For about six months now since the November 2016 Election, liberals have gone to hell in a hand basket whining, bitching, and crying about how Trump ALLEGEDLY colluded with Russia to influence the outcome of the 2016 Election.
Liberals have consistently fallen into the same flawed pitfalls, like clockwork, on this issue.
I ask for COLD HARD FACTS which prove collusion between Trump and Russia. What do Liberals give me? Hypothetical arguments, unsubstantiated speculation, and fake news from flaming far left liberal websites like BuzzFeed, The Huffington Post, and The Heavy. All that isn't PROOF- it is merely innuendo, theory, and self-serving rhetoric designed to satisfy you liberals' hate filled hunger toward Trump like heroin to a street junkie.
And the reason that you liberals cannot come up with COLD HARD FACTS which prove collusion between Trump and Russia, is because NONE EXIST at THIS POINT IN TIME, because BOTH the FBI and the Senate/House Intel Committees are still in the FACT FINDING stage. The FBI has more than 150 Agents researching, investigating, and reviewing countless information, and the Senate/House Intel Committees are working in a BI-PARTISAN manner to interview dozens, if not hundreds of witness called upon to testify before Congress on the "Russian issue". The "Russian issue" is INCONCLUSIVE at THIS POINT IN TIME, so you liberals acting like you have more information than either the FBI or the House/Senate Intel Committees and are able to draw a definitive conclusion on Trump is the textbook definition of liberal circle jerk douchebaggery.
See, in this country, we obtain cold hard facts through fact finding before we draw a definitive conclusion- something you liberals still can't through your thick skulls. What you iberals love to do, is play mental midget games by impeaching, convicting, and hanging Trump on NOTHING but either INNUENDO, THEORY, or SELF-SERVING RHETORIC before there is an official report on exactly what happened. And then when you liberals are called out for your bullshit, you go to your next amateur trick, which is to play the race card, and call Trump supporters racists, xenophobes, homophobes blah blah blah... Flavor tag of the week...
So, you liberals are a two trick dog and pony show. First trick is the dog, whereby you fraudulently claim the moral high ground by impeaching, convicting, and hanging Trump on nothing but either innuendo, theory, or self-serving rhetoric based on hypothetical arguments, unsubstantiated speculation, and fake news. Then we call you out on that bullshit mental midget tactic. Second trick is the pony, whereby you play the race card and falsely accuse his supporters of being racists.
So, by all means liberals, keep wallowing in your own circle jerk cesspool of conspiracy theories, hypothetical arguments, and unsubstantiated speculation.
In the MEANTIME though, you may want to digest some of the criticism of Obama and how that piece of shit for a president was softer, closer, and weaker with Russia.
President Obama found his private moment of political candor caught by a live microphone on Monday as he told President Dmitri A. Medvedev of Russia that he would have “more flexibility” to negotiate on the delicate issue of missile defense after the November election, which Mr. Obama apparently feels confident he will win. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/27/u...crophone-telling-medvedev-of-flexibility.html
Obama’s response to Russia’s invasion of Crimea in March 2014, and Moscow’s subsequent support of pro-Russian rebels in eastern Ukraine was economic sanctions. Although the measures had an impact on the Russian economy, they were seen as woefully inadequate by some Republican lawmakers in Congress. https://www.theatlantic.com/news/archive/2017/02/trump-obama-russia-crimea/516777/
President Obama's failure to match his actions to his tough rhetoric may have given Russia the impression that it could interfere with the U.S. electoral system without consequence, former Defense Secretary Robert Gates suggested Sunday. Gates was asked during a Sunday appearance on NBC's "Meet the Press" whether Russian President Vladimir Putin may have pursued hack-and-release operations against the U.S. because he perceived Obama had become "soft" on Moscow and wouldn't retaliate if Putin were caught. "I think that Putin saw the United States withdrawing from around the world. I think, actually, the problem has been that President Obama's actions often have not matched his rhetoric," Gates told Chuck Todd. "His rhetoric has often been pretty tough," the former CIA director said of Obama. "But then there's been no follow-up and no action. And if you combine that with red lines that have been crossed, demands that [Syrian President Bashar] Assad step down with no plan to actually figure out how to make that happen, the withdrawal from the Middle East, from Iraq and Afghanistan and essentially the way it was done, I think it sent a signal that the U.S. was in retreat." http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/g...age-of-obamas-weak-leadership/article/2609940
Liberals have consistently fallen into the same flawed pitfalls, like clockwork, on this issue.
