So you intentionally posted a zero agenda post that confirmed Obama's numbers were better than Trumps's, which I said and you called fake news.
You then went on to seek support for said post that you actually read even though it confirms my original statement
I decided to laugh at you for posting an article that proves Obama's numbers were better
You decide to pretend the purpose of the article wasn't to counter my original statement about Obama's numbers
And then you needed to defend yourself as if you read it even though you then say you don't agree with the "no agenda" article
So do you agree with your "excellent article" or not? It is a simple yes or no question that I think "a man" could answer without getting pissy. And yes, I still stand by my assumption that your post was meant to defend Trump and that you wither have the reading comprehension of a 5 year old, or didn't bother reading the article.