ADVERTISEMENT

Obama and Eric Holder are back to work doing this and it will be fun to watch....

Yeah he just didn't have time to do his job and handle this the last 8 years.
Dude, come on....that is just so ridiculous it isn't even worthy of this reply. What's next? Coach Richt isn't doing his job by making sure everyone makes bed check on the road? Please. You can't be this much out of it.
 
Dude, come on....that is just so ridiculous it isn't even worthy of this reply. What's next? Coach Richt isn't doing his job by making sure everyone makes bed check on the road? Please. You can't be this much out of it.
Please CD, you got a built in excuse or a lie for everything! Obama acting like he just discovered this while he could have fixed is a joke. It was an easy fix while he had the power. Now he's going to play the hero? He's a joke! Holder is worse!
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreakingCane
Please CD, you got a built in excuse or a lie for everything! Obama acting like he just discovered this while he could have fixed is a joke. It was an easy fix while he had the power. Now he's going to play the hero? He's a joke! Holder is worse!
Okay, against my better judgement I will give this a try....because I am not sure how old you are but you either don't know how the government works or don't care. Then get mad when I point it out and call me names. I have to be honest. I am not being arrogant....but you are not aware of things and trying to talk to me as if you know something that doesn't exist. It doesn't work how you think it works...or how Trump thinks it works in your defense....lol. So, you can get pretty far not understanding it if you know the right people.

The United States has 3 Branches of government.

The Executive. (Run by the president)

The Legislative. (Run by Congress)

The Judicial Branch. (Headed by the supreme court)

Barack Obama was the president. That doesn't mean he has any control over the other branches. This is a system of checks and balances in place to protect our democracy. For example, just because Trump wants to ban people from other countries or religions as the president, that doesn't mean he is going to be allowed to do it...or at least do it without major checks.

The article is focused on gerrymandering. This falls under the purview of the Judicial branch. The president doesn't head the judicial branch. There is nothing the president does that dictates anything the judicial branch does. That is for all of our protection. You and I have just as much power as the president in regards to the judicial branch other than appointing judges that run it. Even then, there are prior judges there that have lifetime appointments.

Following me so far?

So you need to understand what gerrymandering is. It isn't changing a law. It is making sure the district lines that are drawn are truly representative of the district. It means if there are in fact a high number of minorities in a district, the law says they get representation in the form of a congressman. Following so far? What was happening is the true district lines were not being represented so minorities were not getting the representations their votes legally should represent.

Keeping up?

All Obama is doing is making sure the districts are aligned with how they truly are. Challenging the falsehoods and winning that with concrete evidence in court.

The president isn't elected to get caught up in legal battles in the Judicial branch. His job is to run the executive branch. Now, he is a citizen like us, he has just as much power to challenge what is illegal.

Somehow I get the feeling you still don't understand this....lol So, again. I am telling you. Ummmm, he was the president of the United States.
 
Last edited:
No your actually sharing your liberal spin. Again I've got miles of examples where you've called me out and I've proved you wrong. It's a Sunday don't let me embarres you again.
No, I am sharing the judges view. Liberal spin is anything you don't agree with. A judges ruling is fact and will happen.
 
Okay, against my better judgement I will give this a try....because I am not sure how old you are but you either don't know how the government works or don't care. Then get mad when I point it out and call me names. I have to be honest. I am not being arrogant....but you are not aware of things and trying to talk to me as if you know something that doesn't exist. It doesn't work how you think it works...or how Trump thinks it works in your defense....lol. So, you can get pretty far not understanding it if you know the right people.

The United States has 3 Branches of government.

The Executive. (Run by the president)

The Legislative. (Run by Congress)

The Judicial Branch. (Headed by the supreme court)

Barack Obama was the president. That doesn't mean he has any control over the other branches. This is a system of checks and balances in place to protect our democracy. For example, just because Trump wants to ban people from other countries or religions as the president, that doesn't mean he is going to be allowed to do it...or at least do it without major checks.

The article is focused on gerrymandering. This falls under the purview of the Judicial branch. The president doesn't head the judicial branch. There is nothing the president does that dictates anything the judicial branch does. That is for all of our protection. You and I have just as much power as the president in regards to the judicial branch other than appointing judges that run it. Even then, there are prior judges there that have lifetime appointments.

Following me so far?

So you need to understand what gerrymandering is. It isn't changing a law. It is making sure the district lines that are drawn are truly representative of the district. It means if there are in fact a high number of minorities in a district, the law says they get representation in the form of a congressman. Following so far? What was happening is the true district lines were not being represented so minorities were not getting the representations their votes legally should represent.

Keeping up?

All Obama is doing is making sure the districts are aligned with how they truly are. Challenging the falsehoods and winning that with concrete evidence in court.

The president isn't elected to get caught up in legal battles in the Judicial branch. His job is to run the executive branch. Now, he is a citizen like us, he has just as much power to challenge what is illegal.

Somehow I get the feeling you still don't understand this....lol So, again. I am telling you. Ummmm, he was the president of the United States.
Again your providing me ammo to school you, I taught you what a repeal of law was last week! Of coarse after you told me I didn't understand Government! Let me enjoy my game today and I'll shred this like I do everything else you lie and spin! And to question or talk to me like you've just done when I've proven you wrong over and over just adds fuel to my fire! Ex: Loretta Lynch you said she recused herself I proved you wrong! Federal funds for shovel ready, again proved you wrong. I'm going to embarres you so severe you'll finally go away! I piss on the likes of you!
 
Last edited:
Si the phrase advocate liberal or conservative judge has never applied?
I don't rate the judges opinion by their political affiliation. Why? Because they are a judge and my opinion does not matter. That is the democracy that is our country's foundation. It isn't my job to apply anything. I live with and accept rulings. Nobody cares if I agree...and sometimes I don't but it doesn't matter.
 
Again your providing me ammo to school you, I taught you what a repeal of law was last week! Of coarse after you told me I didn't understand Government! Let me enjoy my game today and I'll shred this like I do everything else you lie and spin! And to question or talk to me like you've just done when I've proven you wrong over and over just adds fuel to my fire! Ex: Loretta Lynch you said she recused herself I proved you wrong! Federal funds for shovel ready, again proved you wrong. I'm going to embarres you so severe you'll finally go away! I piss on the likes of you!

You also have horrible rambling problem. You must have adult ADD. I like to somewhat at least stay on topic.
 
I don't rate the judges opinion by their political affiliation. Why? Because they are a judge and my opinion does not matter. That is the democracy that is our country's foundation. It isn't my job to apply anything. I live with and accept rulings. Nobody cares if I agree...and sometimes I don't but it doesn't matter.
Ok so again your attempt at deflection and not answering a direct question shows your weak! There's advocate judges in every court which apply the law how they see it. Suppress court a perfect example! Typical deflection, you can't answer a direct question because you know I'm correct
 
You also have horrible rambling problem. You must have adult ADD. I like to somewhat at least stay on topic.
Yeah I must because every time you try and deflect I bring you back to what was being discussed. And again I've proven you wrong so many times I've lost count! And these weren't proving your opinions wrong these were proving things that presented as facts wrong!! I've made you look foolish!
 
Yeah I must because every time you try and deflect I bring you back to what was being discussed. And again I've proven you wrong so many times I've lost count! And these weren't proving your opinions wrong these were proving things that presented as facts wrong!! I've made you look foolish!
Okay...you are rambling off topic again.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT