I have a question for you guys. I’ve seen on this board people upset about mlb decision to pull the all star game due to their objection to the voting rights laws in Ga. I’ve heard some folks say “you need voter ID because how else do they know it’s you?” And justifying the passage of these laws.
my question is if these laws are being enacted to curb our right to vote after an election that according to minority leader in the senate Mitch McConnell wasnt fraudulent and lacked evidence, why is it ok to try to limit someone’s right to vote and be ok laws that are going to make it harder to vote? This is allegedly because we don’t want even the potential of fraud yet your not ok for any additional restrictions on guns bc it may violate someones constitutional right to bear arms.
is one constitutional right greater than the other?
my question is if these laws are being enacted to curb our right to vote after an election that according to minority leader in the senate Mitch McConnell wasnt fraudulent and lacked evidence, why is it ok to try to limit someone’s right to vote and be ok laws that are going to make it harder to vote? This is allegedly because we don’t want even the potential of fraud yet your not ok for any additional restrictions on guns bc it may violate someones constitutional right to bear arms.
is one constitutional right greater than the other?