π π π π π π π π π π π 1-50 yep everyone shaking in their boots
18 states have now joined Texas Lawsuit headed for SCOTUS
- Thread starter edtuna
- Start date
π π π π π π π π π π π 1-50 yep everyone shaking in their boots
You need not look at the news to deduce that Trump is a dictator. One simply needs not to be a moron and look at Trumps actions and listen to his words!
Meanwhile, 106 republican members of the house have thrown their support behind Texas AG Ken Paxton's law suit against the 4 swing states that confirmed Biden's victory. They have all wilted, crumbled to DJT breathing down their necks.
They should all read the 10th amendment of the constitution which defines states rights.
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
They should all read the 10th amendment of the constitution which defines states rights.
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
What a stupid hypocrite you are little cd. That is why your dislike so much.,You tell Someone to watch name calling like a three year old and I got post after post were your the one with the disgusting name calling. See what you do not understand it does not matter to us your so call name calling. Get off your knees and pull your pants up and become a big boy.
I too thought it was hypocritical for CD to whine about name calling. He probably refers to someone in a nasty way 5 times a day. However I guess he gets some leeway in that he must post 250 times a day. He is a legend in his own mind.
Cash let's assume you are correct. You aren't but ill assume you are. The law and the secretary of state's application of the law was challenged in courts pre-election and the challenges failed. So election day comes and the citizens of PA voted in accordance with the law in place. A law passed by the legislature, signed by the governor, and upheld by the courts pre-election.
Here's my question to you. Let's assume based on whatever legal technicality you can think of (there isn't one but you can make it up for this exercise) that the PA law ends of being unconstitutional. What remedy are you looking for? It's a rhetorical question and I already know the answer. You literally want the Supreme Court to find some technicality so that the votes casted by the people of PA are disregarded and the legislature appoints the electors for Trump. This despite the citizens of PA voting in accordance with a law passed by their government and upheld by their courts. Shame on you cash. You should never have the nerve to call anyone anti-American again. Because what you want to happen is as anti-American as it gets. Disgusting that you represent law enforcement.
Which court? Thatβs a Supreme Court issue if governance by the state was unconstitutional. A local court or state court for that matter would be an improper venue.
The PA Supreme Court. I am glad to see you acknowledge that what you want is to have the vote of the citizens of PA to be thrown out completely on some technicality. You're anti-American and a disgrace to law enforcement.
They do know this and are doing it anyway. Staying in power and protecting their corrupt overlord is priority number one, even if it means selling out the country in the process.
π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£
I put that out to see how you trumpers would respond. Humor. π
I see what angle youβre working here lol. Prove those were all legitimate legal votes and Iβll agree to your premise. This whole thing is a sham and will get decided in SCOTUS. Enjoy the results
SCOTUS? Donβt hold your breath, Cash, Ed et al.
* not clear that one state can sue another state for noncompliance with its own election laws. No standing.
* not clear that SCOTUS is the correct venue for any such lawsuit. Donβt you have to challenge state law in the courts of that state? No jurisdiction.
* the allegations in Texasβ lawsuit are not backed by evidence established in prior legal attempts to overturn the election. Those allegations were dismissed way before any court consideration of evidence. As a result what βfactsβ or βevidenceβ would you expect SCOTUS to review? There are none.
* SCOTUS is being asked to throw out the entire election results in the battleground states. Is that the correct remedy for the alleged violation of state election laws? Donβt think so.
* why would SCOTUS insert itself in a post election political dispute? Makes no sense. Could undermine the perceived neutrality of the judicial branch and forever smear the reputation of the SCOTUS. Too dangerous a precedent.
The lead AG in this case is the Texas AG. He is under ongoing investigation for corruption. Iβm looking forward to that matter after this case is dismissed by SCOTUS.
Uhggg itβs not the fact the legislation changed the laws, itβs the fact they unconstitutionally changed the laws.
Supreme Court rejected π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£ππ€£π€£π€£π
Based on standing. Alito & Thomas both agreed and stated TX had no standing in the matter, which I agree and disagree but was unsure in how theyβd see it.
Hopefully we can all put this mess behind us and go forward. However, unfortunately, this President wonβt admit the loss and will order his minions to make a show on the floor of Congress for no other reason for his own selfishness. This is the case as this whole charade clearly harms our republic!
Thanks. I am enjoying the results you anti-American POS. Take your "brilliant" lawsuit and shove it up your ass. You're a disgrace
I just read the courtβs order:
The State of Texas has βno standingβ to challenge how another state conducts its elections. The motion to file a complaint by the State of Texas is therefor denied. βAll other pending motions are dismissed as moot.β
Trumpβs legal door to overturn the election results has been slammed shut by SCOTUS. Period. Over.
The State of Texas has βno standingβ to challenge how another state conducts its elections. The motion to file a complaint by the State of Texas is therefor denied. βAll other pending motions are dismissed as moot.β
Trumpβs legal door to overturn the election results has been slammed shut by SCOTUS. Period. Over.
Lost means it was found against them. They found there was No standing for TX. It can be refilled in the state court
Wow Angry Lou is back! You ****s steal an election & are perfectly ok with it so your child sniffing, China owned dementiated crustacean can carry your Marxist ideals! You call me anti-American, eat shit! I hope your old ass strokes out!
I wouldnβt say slammed shut but each state will have to do their own work
zero evidence and liar in office is trying to save his ass from going to prison. Facts are facts. Trump was trying to twist anything he could way before election to protect himself as always. He presented a bs idea and the sheep followed and still follow. This was planed and presented before the election to keep the dictator out of jail. The answer will be FAILURE. Lock him up π
You sound angry cash. Lol. I love it. You're a disgrace to your profession
YES....in a nut shell this is pretty much the case.....LOL. He will resign in a few weeks so Pence can pardon him but that AG in New York closed any loop hole that would save him from state prosecution. He is in deep doo.
With 17 republican State Attorneys General claiming fraud they crapped on Americans who stood in line for hours to cast their votes and more importantly risked their health in doing so. No further proof is needed to show republicans advocate voter suppression and are the party of autocracy.
Respectfully disagree. Why should my honest vote be nullified by a vote of a dead person, illegal alien or someone that does have a legal right to vote? That my friend is the definition of voter suppression.
I am sure you will post again when your hair brained conspiracy theory is proven false? NOT!!!
CD, will you make a Gary/Rivals approved and backied agreement. If your post comes true i.e. (Trump resignation/Pence Pardon of Trump) , I will never post again on the Lounge. If your post does not come true, you will never again post on the Lounge ? Are you ready to put your money where your mouth is?
This is stupid...but I am not surprised. It's my opinion. You have your opinion. I say a lot of things here that are correct and a lot of things that end up being wrong. I post my opinion every day here for about 15 years. I said the supreme court would n't hear Trumps completely unamerican attempt to have an election handed to him dictator style and I was right (even though you know me. I never like to say I am right). SCOTUS wouldn't even hear that crap. It's stupid like everything Trump does. So, the only chance for Trump not to do this is his ego and the fact that it wouldn't matter. NY state is gonna show him how we give it up and that pardon wouldn't help anyway.
All of which are nonexistent. Why didn't they win in any court in the country with these allegations? Not one court, including some republican appointed judges, found sufficient evidence existed to throw out one vote due to fraud. Why do you think that is?
You're right. I shouldn't talk about your profession. You're a disgrace as a citizen of this country. Now go away and try to think of a new way to overturn election results.
