mentioned as patient zero. Who knows? We'll never get the truth from the Chinese. I put my faith in the medical and scientific community.
I don’t believe that’s true, I used to put my faith there too until both became political, and one side was censored. Any scientist or doctor that had a different view from the democrat press or social media, was erased or a accused of spreading misinformation.
 
I don’t believe that’s true, I used to put my faith there too until both became political, and one side was censored. Any scientist or doctor that had a different view from the democrat press or social media, was erased or a accused of spreading misinformation.
Which we've seen over and over and over since this sham began in March of last year...
 
  • Like
Reactions: grbcane
I don’t believe that’s true, I used to put my faith there too until both became political, and one side was censored. Any scientist or doctor that had a different view from the democrat press or social media, was erased or a accused of spreading misinformation.
You don't believe in the medical or scientific community, the "democrat press" or social media but you believe in a life-long pathological liar. Does that even make sense to you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: CANE1983
No point in debating with an uninformed person whose mind is closed. When he said " life long pathologic liar" was he referring to Fauci?
 
Poor Mike, you’ll never get over your case of TDS.
I'll get over it when the Grand Jury hits him with criminal charges! I always thought that you were one of the more sane Trumpers but you're headed over a cliff with the rest of the lemmings!
 
Last edited:
I don’t believe that’s true, I used to put my faith there too until both became political, and one side was censored. Any scientist or doctor that had a different view from the democrat press or social media, was erased or a accused of spreading misinformation.
My dog is bigger than your dog has become my scientist is smarter than your scientist. LOL
 
No point in debating with an uninformed person whose mind is closed. When he said " life long pathologic liar" was he referring to Fauci?
What is your attraction to Trump? The lying, boasting or name-calling. The only thing I've been able to discern is that his supporter are attracted to his racist rhetoric. Is that the case with you?
 
What is your attraction to Trump? The lying, boasting or name-calling. The only thing I've been able to discern is that his supporter are attracted to his racist rhetoric. Is that the case with you?
You really are a lame uninformed pretentious asshole.I don't even like Trump ,as if that matters in a discussion about where the virus came from. It must suck to be you.
 
You really are a lame uninformed pretentious asshole.I don't even like Trump ,as if that matters in a discussion about where the virus came from. It must suck to be you.
I assumed you were a Trumper because you always side with them and have the same smart-ass attitude. You stated "there is not one shred of evidence pointing to the virus having a natural origin". I provided with quotes from scientific experts who stated the opposite. I named my sources and asked you to do the same. Still waiting!
 
I assumed you were a Trumper because you always side with them and have the same smart-ass attitude. You stated "there is not one shred of evidence pointing to the virus having a natural origin". I provided with quotes from scientific experts who stated the opposite. I named my sources and asked you to do the same. Still waiting!
So, people who support facts and science are Trump supporters, according to you? Interesting
 
I assumed you were a Trumper because you always side with them and have the same smart-ass attitude. You stated "there is not one shred of evidence pointing to the virus having a natural origin". I provided with quotes from scientific experts who stated the opposite. I named my sources and asked you to do the same. Still waiting!
You can't be serious. You call that scientific evidence? The Journal of Nature Medicine.? Collins is a political hack like Fauci. They gave money to the lab for dangerous gain of function research. Do you really think they want to be implicated as being a part of the cause. of the pandemic? They just found an email from the sleazebag head of Echo, the third party that directed the money to the lab, thanking Fauci for downplaying the possibility that it came from the lab. Collins and Fauci are part of the problem not the solution. Don't you think if there. was any evidence it came from a bat China would have already produced it , but there isn't any.
Collins bumbled his way through an interview yesterday and wouldn't give a straight answer on anything.He is a fraud just like Fauci. They are trying to cover up what happened, because they were part of it.
 
Last edited:
In January 2020 Dr. Christian Anderson of. the Scripps Institute, one of the most prestigious scientific organizations in the world sent Fauci an email warning him that there were worrisome aspects of the virus that looked MANUFACTURED ,and they were concerned-FACT. Fauci apparently ignored this and didn't share it with the Covid Task Force. He must be forced to explain this egregious dereliction of duty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: grbcane
You can't be serious. You call that scientific evidence? The Journal of Nature Medicine.? Collins is a political hack like Fauci. They gave money to the lab for dangerous gain of function research. Do you really think they want to be implicated as being a part of the cause. of the pandemic? They just found an email from the sleazebag head of Echo, the third party that directed the money to the lab, thanking Fauci for downplaying the possibility that it came from the lab. Collins and Fauci are part of the problem not the solution. Don't you think if there. was any evidence it came from a bat China would have already produced it , but there isn't any.
Collins bumbled his way through an interview yesterday and wouldn't give a straight answer on anything.He is a fraud just like Fauci. They are trying to cover up what happened, because they were part of it.
The evidence that the virus was man-made does seem to be gaining more prevalence. The Chinese will never admit to any culpability so it will be difficult to positively prove one way or the other. However unlikely, there is still the possibility that it was a natural occurrence.
 
Last edited:
The 90 day investigation is a joke. There is no new evidence .In April 2020 Trump said he had seen hard evidence it came from the lab , and everyone mocked him.There will be no smoking gun, because they destroyed all the evidence. Our government knows what happened, but they aren't going to admit it it. There will be a whitewash and a vague statement that we realLy don't know what happened. There will be no mention that we gave the lab 600K and Fauci denied it and then admitted it.
 
The 90 day investigation is a joke. There is no new evidence .In April 2020 Trump said he had seen hard evidence it came from the lab , and everyone mocked him.There will be no smoking gun, because they destroyed all the evidence. Our government knows what happened, but they aren't going to admit it it. There will be a whitewash and a vague statement that we realLy don't know what happened. There will be no mention that we gave the lab 600K and Fauci denied it and then admitted it.
Very well stated...
 
Scientific findings published in the journal of Nature Medicine, among others, stated the virus was the product of natural evolution. Dr. Francis Collins, the director of Natural Institutes of Health supported the study's findings writing in his blog, "This study leaves little room to refute a natural origin for Covid-19"! You said there wasn't one shred of evidence pointing to the virus having a natural origin. Obviously, that was total BS! I named my resources, now name yours. I'd like to see where you come up with this crap!
Your idol Collins is a bumbling fool reminiscent of Biden. The walls are closing in on him and Fauci, and he is desperately trying to back away from his ridiculous position that the virus came from a bat. It will be interesting to see how he explains how he gave. 600K of taxpayer money to a lab known for doing dangerous sloppy research run by a general in the PLA, our most dangerous enemy. There are reports that they are getting ready to get rid of him, as he is now a political liability.
 
  • Like
Reactions: grbcane
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT