ADVERTISEMENT

The killing of Ahmaud Arbery

How can you claim self defense after shooting an unarmed man in the back who was horizontal to the ground?
Thats not what the evidence showed and lets talk about the EXCULPATORY drone video in High Def that the prosecution failed to turn over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6882 and grbcane
Cane Bandit, I had to laugh. As I read your post, CNN was on. They had some old white loser libbie lawyer on. He said that Rittenhouse had no right to defend himself with a gun from an attacker with a skateboard. He then said that "NO ONE HAS EVER DIED FROM BEING HIT BY A SKATEBOARD". He said that approximately 7:10 EST today 11-16-21 so the board clowns can hear it for themselves before they write that I am lying.
So to prove that CNN lies to its viewers, they can listen and then do what I did, google "killed by being hit with a skateboard". Many examples pop up, I will include the top one to illustrate:
https://abc7.com/starbucks-fight-santa-ana-man-dies-skateboard/1098183/

Maybe this is in the Antifa training manual? But the fact is that it is there for all to see; CNN's supposed expert lying to the CNN viewers. So what is more likely today? CD or Mikey doing quick and simple research to verify CNN's lie or yapping on about the DNC lies that are being parroted?.
He had no business going there in the first place...PERIOD!
 
He had no business going there in the first place...PERIOD!
That's not your call. Last I checked this is America. I remember a time where Black Americans were not permitted or encouraged to "go there." You remember those dark days CD?

Also I'm just curious little white boy Rosenbaum the sexual predator of little boys was at a BLM riot but the testimony is that he was screaming the word ******. Now why would he be screaming that word at a BLM riot when he was team BLM? Things that make you scratch your head. The N word.
 
Yes, watch it all. When he gets off, you’ll understand why.
He won't get off. He may skate the murder charge but will face some degree of punishment. You can't shoot an unarmed man in the back and not face repercussions.
 
Last edited:
He won't get off. He may skate the murder charge but will face some degree of punishment. You can't shoot an unarmed man in the back and not face repercussions.
That's just it. Too many of these people feel entitled. They think they can do whatever they want. It's sad. Too bad the camera phone was invented. That interupted their good time. Now they have to be A C C O U N T A B L E!
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawaiian cane
That's just it. Too many of these people feel entitled. They think they can do whatever they want. It's sad. Too bad the camera phone was invented. That interupted their good time. Now they have to be A C C O U N T A B L E!
You must be referring to those thinking they could just burn down cities and peoples livelihoods, people that didn’t even live there, and think business owners would not defend their livelihoods. I guess two of those thugs were wrong.
 
wasn't the kid laying on the ground and being attacked when he shot? if so he gets off on murder charge.

if people were dumb enough to attack someone holding an AR then it is what it is.

i know i'm not gonna try to attack someone holding an AR in plain site.
You're referring to an earlier shooting. How could he shoot someone in the back if he was laying on the ground? He was standing and the man he shot in the back was horizontal to the ground.
 
Last edited:
What was he doing before he was unarmed and laying Horizontal?
I'm not defending the AHole. He was shouting at people and acting belligerent. What I question is the plausibility of claiming self defense after shooting an unarmed man in the back. The kill shot was the one to the back. To be shot in the back he had to be horizontal to the ground and no longer an immediate threat. I don't think self defense holds up in that situation and why the jury hasn't returned with a quick acquittal.
 
Last edited:
I'm not defending the AHole. He was shouting at people and acting belligerent. What I question is the plausibility of claiming self defense after shooting an unarmed man in the back. The kill shot was the one to the back. To be shot in the back he had to be horizontal to the ground and no longer an immediate threat. I don't think self defense holds up in that situation and why the jury hasn't returned with a quick acquittal.
That’s your opinion. If the kill shot immediately followed the first bullet that put him to the ground, it is what it is. When you are being attacked shot happens. Self defense is self defense.
 
