That's a really cynical point of view. Journalist adhere to the canons of journalism. Sure they write from their perspective but there are ethical constraints they are required to adhere to. The problem comes when opinionists feign as journalists. Look at Tucker, for instance, he was sued and his defense literally was that he is not a journalist, meaning he is an opinionist and you can't hold him to account because it need not meet journalism standards. Fair argument. The problem is most folks that enjoy him don't draw the line between him and Rachel Maddow. They treat it as whatboutism and equate the two. Maddow is a flaming lib, sure, but she runs a show that is actual journalism, she can be sued if she intentionally misstates and she can't rely on the Tucker defense.
Fox has some of the finest journalists in the game but they are moving from that model to pure opinion not even editorial, just opinion. Fringe outlets don't even bother with that.
Journalism programs/schools at university and college levels are not new. The conflation of journalism and opinion is. William F. Buckley and James Baldwin were heroes, neither was a journalist, they were commentators. Now, folks can't accept that George Will, Neil Cavuto, or Peggy Noonan because they don't agree with their conservativism...crazy thing is that's equal for the far right and left.
Journalism isn't shit tho, Its journalism, some damn fines ones out there. Wallace, Baer, Stahl, and Cooper come to mind immediately.