I don't want to read too much into this:
"The defense had only one sack with six tackles for losses.
“They give the scheme and we follow it,” Garvin said. “Yeah you always want to put pressure on them, but we had different goals we can’t sit here and explain - we know on the inside.”"
But I can't help but sense some frustration on Garvin's part. We know the plan called for one of the DL to hold back and spy Franks to contain him. Sounds like Garvin would have rather let the dogs loose more. He is not the coach, and as he says they follow the plan. But it seems he wasn't thrilled with the plan. In retrospect, I wonder if the D staff would have done anything differently. Seems like the real problem was mostly tackling on a couple of key plays.
"The defense had only one sack with six tackles for losses.
“They give the scheme and we follow it,” Garvin said. “Yeah you always want to put pressure on them, but we had different goals we can’t sit here and explain - we know on the inside.”"
But I can't help but sense some frustration on Garvin's part. We know the plan called for one of the DL to hold back and spy Franks to contain him. Sounds like Garvin would have rather let the dogs loose more. He is not the coach, and as he says they follow the plan. But it seems he wasn't thrilled with the plan. In retrospect, I wonder if the D staff would have done anything differently. Seems like the real problem was mostly tackling on a couple of key plays.
