ADVERTISEMENT

The next target of the COVID left.

Right now any problems with the Covid spread or the Vaccine rollout still belong to Trump...Eventually we will be able to start blaming Biden, but it’s too soon..
 
  • Like
Reactions: cems52
Actually, the high levels of Covid-19 throughout the country is due to maskless followers of that POS ex-president Donald Trump. Masks save lives. Wear your dam mask!!
 
cems52 said:
Here ya go. Trump's maskless WH was a cesspool of Covid-19.
Click to expand...
296488_image.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allied2651, krvanness and central17
cems52 said:
Actually, the high levels of Covid-19 throughout the country is due to maskless followers of that POS ex-president Donald Trump. Masks save lives. Wear your dam mask!!
Click to expand...
According to a Jan study by the CDC, cloth masks alone are only 44.3% effective against the virus, and that is in a laboratory under ideal conditions. The virus was going to spread regardless of whether or not you wore a face diaper. Has Dementia Joe got the deaths to 0 yet?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allied2651 and canesgotscrewedagain
CaneBandit said:
No one stated per capita. You’re trying too hard and drowning
Click to expand...
That's the point you're talking about absolute numbers between states of different sizes. California is also the richest state with the biggest economy. I bet you'd be all about per capita stats if that was the conversation.

Despite having huge densely populated metro areas, California has below average COVID deaths. Despite have 6 cows between every person in South Dakota they've killed all their old people.

I'm sorry my initial point was too subtle for you to understand.
 
801canesmxer said:
According to a Jan study by the CDC, cloth masks alone are only 44.3% effective against the virus, and that is in a laboratory under ideal conditions. The virus was going to spread regardless of whether or not you wore a face diaper. Has Dementia Joe got the deaths to 0 yet?
Click to expand...

Wrong!! Here is what the CDC says about mask wearing. Your results probably came from the CDC under Trump's tenure. This is a tweet from the CDC this week.

In lab tests with dummies, exposure to potentially infectious aerosols decreased by about 95% when they both wore tightly fitted masks, a new
@CDCMMWR
finds. #WearAMask
that fits tightly to your face to stop the spread of #COVID19. More: http://bit.ly/MMWR21021.
11:15 AM · Feb 10, 2021·Sprout Social
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raoul2
Sugar-Cane said:
That's the point you're talking about absolute numbers between states of different sizes. California is also the richest state with the biggest economy. I bet you'd be all about per capita stats if that was the conversation.

Despite having huge densely populated metro areas, California has below average COVID deaths. Despite have 6 cows between every person in South Dakota they've killed all their old people.

I'm sorry my initial point was too subtle for you to understand.
Click to expand...
No one stated per capita
 
cems52 said:
Wrong!! Here is what the CDC says about mask wearing. Your results probably came from the CDC under Trump's tenure. This is a tweet from the CDC this week.

In lab tests with dummies, exposure to potentially infectious aerosols decreased by about 95% when they both wore tightly fitted masks, a new
@CDCMMWR
finds. #WearAMask
that fits tightly to your face to stop the spread of #COVID19. More: http://bit.ly/MMWR21021.
11:15 AM · Feb 10, 2021·Sprout Social
Click to expand...
Try again. The article I saw was from Feb 10 and your 95% is only when both are wearing double masks. One experiment put that number at 92.5%. In the other experiment, cloth masks alone were 44.3% effective. Sorry to burst your bubble. This was from a Reuters article that appeared on our local KSL.com. I'm surprised you didn't read the rest of the CDC information.
 
801canesmxer said:
Try again. The article I saw was from Feb 10 and your 95% is only when both are wearing double masks. One experiment put that number at 92.5%. In the other experiment, cloth masks alone were 44.3% effective. Sorry to burst your bubble. This was from a Reuters article that appeared on our local KSL.com. I'm surprised you didn't read the rest of the CDC information.
Click to expand...
I did read the entire article. I cherry picked what I wanted to share. Regardless, wearing a mask does provide a level of prevention. Republicans should wear their dam masks. Stop spreading COVID-19.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raoul2
cems52 said:
I did read the entire article. I cherry picked what I wanted to share. Regardless, wearing a mask does provide a level of prevention. Republicans should wear their dam masks. Stop spreading COVID-19.
Click to expand...
Yes, a less than 50-50 chance that it will stop the virus should you get exposed to it. Of course, I cherry picked a bit too. Are you mad at Joe for going maskless on Fed property right after he made that illegal for the rest of us? Was he setting a bad example for Americans by his actions, or is that different now?
 