Last edited:
I am pretty sure you people have no idea of what self defense is. Just because someone is belligerent that isn't self defense. You go to a riot where there is looting I would think you would expect to find people that are belligerent no? It's a riot where there is looting and dangerous people....so that's why you loaded up a weapon to confront them. That isn't self defense. You initiated the confrontation by going there in the first place and deputizing yourself.

What you people have to understand is this isn't a police officer going to a crime scene. This is an underaged POS going there to dole out his version of cowboy justice. He is not any different than anyone else that that riot if you ask me. Every single person there is accountable for being there. He is no exception to the rule.
 
I am pretty sure you people have no idea of what self defense is. Just because someone is belligerent that isn't self defense. You go to a riot where there is looting I would think you would expect to find people that are belligerent no? It's a riot where there is looting and dangerous people....so that's why you loaded up a weapon to confront them. That isn't self defense. You initiated the confrontation by going there in the first place and deputizing yourself.

What you people have to understand is this isn't a police officer going to a crime scene. This is an underaged POS going there to dole out his version of cowboy justice. He is not any different than anyone else that that riot if you ask me. Every single person there is accountable for being there. He is no exception to the rule.
Thanks, Joy Lemon. Sheep!
 
That’s your opinion. If the kill shot immediately followed the first bullet that put him to the ground, it is what it is. When you are being attacked shot happens. Self defense is self defense.
I predict a hung jury and mistrial declared because some won't agree with the self defense claim. If that occurs, Rittenhouse walks. The longer the jury stays out, the more likely this is the case.
 
Last edited:
I am pretty sure you people have no idea of what self defense is. Just because someone is belligerent that isn't self defense. You go to a riot where there is looting I would think you would expect to find people that are belligerent no? It's a riot where there is looting and dangerous people....so that's why you loaded up a weapon to confront them. That isn't self defense. You initiated the confrontation by going there in the first place and deputizing yourself.

What you people have to understand is this isn't a police officer going to a crime scene. This is an underaged POS going there to dole out his version of cowboy justice. He is not any different than anyone else that that riot if you ask me. Every single person there is accountable for being there. He is no exception to the rule.
Lets dispense of the fake news by CD and the liberal mokes on here.
He din't carry an illegal weapon over state lines
His father, Uncle and other family members live in Kenosha
He went there to clean graffiti off the school building that looting and rioting animals did
He was THEN ASKED to help defend and guard a couple of used car lots with a group of guys
In each and EVERY case he was running away and being chased by all 3 guys he shot
 
Lets dispense of the fake news by CD and the liberal mokes on here.
He din't carry an illegal weapon over state lines
His father, Uncle and other family members live in Kenosha
He went there to clean graffiti off the school building that looting and rioting animals did
He was THEN ASKED to help defend and guard a couple of used car lots with a group of guys
In each and EVERY case he was running away and being chased by all 3 guys he shot
Yep. And those guys were all armed with something
 
Yep. And those guys were all armed with something
Another one of the rabid animals that attacked Kyle Rittenhouse has been uncovered. He is the one that peacefully kicked Rittenhouse in the head. He supposedly offered to testify against Rittenhouse but even the prosecution realized how toxic he was. They may have broken another rule of evidence by not informing the defense of his identity.

The article below provides a good synopsis of "Jump Kick Man" as well as the two dead and one wounded. There is an old saying that you can judge a person's character by the company they keep. What does that say for people that support these career felons as heroes?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...d-kicking-Kyle-Rittenhouse-head-revealed.html
 
Another one of the rabid animals that attacked Kyle Rittenhouse has been uncovered. He is the one that peacefully kicked Rittenhouse in the head. He supposedly offered to testify against Rittenhouse but even the prosecution realized how toxic he was. They may have broken another rule of evidence by not informing the defense of his identity.

The article below provides a good synopsis of "Jump Kick Man" as well as the two dead and one wounded. There is an old saying that you can judge a person's character by the company they keep. What does that say for people that support these career felons as heroes?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...d-kicking-Kyle-Rittenhouse-head-revealed.html
This is over. Mistrial with prejudice. This is what happens when our in trial and convicted by the dishonest media.
 
  • Like
Reactions: orly 1022
just as i thought. you try to attack someone holding an AR you get what's coming to ya.

it's sad those people are dead, but the kid was within his rights and the jury agreed.

the law says you can open carry then you don't attack someone doing that.

the child rapist got what was coming.
 
This one hits much closer to home. It happened here in GA. I supposed these chipped toothed hyenas who had the DA cover this up will be protected here too. It's sad what is going on in this country when a man can't even go for a run without getting killed. The dude was just running....and again these COWBOY JUSTICE HYENAS think it is their civic duty to pretend they have been deputized somehow. Then take hyena justice into their own hands. This is why I am anti gun. Not the people protecting themselves....it is the hyenas that believe it is their job to self deputize and start murdering minorities for jogging or going to the store to buy tea or whatever.

Some of you cats are so full of shit. You don't load a weapon underaged and go to where there is looting and rioting to kill people and call it self defense. That's not self defense. You put yourself at the scene looking for trouble. You just found what you were looking for.....and then this hyena has the nerve to go bragging about it with alt right racist. No one but, you and the racist world buy that self defense garbage. I don't.

Like I said. FULL OF SHIT!!! You think it matters who was there? That I care if it was BLM or Antifa? I don't care. It wasn't his place to bring a loaded weapon to a riot. You don't allow? He is not the police. It's NOT SELF DEFENSE! He had no business going there. Your explanation here is horse crap. I don't care who it is. BLM or Antifa either. If they murdered someone there they should rot in jail too. He doesn't get to go and kill anyone anywhere without the authority to do so....So I have no idea what this Bull Jive argument even means!

No, it is not a case he clearly defended himself because he put himself at the scene of danger....with intent to use a loaded weapon. That is NOT SELF DEFENSE.

Does that really matter? Why would it matter where you are from? I don't know why a person had a hand gun but should remind you that isn't necessarily illegal to own a fire arm in the United States if you are of age right? Charged with what exactly? Are you for second amendment rights or not? What is it that he should be charged for? Now I have some questions?

Can it really be self defense when you are killing unarmed people? Can it really be self defense if you are someone that crossed state lines to do so?

His dad living there does not give him a right to deputize himself. This is a nation of laws. He is an under aged person loading a weapon going over state lines. You don't get to do this just because your dad lives there. He killed unarmed people too. This is not self defense.

This is like saying Ahmaud Arbery can't go for a run without getting shot. So, this guy can go over state lines underaged with a loaded weapon to a riot because his dad lives there but Ahmaud can't even go for a run where he lives?

Listen to yourself. It's embarrassing. I don't even think you realize what you are doing at this point. "I wish Arbery had been armed"? Why? So these assholes can tell you it was self defense too? Don't you see what is going on? You are saying in one breath it is okay to load a weapon and go to a riot / looting scene and murder people that are unarmed claiming self defense. Then you want Arbery to have a weapon on him for what? So you can make it about self defense? This is sad what you are trying to defend. A underaged teenager 18 years old loading a weapon to go across state lines and killing people that aren't even armed and saying self defense. I can't see I blame Kyle for saying self defense. What else what he say? He's up for a lifetime prison sentence. Who wouldn't? People that defend it I have the problem with.

What I see is this agenda for everyone to have a gun so when someone shots someone else they can claim self defense much easier. Because they will just say that they had a gun. So, in this system you can do what you want unless you are a minority of course. Then it is time to say if the Minority had a gun let's go look at that persons criminal record. It's self defense....all while making the job of the Police at least ten times more difficult. So, nobody can truely tell the difference between a good guy with a gun and a bad guy with a gun. The NRA is ruining this country with this agenda people should be with a weapon and deputizing themselves. It's not the wild west. We need law and order. In the days of the west the sheriffs of towns started making everyone drop off their guns for this reason.

