ADVERTISEMENT

Denial

Actually, you're wrong. Mueller has the charge to investigate the following:

(i) any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump; and (ii) any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation; and (iii) any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a).

It may also help if you read the actual document authorizing Mueller to take on his role.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download

Furthermore, deflecting blame for these treasonous acts on Obama is laughable. If Trump and his crew hadn't conspired with the Russians we wouldn't be in this mess. The proper thing for Trump and his peeps to have done when contacted by Russians was to contact the FBI. Why didn't they?
Who is deflecting? Election meddling was under Obama, period, just own it already.

Collusion by Trump is TBD, so far batting zero.
 
I for one think that the leadership in the chambers of congress nailed their investigation....Oh, wait....

37076669_2202566659756958_4007408979150897152_n.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: cems52
Well let’s not get carried away here. While I don’t think the President will be impeached, that action would have grave consequences for the pubs.

Won't matter, don't forget who the Vice President is.
 
Trump is not getting charged with Russia Collusion. They only thing they can get him on is financial crimes if they can find it. I don’t think he’s squeaky clean, nobody with that amount of money can be.

How many Americans have been charged with obstruction or collusion?

Obama knew and did nothing, this is a fact. But, to his defense, this has been going on a long time. What makes it funny is, now,
Just so happens, a huge story was coked up to discredit Trump just Incase Hillary lost. See Peter Strzok, and his “insurance policy” text.

My next question is......

If Trump is never charged with any crime, obstruction, or collusion, will the board Demwits except the findings? Nope!

You know what they’ll revert back too? The FBI, DOJ, are corrupt, which is what they have said for the past 20 years. Or they’ll say Muller is a Republican and he let Trump off the hook.
 
Trump is not getting charged with Russia Collusion. They only thing they can get him on is financial crimes if they can find it. I don’t think he’s squeaky clean, nobody with that amount of money can be.

How many Americans have been charged with obstruction or collusion?

Obama knew and did nothing, this is a fact. But, to his defense, this has been going on a long time. What makes it funny is, now,
Just so happens, a huge story was coked up to discredit Trump just Incase Hillary lost. See Peter Strzok, and his “insurance policy” text.

My next question is......

If Trump is never charged with any crime, obstruction, or collusion, will the board Demwits except the findings? Nope!

You know what they’ll revert back too? The FBI, DOJ, are corrupt, which is what they have said for the past 20 years. Or they’ll say Muller is a Republican and he let Trump off the hook.
First of all this excuse that nobody with a lot of money is squeaky clean is ridiculous. That's not an excuse because he asked for this job. It wasn't forced on him and he is expected to be squeaky clean if he is going to do this job. The idea that you can sell access to our democracy because everyone with that kind of money isn't squeaky clean is simply put the most ridiculous thing I have ever read on the topic. Access to our government is NOT FOR SALE!

Second of all nothing was cooked up. His administration is accountable like every other administration. The excuse that Obama did something wrong is also unacceptable. If you are president you are accountable for your own actions.

Thirdly, there is no law in this country we all have to talk nice about the POTUS. So, this think with Peter S is a complete waste of time and my tax payer money. HE doesn't have to like Trump....and needs evidence if he is going to charge him. You can't charge someone because you don't like them at this level. Trump has expensive lawyers for that.

We expect our president to not break the law. That isn't too much to ask frankly. Financial crimes, or colluding with Russia, if he broke the law he will be impeached as he should be. We have had presidents impeached for breaking the law and he is absolutely no exception to the rule.

Trumps administration is indicted for crimes and he hired them so he is not free if he doesn't get charged. They are his people. He brought them here.
 
Last edited:
So does Trump. Who would go raw on a porn star?
That alone disqualifies him from being my president....lol. If you aren't smart enough not to go raw dog on a porn star, I can't trust you to make decisions regarding my country.
 
Who is deflecting? Election meddling was under Obama, period, just own it already.

Collusion by Trump is TBD, so far batting zero.
You guys are pathetic with your nonstop crap of deflecting blame on Obama and the Clintons for Trump's incompetence. Take accountability and govern.
 
First of all this excuse that nobody with a lot of money is squeaky clean is ridiculous. That's not an excuse because he asked for this job. It wasn't forced on him and he is expected to be squeaky clean if he is going to do this job. The idea that you can sell access to our democracy because everyone with that kind of money isn't squeaky clean is simply put the most ridiculous thing I have ever read on the topic. Access to our government is NOT FOR SALE!

Second of all nothing was cooked up. His administration is accountable like every other administration. The excuse that Obama did something wrong is also unacceptable. If you are president you are accountable for your own actions.

Thirdly, there is no law in this country we all have to talk nice about the POTUS. So, this think with Peter S is a complete waste of time and my tax payer money. HE doesn't have to like Trump....and needs evidence if he is going to charge him. You can't charge someone because you don't like them at this level. Trump has expensive lawyers for that.

We expect our president to not break the law. That isn't too much to ask frankly. Financial crimes, or colluding with Russia, if he broke the law he will be impeached as he should be. We have had presidents impeached for breaking the law and he is absolutely no exception to the rule.

Trumps administration is indicted for crimes and he hired them so he is not free if he doesn't get charged. They are his people. He brought them here.

This is the biggest reach post from you yet. Full of “if and buts”. Nothing you said made any sense. I would argue with you but it’s waste of time. “So he’s not free if he isn’t charged with crimes?” Sounds racist to me! You proved my point.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: grbcane
This is the biggest reach post from you yet. Full of “if and buts”. Nothing you said made any sense. I would argue with you but it’s waste of time. “So he’s not free if he isn’t charged with crimes?” Sounds racist to me! You proved my point.
Not hard to understand. Race has absolutely nothing to do with it. It's just the part of the narrative the right has taken in defense of their own positions. Not one time did I mention race. There are no people of color that are under any indictments that I know of but that isn't what I brought up. The right is just ridiculous with it. They make everything about race to defend their own positions.

Who hired or appointed all of the Americans that are indicted? That's why you don't want to argue about it. It all leads back to Trump! All of it! Mueller will get it on and Poppin....STRAIGHT FACTS!
 
  • Like
Reactions: cems52
You guys are pathetic with your nonstop crap of deflecting blame on Obama and the Clintons for Trump's incompetence. Take accountability and govern.
Who's deflecting now? Obama owns it, did nothing like the pssy he is, scared of Putin.
 
If Obama is so scared of Putin why did he stand up to him and kill Exxon Mobiles Trillion dollar drilling deal with him? That's how much Putin stood to make. He sanctioned Putin and enforced them. Cost him literally over a trillion dollars to a two trillion dollar economy. I hope you guys have something better than this narrative.
 
Another deflector... Obama knew of the meddling before the election, which means it had been going on for some time, he chose to do nothing.

I think he is a pssy, you think not....
 
Barack didn’t do anything in hopes he’d catch Candidate Trump working with them. Besides, he really didn’t care if Hillary won or not.

Another deflector... Obama knew of the meddling before the election, which means it had been going on for some time, he chose to do nothing.

I think he is a pssy, you think not....
 
Barack didn’t do anything in hopes he’d catch Candidate Trump working with them. Besides, he really didn’t care if Hillary won or not.
I think he thought Hillary would win and didn't want to upset the apple cart, you know the red reset button and all...
 
  • Like
Reactions: grbcane
He just didn’t like the Clintons and still don’t for that matter.
The prior admin wanted better relations with Russia, hence the stupid reset button, and were willing to overlook the Russian meddling. These same cucks and their sheep now criticize Trump for wanting the same opportunity and blame the Russian meddling on him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: grbcane
It’s noise!

The prior admin wanted better relations with Russia, hence the stupid reset button, and were willing to overlook the Russian meddling. These same cucks and their sheep now criticize Trump for wanting the same opportunity and blame the Russian meddling on him.
 
The prior admin wanted better relations with Russia, hence the stupid reset button, and were willing to overlook the Russian meddling. These same cucks and their sheep now criticize Trump for wanting the same opportunity and blame the Russian meddling on him.
Man, you're a trip with this bullshzzt. Lol
 
Barack Obama is not president now. It is really not a good argument to say Trump doesn't need to defend our country because Obama didn't if this is your premise. It just isn't a sound premise even if I say okay Obama didn't stand up to Putin. So I don't know why you guys constantly beat this drum. It just isn't a good defense. We need Trump to stand up to Putin because he is the President now. Brarack is not the President any longer.
 
Barack Obama is not president now. It is really not a good argument to say Trump doesn't need to defend our country because Obama didn't if this is your premise. It just isn't a sound premise even if I say okay Obama didn't stand up to Putin. So I don't know why you guys constantly beat this drum. It just isn't a good defense. We need Trump to stand up to Putin because he is the President now. Brarack is not the President any longer.


You got beat own it, it’s okay, Cems got me a while back, and I owned it.
 
You got beat own it, it’s okay, Cems got me a while back, and I owned it.
Beat on what? Again, you can't have it both ways. You guys have lowered the bar for the stable genius to the point that he doesn't have to do anything. All you have to do is point to everyone else. Who he hires or appoints, Barack, or HIlliary or the DNC. Everyone what what his job is. Sorry, that won't work and people like Cems, myself and others see this. We aren't going to allow you to do this. If you want to claim Trump as president then it is time to hold him accountable for the job. Period! It's time for him to defend this country and it's allies and we aren't seeing. Blaming Obama doesn't cut the mustard. IT's time to be accountable!
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT