A file has been shared using Link Sharing.
(Expires: Nov 2, 2020)
Large file , hope you enjoy reading
Large file , hope you enjoy reading
The Senate report on the Bidens
- Thread starter Allied2651
- Start date
Saved it in many different locations just in case it disappears.A file has been shared using Link Sharing.
(Expires: Nov 2, 2020)
Large file , hope you enjoy reading
It's 87 pages but it is quick reading. You could also just go to the conclusions in each section and get an overall idea as to the committee's findings. Frankly, after reading it twice, there are not any new revelations, however it does re enforce the Biden's and several others massive corruption.
I don't believe there was anything sensitive in the documents, just findings.
Read it if you can. The corruption is unreal. This is a bi partisan committee. The corruption will catch up with the Bidens, John Kerry and others in time.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In late 2013 and into 2014, mass protests erupted in Kyiv, Ukraine, demanding integration into western economies and an end to systemic corruption that had plagued the country. At least 82 people were killed during the protests, which culminated on Feb. 21 when Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych abdicated by fleeing the country. Less than two months later, over the span of only 28 days, significant events involving the Bidens unfolded.
On April 16, 2014, Vice President Biden met with his son’s business partner, Devon Archer, at the White House. Five days later, Vice President Biden visited Ukraine, and he soon after was described in the press as the “public face of the administration’s handling of Ukraine.” The day after his visit, on April 22, Archer joined the board of Burisma. Six days later, on April 28, British officials seized $23 million from the London bank accounts of Burisma’s owner, Mykola Zlochevsky. Fourteen days later, on May 12, Hunter Biden joined the board of Burisma, and over the course of the next several years, Hunter Biden and Devon Archer were paid millions of dollars from a corrupt Ukrainian oligarch for their participation on the board.
The 2014 protests in Kyiv came to be known as the Revolution of Dignity — a revolution against corruption in Ukraine. Following that revolution, Ukrainian political figures were desperate for U.S. support. Zlochevsky would have made sure relevant Ukrainian officials were well aware of Hunter’s appointment to Burisma’s board as leverage. Hunter Biden’s position on the board created an immediate potential conflict of interest that would prove to be problematic for both U.S. and Ukrainian officials and would affect the implementation of Ukraine policy.
The Chairmen’s investigation into potential conflicts of interest began in August 2019, with Chairman Grassley’s letter to the Department of Treasury regarding potential conflicts of interest with respect to Obama administration policy relating to the Henniges transaction.1 During the Obama administration, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) approved a transaction that gave control over Henniges, an American maker of anti- vibration technologies with military applications, to a Chinese government-owned aviation company and a China-based investment firm with established ties to the Chinese government. One of the companies involved in the Henniges transaction was a billion-dollar private investment fund called Bohai Harvest RST (BHR). BHR was formed in November 2013 by a merger between the Chinese-government-linked firm Bohai Capital and a company named Rosemont Seneca Partners. Rosemont Seneca was formed in 2009 by Hunter Biden, the son of then-Vice President Joe Biden, by Chris Heinz, the stepson of former Secretary of State John Kerry, and others.
Access to relevant documents and testimony has been persistently hampered by criminal investigations, impeachment proceedings, COVID-19, and several instances of obstructive behavior. Accordingly, this investigation has taken longer than it should have. The Chairmen’s efforts have always been driven by our belief that the public has the right to know about wrongdoing and conflicts of interest occurring within government, and especially those conflicts brought about by the actions of governmental officials. This is a good-government oversight investigation that relies on documents and testimony from U.S. agencies and officials, not a Russian disinformation campaign, as our Democratic colleagues have falsely stated.
What the Chairmen discovered during the course of this investigation is that the Obama administration knew that Hunter Biden’s position on Burisma’s board was problematic and did interfere in the efficient execution of policy with respect to Ukraine. Moreover, this investigation has illustrated the extent to which officials within the Obama administration ignored the glaring warning signs when the vice president’s son joined the board of a company owned by a corrupt Ukrainian oligarch. And, as will be discussed in later sections, Hunter Biden was not the only Biden who cashed in on Joe Biden’s vice presidency.
This report not only details examples of extensive and complex financial transactions involving the Bidens, it also describes the quandary other U.S. governmental officials faced as they attempted to guide and support Ukraine’s anticorruption efforts. The Committees will continue to evaluate the information and evidence as it becomes available.
In late 2013 and into 2014, mass protests erupted in Kyiv, Ukraine, demanding integration into western economies and an end to systemic corruption that had plagued the country. At least 82 people were killed during the protests, which culminated on Feb. 21 when Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych abdicated by fleeing the country. Less than two months later, over the span of only 28 days, significant events involving the Bidens unfolded.
On April 16, 2014, Vice President Biden met with his son’s business partner, Devon Archer, at the White House. Five days later, Vice President Biden visited Ukraine, and he soon after was described in the press as the “public face of the administration’s handling of Ukraine.” The day after his visit, on April 22, Archer joined the board of Burisma. Six days later, on April 28, British officials seized $23 million from the London bank accounts of Burisma’s owner, Mykola Zlochevsky. Fourteen days later, on May 12, Hunter Biden joined the board of Burisma, and over the course of the next several years, Hunter Biden and Devon Archer were paid millions of dollars from a corrupt Ukrainian oligarch for their participation on the board.
The 2014 protests in Kyiv came to be known as the Revolution of Dignity — a revolution against corruption in Ukraine. Following that revolution, Ukrainian political figures were desperate for U.S. support. Zlochevsky would have made sure relevant Ukrainian officials were well aware of Hunter’s appointment to Burisma’s board as leverage. Hunter Biden’s position on the board created an immediate potential conflict of interest that would prove to be problematic for both U.S. and Ukrainian officials and would affect the implementation of Ukraine policy.
The Chairmen’s investigation into potential conflicts of interest began in August 2019, with Chairman Grassley’s letter to the Department of Treasury regarding potential conflicts of interest with respect to Obama administration policy relating to the Henniges transaction.1 During the Obama administration, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) approved a transaction that gave control over Henniges, an American maker of anti- vibration technologies with military applications, to a Chinese government-owned aviation company and a China-based investment firm with established ties to the Chinese government. One of the companies involved in the Henniges transaction was a billion-dollar private investment fund called Bohai Harvest RST (BHR). BHR was formed in November 2013 by a merger between the Chinese-government-linked firm Bohai Capital and a company named Rosemont Seneca Partners. Rosemont Seneca was formed in 2009 by Hunter Biden, the son of then-Vice President Joe Biden, by Chris Heinz, the stepson of former Secretary of State John Kerry, and others.
Access to relevant documents and testimony has been persistently hampered by criminal investigations, impeachment proceedings, COVID-19, and several instances of obstructive behavior. Accordingly, this investigation has taken longer than it should have. The Chairmen’s efforts have always been driven by our belief that the public has the right to know about wrongdoing and conflicts of interest occurring within government, and especially those conflicts brought about by the actions of governmental officials. This is a good-government oversight investigation that relies on documents and testimony from U.S. agencies and officials, not a Russian disinformation campaign, as our Democratic colleagues have falsely stated.
What the Chairmen discovered during the course of this investigation is that the Obama administration knew that Hunter Biden’s position on Burisma’s board was problematic and did interfere in the efficient execution of policy with respect to Ukraine. Moreover, this investigation has illustrated the extent to which officials within the Obama administration ignored the glaring warning signs when the vice president’s son joined the board of a company owned by a corrupt Ukrainian oligarch. And, as will be discussed in later sections, Hunter Biden was not the only Biden who cashed in on Joe Biden’s vice presidency.
This report not only details examples of extensive and complex financial transactions involving the Bidens, it also describes the quandary other U.S. governmental officials faced as they attempted to guide and support Ukraine’s anticorruption efforts. The Committees will continue to evaluate the information and evidence as it becomes available.
A file has been shared using Link Sharing.
(Expires: Nov 2, 2020)
Large file , hope you enjoy reading
why be intellectually dishonest. These are party hack jobs. You only posted one then said it was bi partisan. That is either ignorance (you didn’t know that’s false) or a lie (you knew that’s false and didn’t care).
each side of the aisle submitted competing executive summaries prepared by their respective staffs. You can also just read the conclusions here.
Given that it was a month ago their are many think tank articles around both. You can gather which has been deemed most credible for yourself.
presenting half the story as the entire story is classic disinformation. It’s ok to lie to yourself and engage in confirmation bias but it’s really an ass move to promulgate it.
Here is the link for those who don’t want to just believe anything That’s spoon fed to them.
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/7216333/200923-FullReport-PetersHSGACWydenFinance.pdf
As long as average every day citizens fight over this party bullshit parties will continue to be divisive and control the narrative. Become self sufficient and hold ALL politicians accountable. All promises must be fulfilled or its out the door. All dealings must be above board or its out the door. Until we get there people will continue with this bullshit red and blue state crap. News flash all states are red,white and blue. Remember that fellas and things will be just fine.
Thank you. It’s unfathomable that a President literally villanizes states because of the way they voted. How is it that Biden can even state he will be President of red and blue states; of all Americans and that is a distinguishing phrase.
I want the GOP back!
My sole point, and you see to have missed it, was that it was not bi partisan, that the ranking member also released an example and I am genuinely curious as to why a full factual context wasn't provided.
Was it unknown to the OP (ignorance) or ignored out of political expediency (lies). That's an honest question.
Regardless of bipartisan it doesn’t change what the actual facts of the investigation are. These are indisputable. The Biden’s are in violation of federal law. These are the types of cases the RICO statue was designed for. It’s organized crime!
You wrote undisputed. It is LITERALLY disputed. An equal Senate body disputes it. They came to a different determination based on the facts. It can't be discounted. Undisputed is inapplicable. The link is above.
Key Findings: At the request of Ranking Members Peters and Wyden, this report sets forth for the public excerpts of over 36,000 pages of documents and all 10 interviews conducted by Committee staff. This report makes the following key findings:
The Chairmen’s Investigation Is the Outcome of a Russian Disinformation Campaign
No Evidence of Wrongdoing by Vice President Biden
No Evidence U.S.-Ukraine Policy Altered to Assist Hunter Biden
No Evidence Vice President Biden Tried to Halt a Corruption Investigation
No Evidence Any Official U.S. Government Action Favored Burisma
Those are headings. You can say its undisputed all you like, that doesn't make it true, in fact its either ignorant or a lie.
Not the same committee report. It was convenient you came up with this Homeland Security Report after the Senate report expired. I don't know where you dug yours up from but I know the report I received is legit and not just from one party.
Biden and his son are criminals. Heals up Harris will be exposed for her attack on the journalist who exposed Planned Parenthood for the selling of fetal remains. You have apparently voted for criminals whether you realize it or not.
check the time stamp, it was posted the same time. Read the link, you can compare to the one you reported.
Here is the link to your report, you can compare it with the notes you copied above.
https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/HSGAC_Finance_Report_FINAL.pdf
Based on your ignorance of the subcommittee that produced the report, your willigness to believe that a Senate subcommittee could release a report (or even worse not release a report redactions not withstanding) shows that you were not lying but simply ignorant.
It had to be one of two. At least you were honest, just wrong.
Stop spreading misinformation. Don't buy into anti-intellectualism, don't be a RINO, Republicans are learned, thoughtful and damn near Spockish in their logical application. Trumpism believes links disappear...from the Senate.
The senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental affairs and the Senate Committee on Finance worked together on this investigation. The report was released by the Majority Staff. So, what you are saying is because it was released by the Majority Staff that none of the findings by both committee's made up by both party representatives are completely false?
My Lib, you need to come up with better B.S. than that.
"why be intellectually dishonest. These are party hack jobs. You only posted one then said it was bi partisan. That is either ignorance (you didn’t know that’s false) or a lie (you knew that’s false and didn’t care).
each side of the aisle submitted competing executive summaries prepared by their respective staffs. You can also just read the conclusions here.
Given that it was a month ago their are many think tank articles around both. You can gather which has been deemed most credible for yourself.
presenting half the story as the entire story is classic disinformation. It’s ok to lie to yourself and engage in confirmation bias but it’s really an ass move to promulgate it."
Maybe you don't comprehend, but it was two bi partisan committee's with its findings being published, let me repeat published by the Senate Majority. You have a very weak argument if you are also saying that the findings in the published report are B.S. since you cannot say that and the rest would be opinion on your part ,I hope I helped in you comprehend what I have said. If not, oh well...
