Do you know what proof is? You want videotape evidence? Doesn't exist. The Perv confessed it on Hannity then has recanted. Multiple women accused him and a mall had to ban him. I say that is overwhelming evidence. 34 year old man with 14 to 17 year olds is proof he's a perv.
Proves he lied about not knowing any of the accusers. No need to prevaricate if innocent.
"Admissible evidence is any document, testimony, or tangible evidence used in a court of law. Evidence is typically introduced to a judge or a jury to prove a point or element in a case. Criminal Law: In criminal law, evidence is used to prove a defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt."
How many trials have you done jack ass? Exactly. Don't confuse your Google search with my law degree and trial experience. If the Perv signed her yearbook it proves that he knew her contrary to his false claims that he did not know any of the accusers. It proves at a minimum that he's a goddamn liar. if he would lie about knowing the girl he would also lie about having raped her when she was not of age. Simple.
Speaking of jackasses. Tell me why they refuse to allow an expert to determine how old the ink used to sign the yearbook is? Spin that, jerk off.
Who is refusing what? Who is they? Does the Perv deny it's his writing? Why are you supporting a Perv? Are you a closet Ped State fan? Joe Parerno was also a Repug. Party over victims? Have you no decency?
Gloria Allred and her client, the woman who lied are refusing to allow a neutral third parry to analyze the writing on the yearbook. Moore's legal team has been asking for the writing that is allegedly Moore's to be analyzed so it is proven without a doubt it's not his handwriting. Yes, he denies even knowing the accuser .
I fell for Fake News by @Dr.L.ThugU . The woman HAS NOT RECANTED.
There is a video of her recanting...nice try. It's from an ABC interview conducted last night and on the link in the OP.
LOL the link would lead to rerun's ass since that's where he pulled that from.
No. Hillary's conduct isn't just shady and may lead one to believe she broke the law. She did break the law and not just because she deleted the emails. Just by having the private server to handle State Department business she broke the law.
Which standard are we talking about? I can tell you're trying to set me up so I want clarity before replying.
Also, where are the links not from PuestoLoco or Mother Jones where law enforcement officials have confirmed he has been known to be a pedophile?
Not just using private emails but setting up a private server in a basement somewhere?
Be more specific. Is having set up a private server in some basement somewhere and there being physical evidence of this having happened admissible for guilt?
http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...-used-personal-email-accounts-for-white-house sure hold them to the same standard crooked Hillary should have been held to.
I'm unaware of these allegations. Can you or can't you provide links?
This thing says "rumor was Roy Moore liked young girls" , seems legit...
I don't know anyone that has been accused of being a pedophile.
clown talk. Ok for some levity. Tell me why “Trump going down” please explain
We have heard countless women come forward and acknowledge Moore dated them when they were teenagers. What a sick person and folks that support the Perv are sicker.
As an officer of the court how would you defend the perv? Perhaps an insanity plea? What about, that's how us right wingers roll? We like em young. Sick azz mofo.
I have heard countless goats come forward and say you diddled them, talk about sick.