I ask for COLD HARD FACTS which prove collusion between Trump and Russia. What do Liberals give me? Hypothetical arguments, unsubstantiated speculation, and fake news from flaming far left liberal websites like BuzzFeed, The Huffington Post, and The Heavy. All that isn't PROOF- it is merely innuendo, theory, and self-serving rhetoric designed to satisfy you liberals' hate filled hunger toward Trump like heroin to a street junkie.
And the reason that you liberals cannot come up with COLD HARD FACTS which prove collusion between Trump and Russia, is because NONE EXIST at THIS POINT IN TIME, because BOTH the FBI and the Senate/House Intel Committees are still in the FACT FINDING stage. The FBI has more than 150 Agents researching, investigating, and reviewing countless information, and the Senate/House Intel Committees are working in a BI-PARTISAN manner to interview dozens, if not hundreds of witness called upon to testify before Congress on the "Russian issue". The "Russian issue" is INCONCLUSIVE at THIS POINT IN TIME, so you liberals acting like you have more information than either the FBI or the House/Senate Intel Committees and are able to draw a definitive conclusion on Trump is the textbook definition of liberal circle jerk douchebaggery.
See, in this country, we obtain cold hard facts through fact finding before we draw a definitive conclusion- something you liberals still can't through your thick skulls. What you iberals love to do, is play mental midget games by impeaching, convicting, and hanging Trump on NOTHING but either INNUENDO, THEORY, or SELF-SERVING RHETORIC before there is an official report on exactly what happened. And then when you liberals are called out for your bullshit, you go to your next amateur trick, which is to play the race card, and call Trump supporters racists, xenophobes, homophobes blah blah blah... Flavor tag of the week...
So, you liberals are a two trick dog and pony show. First trick is the dog, whereby you fraudulently claim the moral high ground by impeaching, convicting, and hanging Trump on nothing but either innuendo, theory, or self-serving rhetoric based on hypothetical arguments, unsubstantiated speculation, and fake news. Then we call you out on that bullshit mental midget tactic. Second trick is the pony, whereby you play the race card and falsely accuse his supporters of being racists.
So, by all means liberals, keep wallowing in your own circle jerk cesspool of conspiracy theories, hypothetical arguments, and unsubstantiated speculation.
In the MEANTIME though, you may want to digest some of the criticism of Obama and how that piece of shit for a president was softer, closer, and weaker with Russia.
President Obama found his private moment of political candor caught by a live microphone on Monday as he told President Dmitri A. Medvedev of Russia that he would have “more flexibility” to negotiate on the delicate issue of missile defense after the November election, which Mr. Obama apparently feels confident he will win. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/27/u...crophone-telling-medvedev-of-flexibility.html
Obama’s response to Russia’s invasion of Crimea in March 2014, and Moscow’s subsequent support of pro-Russian rebels in eastern Ukraine was economic sanctions. Although the measures had an impact on the Russian economy, they were seen as woefully inadequate by some Republican lawmakers in Congress. https://www.theatlantic.com/news/archive/2017/02/trump-obama-russia-crimea/516777/
President Obama's failure to match his actions to his tough rhetoric may have given Russia the impression that it could interfere with the U.S. electoral system without consequence, former Defense Secretary Robert Gates suggested Sunday. Gates was asked during a Sunday appearance on NBC's "Meet the Press" whether Russian President Vladimir Putin may have pursued hack-and-release operations against the U.S. because he perceived Obama had become "soft" on Moscow and wouldn't retaliate if Putin were caught. "I think that Putin saw the United States withdrawing from around the world. I think, actually, the problem has been that President Obama's actions often have not matched his rhetoric," Gates told Chuck Todd. "His rhetoric has often been pretty tough," the former CIA director said of Obama. "But then there's been no follow-up and no action. And if you combine that with red lines that have been crossed, demands that [Syrian President Bashar] Assad step down with no plan to actually figure out how to make that happen, the withdrawal from the Middle East, from Iraq and Afghanistan and essentially the way it was done, I think it sent a signal that the U.S. was in retreat." http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/g...age-of-obamas-weak-leadership/article/2609940
Last edited:
