I think this will drag on for the next 7 years
He won't last that long. Unless the Russian army marches into Washington he certainly won't be reelected.I think this will drag on for the next 7 years
4 Americans lost their life but let us carry on with our fake outrage.
Were you just as outraged over Trumps order of his botched Yemen attack over his well done steak? Casualties are just a part of their trade. Hillary asked a Republican led Congress for more funds for security. Want to know their answer? Will you be outraged to hear they said no?
Sure as hell would be but that’s not what happened. Jesus do you guys just make up sh#t on a whim? I’ve never seen such a Bunch manipulators and liars in my life.
Here is your problem. You think i am stupid but i am as sharp as they come. Do you seriously think posting some conservatives viewpoint as fact proves crap to me? They spent how many years wasting taxpayer dollars on lies to the American people? Get yourself a bi partisan source...this ain't it...and this is the problem generally. Refusal to listen to anyone that doesn't believe what you do. That's what America is all about.
Never said you’re stupid but you’re not beyond posting whatever you heard as fact and then taking it to the grave. What I posted was directly from congressional hearing testimony. It’s not a talking point. Get over yourself!
For your reading pleasure and directly from the state departments mouth stating what Biden said wasn’t true or relevant:
On a side note the reason why the state department wouldn’t approve more security request because they were illegally running weapons to Syria and arming Al-Qaeda terrorist to overthrow the Syrian leadership. By the way did you ever notice every country overthrown was Shia majority? Hmmmm makes you wonder doesn’t it. Being that Obama’s cabinet had several members of the Muslim Brotherhood in it who are all... Sunni! I don’t believe in coincidences. Arab spring my ass!
The funny thing is I am not going to kill them for the reason why. I am killing them for the hypocrisy. If they were so concerned about these lives they would have approved the security request is my only point. Meaning, don't cost our tax payers billions politicizing this.
I don’t disagree with the politicizing part but they royally f#cked up! Heads needed to roll for this because of all that was happening behind the scenes. You think there would’ve been any less noise from the left had this happened under Trump? Could you imagine the response? By the way I don’t blame Obama for this. I very much put this squarely on the shoulders of Hillary. The post attack narrative was an embarrassment and outside of the that... the “what difference does it make” comment was like pissing in the face of every patriotic American.
For your reading pleasure and directly from the state departments mouth stating what Biden said wasn’t true or relevant:
“
CHARLIE NEIBERGALL / AP PHOTO
The post-debate fact checkers are taking Vice President Joe Biden to task for saying the administration never received requests for more diplomatic security in Libya. when in fact the State Department has already admitted it rejected those very requests. But more nuanced was Biden’s suggestion, albeit oblique, that funding cuts were somehow related to the relative lack of security in Benghazi leading up to the Sept. 11 attacks there.
“The congressman here cut embassy security in his budget by $300 million below what we asked for,” said Biden in Thursday night’s debate, referencing Paul Ryan’s budget plan. “So much for the embassy security piece.”
But would more money have prevented the attacks?
Apparently not, at least according to one senior State Department official who would certainly seem to know.
In testimony Wednesday before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Charlene Lamb, a deputy assistant secretary of state for diplomatic security, was asked, “Was there any budget consideration and lack of budget which led you not to increase the number of people in the security force there?”
Lamb responded, “No, sir.”
Recall that Lamb is the person who denied requests from the top diplomatic security officer in Libya to retain a 16-man team of military personnel who had been protecting diplomats.
That would seem to be the end of the story.
So where did Biden come up with this line? Unclear. But what is known is that one of the first mentions of budget cuts in relation to Benghazi appears to have came from Rep. Elijah Cummings, the Democratic ranking member on the House Oversight Committee. In a press release before Wednesday’s hearing, Cummings wrote, “The fact is that, since 2011, the House has cut embassy security by hundreds of millions of dollars below the amounts requested by the President. Restoring our commitment to embassy security would make a real difference to thousands of Americans who serve our country overseas, often in extremely dangerous circumstances.”
Whether doing so will prevent another Benghazi is another story.
Same goes for a point Ryan made a few seconds earlier, in which he asked why the U.S. ambassador in France was protected by Marine guards, yet Ambassador Chris Stevens, arguably positioned in a far more dangerous country, was not. “Our ambassador in Paris has a marine detachment guarding him. Should we have a marine detachment in Benghazi?” Ryan asked.
Biden didn’t answer the question directly, responding instead with his people-who-live-in-glass-houses line about embassy security budget cuts. But Ryan’s assertion is also flawed. Marines are charged with protecting a diplomatic mission’s classified documents, not its personnel. The obligation to protect the mission itself falls to the host country, a job Libya may have failed to do.
Fake? So Americans being dragged thru streets and getting killed is fake?? Sickening comment!! You’ve made this commment before regarding Benghazi, you really are a sick sick person!! You cry about the “innocent lives” taken by police yet call it “fake outrage” when Americans doing a service overseas “fake outrage”??
Hahahahaha classic CD “you think I am stupid but I am as sharp as they come” hilarious!!! Yeah you are the one who should lecture about a bi partisan viewpoint! Makes sense, as we all know how “sharp” and biased you are! Sure
Cane919, seriously he hasn’t put you on ignore yet?? Wow! You really are using to many facts with CD and Cems! They get confused with the truth!
And I thought you were a competent lawyer. Now I know better. You should know a person not subject to criminal investigation can become the target in a hot minute. You ever thought Trump not being named the target was a setup to get him to testify? There are 3 stages a person can be subject to. First as a witness. Next step is a subject of interest. The last the target. Next step for Trump is The Target!!
That's because you don't know the law as usual.
Narrative? It's the truth. Something right wingers know nothing about. Happy client hunting. Lol
Hahahahaha yeah you are a great legal scholar I’m sure!! Go back under that rock!
Yeah Right wingers were celebrating Trump was said not to be a target like a klansman running over a civil rights protester in an 18 wheeler. They have no idea what is gonna hit them....it's sad.
Can't do that as long as we have ignorant posters on Canesport. Not saying you're ignorant. Lol