  • Like
Reactions: canesgotscrewedagain
801canesmxer said:
Yes, a less than 50-50 chance that it will stop the virus should you get exposed to it. Of course, I cherry picked a bit too. Are you mad at Joe for going maskless on Fed property right after he made that illegal for the rest of us? Was he setting a bad example for Americans by his actions, or is that different now?
Click to expand...
Now you're being silly. You watching the trial?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 801canesmxer
CaneBandit said:
No one stated per capita
Click to expand...
Sorry I forgot you can't read well. Let me try this one more time.

You used absolute stats in a situation where you should have used per capita stats.

I said, "do you know what per capita stats are?", making fun of your obvious misapplication of basic stats.

You said, I never said per capita, thinking it was a come back, but actually made yourself look even stupider.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raoul2 and cems52
cems52 said:
Now you're being silly. You watching the trial?
Click to expand...
But Joe's the boss now, shouldn't he be setting a better example of mask wearing? Not interested in the trial, or even how it turns out, TBH. I'll have jokes and smartass comments regardless of the outcome. Getting some deep cleaning done today and waiting for the snow to come in the next few days, just some cold rain so far.
 
801canesmxer said:
But Joe's the boss now, shouldn't he be setting a better example of mask wearing? Not interested in the trial, or even how it turns out, TBH. I'll have jokes and smartass comments regardless of the outcome. Getting some deep cleaning done today and waiting for the snow to come in the next few days, just some cold rain so far.
Click to expand...
Enjoy my friend.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 801canesmxer
Sugar-Cane said:
Sorry I forgot you can't read well. Let me try this one more time.

You used absolute stats in a situation where you should have used per capita stats.

I said, "do you know what per capita stats are?", making fun of your obvious misapplication of basic stats.

You said, I never said per capita, thinking it was a come back, but actually made yourself look even stupider.
Click to expand...
Once again, no one said per capita. My statement as written is accurate. What you said doesn’t matter.
 
801canesmxer said:
Yes, a less than 50-50 chance that it will stop the virus should you get exposed to it. Of course, I cherry picked a bit too. Are you mad at Joe for going maskless on Fed property right after he made that illegal for the rest of us? Was he setting a bad example for Americans by his actions, or is that different now?
Click to expand...
And now that he's had the vaccination, you'd think he'd show some leadership and go maskless to serve as an example for the scared rabbits. But then again, that might be offensive to his base who want this thing to keep going...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allied2651, canesgotscrewedagain and 801canesmxer
CaneBandit said:
Once again, no one said per capita. My statement as written is accurate. What you said doesn’t matter.
Click to expand...
Let me flip this for you and maybe this will help you out.

Let's say I said: "California is the richest state with the biggest economy. Every state should copy California's policy to be economically successful."

You then says: "Uh that's because it has the most people, per capita it's not the richest state."

Then I said "UHHH NO ONE SAID PER CAPITA, WHAT IS SAID WAS TRUE. NAH NAH NAH NAH NAH."

So do you think California is the richest most successful state or don't you?
 
Sugar-Cane said:
Let me flip this for you and maybe this will help you out.

Let's say I said: "California is the richest state with the biggest economy. Every state should copy California's policy to be economically successful."

You then says: "Uh that's because it has the most people, per capita it's not the richest state."

Then I said "UHHH NO ONE SAID PER CAPITA, WHAT IS SAID WAS TRUE. NAH NAH NAH NAH NAH."

So do you think California is the richest most successful state or don't you?
Click to expand...
Oh boy, someone is still trying too hard
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Allied2651, canesgotscrewedagain and krvanness
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

HJCane

Op-Ed Seattle Times "Seattle Bungled Defund The Police"

Replies
0
Views
275
Open Board
HJCane
HJCane
Impaler

Awesomely-unsuspected news for 1 of our 2 QB's at (2022)-Elite 11 Finals: Final Composite Ranking of the nations (subjective/on paper), top-20 QBs.

Replies
2
Views
825
Canes Talk
NO.SHORECANE
N
doerunn

Are They Censoring Terrorists or Pedophiles?” – Aaron Rodgers Drops The Mic on Covid Censorship; Takes Shot At Biden’s Legitimacy As President – “I Gu

Replies
2
Views
723
Open Board
NO.SHORECANE
N
C

SCOTUS pick - Biden again sells out to the FAR left (long)

Replies
84
Views
2K
Open Board
honeyiv
honeyiv
doerunn

HUGE: Uttar Pradesh, India Announces State Is COVID-19 Free Proving the Effectiveness of “Deworming Drug” IVERMECTIN

Replies
14
Views
1K
Open Board
sabrose
sabrose
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back