Maybe this has been touched upon in other threads, but for those who haven't flipped through all the pages and posts, can you share how much of this you agree with?
From the the view of the influence-makers (BOT, big money donors, individuals who can cause major changes in the program), they want Mario and are prepared to do whatever it takes to make this happen. Obviously, this means removing Manny, and the new AD should be on board with this.
If we can't get Mario, or if it's not a sure thing, then there is still a considerable (maybe universal?) view to removing Manny, but this is where it gets complicated. The uncertainty of who we're likely to get, combined with the new AD and how much say he'll have. There might even be a minority of people who are risk-averse and are saying, if we can't get Mario, why risk leaving this to a national search, let's keep Manny for another year?
I guess what I'm asking is -- if we can't get Mario, and we know that, then how likely is it that Manny is gone? Are these two even related?
From the the view of the influence-makers (BOT, big money donors, individuals who can cause major changes in the program), they want Mario and are prepared to do whatever it takes to make this happen. Obviously, this means removing Manny, and the new AD should be on board with this.
If we can't get Mario, or if it's not a sure thing, then there is still a considerable (maybe universal?) view to removing Manny, but this is where it gets complicated. The uncertainty of who we're likely to get, combined with the new AD and how much say he'll have. There might even be a minority of people who are risk-averse and are saying, if we can't get Mario, why risk leaving this to a national search, let's keep Manny for another year?
I guess what I'm asking is -- if we can't get Mario, and we know that, then how likely is it that Manny is gone? Are these two even related?