Yep! This is a ridiculous self defense claim of murdering unarmed people. Then turn around and trying to tell people we should all be armed. It's crazy!

He had no business going there in the first place...PERIOD!

LMAO....so what? It's a video!

That's just it. Too many of these people feel entitled. They think they can do whatever they want. It's sad. Too bad the camera phone was invented. That interupted their good time. Now they have to be A C C O U N T A B L E!

I am pretty sure you people have no idea of what self defense is. Just because someone is belligerent that isn't self defense. You go to a riot where there is looting I would think you would expect to find people that are belligerent no? It's a riot where there is looting and dangerous people....so that's why you loaded up a weapon to confront them. That isn't self defense. You initiated the confrontation by going there in the first place and deputizing yourself.

What you people have to understand is this isn't a police officer going to a crime scene. This is an underaged POS going there to dole out his version of cowboy justice. He is not any different than anyone else that that riot if you ask me. Every single person there is accountable for being there. He is no exception to the rule.

Not if there is a retrial.

Oh...didn't know about the "with prejudice" part. That's different yes.

OMFG lmfao! Had everything. Stupidity, brainwashed sheep mentality, support for woke fascist liberalism, denial, confusion, backtracking, trolling, and getting totally owned. Didn’t read a single word. Total clown thread.
 
He had no business going there in the first place...PERIOD!
But the looters, rioters, convicted child molosters, etc did? Got it. It’s a first amendment right until it turns into an unlawful assembly. People have the right to bare arms and protect them selves and their places of work from attack/terrorism when their government fails to act. Scratch that. It’s in the constitution under the second amendment that it’s not only the inalienable right, it’s the duty of all Americans to protect their country. That entire city was literally under attack.
 
But the looters, rioters, convicted child molosters, etc did? Got it. It’s a first amendment right until it turns into an unlawful assembly. People have the right to bare arms and protect them selves and their places of work from attack/terrorism when their government fails to act. Scratch that. It’s in the constitution under the second amendment that it’s not only the inalienable right, it’s the duty of all Americans to protect their country. That entire city was literally under attack.
There has to be way to find out who is funding these misfits who are paid by wealthy individuals to blend in with Antifa and BLM thereby trying to make it look as though everyone in these groups are bad people.
 
But the looters, rioters, convicted child molosters, etc did? Got it. It’s a first amendment right until it turns into an unlawful assembly. People have the right to bare arms and protect them selves and their places of work from attack/terrorism when their government fails to act. Scratch that. It’s in the constitution under the second amendment that it’s not only the inalienable right, it’s the duty of all Americans to protect their country. That entire city was literally under attack.
It didnt help matters when DJT walked down a street holding a bible in front of a church followed by law enforcement officers using tear gas and flash grenades on demonstrators. This reinforces those folks who own guns and taken upon themselves to enforce the law. DJT encouraged folks like Rittenhouse to feel embolden to take up arms. Of course Repubs were dead silent. SMDH
 
There has to be way to find out who is funding these misfits who are paid by wealthy individuals to blend in with Antifa and BLM thereby trying to make it look as though everyone in these groups are bad people.
Very easy to do. Start with Soros, Southern Poverty Law Center and go through the DNC's list of top donors. That will be the buffet menu of those funding the scum growing on Sh*t that are burning, looting and attacking/killing innocent citizens in our cities. Also look at recently released violent felons from cities with Soros funded DA's. Garcon, Kim Fox, Kim Gardner to name a few.. Then Google "Kamala Harris paid their bail".
 
Last edited:
It didnt help matters when DJT walked down a street holding a bible in front of a church followed by law enforcement officers using tear gas and flash grenades on demonstrators. This reinforces those folks who own guns and taken upon themselves to enforce the law. DJT encouraged folks like Rittenhouse to feel embolden to take up arms. Of course Repubs were dead silent. SMDH
Authorities in Dem cities that turn their heads to thugs, and allow lawlessness to take over their cities, is what emboldens normal people to take up arms to defend themselves.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT