Good point, I believe much of the info was withheld for privacy. I'm not positive however that's how it was explained to me. At the same time CNN is now actually proven to be full of shit by the Courts!!I have no idea who is right, but I can say the judge did a poor job of outlining the issues in decision. From reading decision, all I know is that CNN reported on infants with open heart surgery and basically alleged it was large complication rate at a locale hospital compared to national norms. The Judge never wrote what the actual national complication rate was, or how CNN was wrong, so without that info can't really know who is right. It seems the Judge thinks CNN misinterpreted data, but Judge does not explain how.
Ozona we can find one or maybe even two cases were all news outlets have given us misinformed info. Does that make them fake news?Good point, I believe much of the info was withheld for privacy. I'm not positive however that's how it was explained to me. At the same time CNN is now actually proven to be full of shit by the Courts!!
All if it, no. However CNN preaches the sanctuary of the courns why doesn't it apply when it rules against them. Can't have it both ways. What they only respect the court if it agrees with their beliefs?Ozona we can find one or maybe even two cases were all news outlets have given us misinformed info. Does that make them fake news?