I know it's important the way in which wins and losses come about. But, in the absence of any blowouts, are these results satisfactory to keep the Golden regime?
Bethune-Cookman W
Florida Atlantic W
Nebraska L
Cincinnati L
Florida State L
Virginia Tech W
Clemson * W
Duke W
Virginia W
North Carolina W
Georgia Tech W
Pittsburgh W
That's 9-3, and most likely a Coastal championship. Now, if you are on the fence add:
ACCCG Clemson L
Bowl Game L
If you don't think we can go on a long winning streak only to fall apart, look back 2 years. I am just curious to see how people think and was trying to pose a difficult situation. I believe the administration would keep Golden with this outcome. This is the scenario that makes me uneasy. I would still make a change. Now, make that Clemson win into a loss and it's a no brainer. I think we are realistically looking at 9-3/8-4 and that's not good enough, imo.
Bethune-Cookman W
Florida Atlantic W
Nebraska L
Cincinnati L
Florida State L
Virginia Tech W
Clemson * W
Duke W
Virginia W
North Carolina W
Georgia Tech W
Pittsburgh W
That's 9-3, and most likely a Coastal championship. Now, if you are on the fence add:
ACCCG Clemson L
Bowl Game L
If you don't think we can go on a long winning streak only to fall apart, look back 2 years. I am just curious to see how people think and was trying to pose a difficult situation. I believe the administration would keep Golden with this outcome. This is the scenario that makes me uneasy. I would still make a change. Now, make that Clemson win into a loss and it's a no brainer. I think we are realistically looking at 9-3/8-4 and that's not good enough, imo.
