Governor DeSantis names the real Woman's swimming winner

[central17]

Thank God that Florida has a Governor that can see the trees from the forest and girl parts from boy parts. He has named the true winner, Emma Weyant a woman from Sarasota. She did everything the right way and earned the championship only to have it stolen by some woke joke.

 

[NO.SHORECANE]

Congrats to the Governor and the legitimate winner.

 

[El Cubano]

Thank God that Florida has a Governor that can see the trees from the forest and girl parts from boy parts. He has named the true winner, Emma Weyant a woman from Sarasota. She did everything the right way and earned the championship only to have it stolen by some woke joke.

Love this guy and to think we could of had the ASS thunder boy as Gov.

 

[krvanness]

Love this guy and to think we could of had the ASS thunder boy as Gov.

It's both chilling and sobering to think how close that race was.

 

[pastorCane]

It's both chilling and sobering to think how close that race was.

What the other guy's name Gilliam? They found him in the hotel with the male escort doing meth (or something like that). He was the one who benefitted the most when Covid virus started to hit the news.... We were one very close election from being a lockdown state. Elections matter especially the local ones.

 

[claboo]

Thank God that Florida has a Governor that can see the trees from the forest and girl parts from boy parts. He has named the true winner, Emma Weyant a woman from Sarasota. She did everything the right way and earned the championship only to have it stolen by some woke joke.

As much as I despise this Trump wannabe clown, I agree wholeheartedly with this action. I'm totally against trans gender men/women (not sure what they call it), competing against females in any athletic event outside of maybe shooting pool, or that new so called, corn hole sport.
It's completely ridiculous and unfair, to allow a biological male to compete against biological females in any sport that requires physical strength and stamina.

If they can't have a baby and breast feed with their God given parts (absent women with medical issues), they have no business competing athletically against those who can.

Maybe they should create trans gender sporting leagues for those who feel the need or desire to compete athletically.......to go along with trans gender public bathrooms.

 

[central17]

As much as I despise this Trump wannabe clown, I agree wholeheartedly with this action. I'm totally against trans gender men/women (not sure what they call it), competing against females in any athletic event outside of maybe shooting pool, or that new so called, corn hole sport.
It's completely ridiculous and unfair, to allow a biological male to compete against biological females in any sport that requires physical strength and stamina.

If they can't have a baby and breast feed with their God given parts (absent women with medical issues), they have no business competing athletically against those who can.

Maybe they should create trans gender sporting leagues for those who feel the need or desire to compete athletically.......to go along with trans gender public bathrooms.

You are slowly finding your way to our side, LOL!
Yes we can agree on some things.

So now to stir things up, why can't Supreme Court nominee Ketanje Brown Jackson answer what her definition of a woman is? Rather she answered that "She does not know, that she is not a Biologist." It is only a matter of time till this transgender BS makes it to the Supreme Court. If she had just answered the question in plain English like you did in your post, it would have been "game over" she will be approved in a bipartisan manner. Can you honestly find fault in Republican's to vote against her confirmation because they are concerned she will "find" that there is no male or female in the constitution or subsequent law?

 

[miked05]

You are slowly finding your way to our side, LOL!
Yes we can agree on some things.

So now to stir things up, why can't Supreme Court nominee Ketanje Brown Jackson answer what her definition of a woman is? Rather she answered that "She does not know, that she is not a Biologist." It is only a matter of time till this transgender BS makes it to the Supreme Court. If she had just answered the question in plain English like you did in your post, it would have been "game over" she will be approved in a bipartisan manner. Can you honestly find fault in Republican's to vote against her confirmation because they are concerned she will "find" that there is no male or female in the constitution or subsequent law?

The same reason the supreme court can't answer what pornography is. It will step on too many toes/cost donors too much money to give a straight answer. That's what politicians do. They talk in circles. They don't give straight answers. And the supreme court is just that. A political group.

 

[claboo]

You are slowly finding your way to our side, LOL!
Yes we can agree on some things.

So now to stir things up, why can't Supreme Court nominee Ketanje Brown Jackson answer what her definition of a woman is? Rather she answered that "She does not know, that she is not a Biologist." It is only a matter of time till this transgender BS makes it to the Supreme Court. If she had just answered the question in plain English like you did in your post, it would have been "game over" she will be approved in a bipartisan manner. Can you honestly find fault in Republican's to vote against her confirmation because they are concerned she will "find" that there is no male or female in the constitution or subsequent law?

Yes we do disagree on the Supreme Court nominee. IMO, that whole thing is a smoke screen to vote against her for OBVIOUS reasons. Had she answered exactly in the manner in which they wanted, they would have found yet another policy or ruling to hold against her. I don't trust the Right to do what's right for this country when race is a factor.

Now, do I think all Rep. politicians are racist......absolutely not, in fact I'm sure most aren't. However many of them cater to their constituents when matters of race are at the forefront, to maintain votes as opposed to simply doing what's right and what's fair.....and we know what the racial make up of the Rep. party is for the most part.

What has been happening in those hearings to this VERY qualified woman of color is disgraceful and wreaks of yet more racial injustice that we as black folk have become so accustomed to. So nothing about it has surprised me.

 

[central17]

Yes we do disagree on the Supreme Court nominee. IMO, that whole thing is a smoke screen to vote against her for OBVIOUS reasons. Had she answered exactly in the manner in which they wanted, they would have found yet another policy or ruling to hold against her. I don't trust the Right to do what's right for this country when race is a factor.

Now, do I think all Rep. politicians are racist......absolutely not, in fact I'm sure most aren't. However many of them cater to their constituents when matters of race are at the forefront, to maintain votes as opposed to simply doing what's right and what's fair.....and we know what the racial make up of the Rep. party is for the most part.

What has been happening in those hearings to this VERY qualified woman of color is disgraceful and wreaks of yet more racial injustice that we as black folk have become so accustomed to. So nothing about it has surprised me.

IMO, Michelle Childs would have been a far better nominee for SCOTUS. But as he typically does, Biden caved to the whacko left wing of the democrat party. Brown Jackson is a far left progressive with a radical social track record of attempting to legistlate from the bench. Back to the OP about the transgender swimmer, if Brown Jackson refuses to draw hard line between male and female then how could she rule that having a shlong disqualifies one from competing as a female.

Childs had the support of James Clyburn AND two announced Republican's, Lindsey Graham and Tim Scott. Many Republican Senators would have followed Lindsey's lead. Childs probably could have received 75 votes, possibly more. Biden could have been a unifier with Childs, but he chose the most partisan option possible.

And on the subject of prejudice, why the hate towards anyone not from an Ivy League law school being considered less qualified. Why can't a young person aspire to go to law school at University of Miami, Texas, Southern Cal, Indiana, etc. and be on the Supreme Court? The current SCOTUS is full of Ivy league grads and is one of the most disfunctional in history. How about some educational and geographic diversity being brought into the court?