Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I give a damn! You know white people died to free slaves too. Over 600k of them so spare me the revisionist history. Their blood did mean something. You act like slavery is only an black thing and it only happened in the US. If you live in the past, you'll stay in the past.
Bro, please save that sht. I never wallow in self pity. I try to help people grow. I teach young people how to grow and understanding others. Love and unity. We live in a selfish azz world. Naw, those that judge are losers.
My ass you clown! You wouldn't know American history if it slapped you in the face. You're as bad as the Nazi's and KKK you call everyone to deflect you hypocrite.This is a b.s. revision. White people have never fought en masse for the freedom and rights of black folks. The north could not compete with the fckn free labor of the south is why they were fighting. The shyt was about economics and had not a damn thing to do with them caring about black folks so stop with the embellishments.
My ass you clown! You wouldn't know American history if it slapped you in the face. You're as bad as the Nazi's and KKK you call everyone to deflect you hypocrite.
When was the last time this country needed defending? I am going take a wild guess and say September 11, 2001. Even if you dont consider that an invasion I am betting many folks feel we shouldnt have to wait for another country's military to invade us in order to realize or justify how important our military is to our freedom.Lol, you can't be serious with this post? The flag don't represent the military. The Military is it's own. They do what the government tell them to do! Killing thousands of people overseas is fighting for me? You're naive. I have family members in the Military. I know people that was in the Military. They talk about how you're brainwashed and chipped. How they don't why their fighting the war their fighting. When was the last time this country needed defending? The system that I speak of will never end. That's why all the presidents spoke of a global world. Kennedy tried to kill that noise by getting rid of the CIA. They instead killed him. 911 produced What? A war with Iraq. What excuse they use? Bro you're sleep. You're too American to understand.
Lol, is the sun hot? That's how sure I'm about 911 being a inside job. You people are too American to understand. If white supremacy enslave blacks and took Indians land. You think the shadow government give a damn about You? They don't care who dies in these made up wars for the system agenda.When was the last time this country needed defending? I am going take a wild guess and say September 11, 2001. Even if you dont consider that an invasion I am betting many folks feel that we shouldnt have to wait for a another country's military to invade us in order to realize or justify how important our military is to our freedom.
Say no more.....I know when to call it quits.Lol, is the sun hot? That's how sure I'm about 911 being a inside job. You people are too American to understand. If white supremacy enslave blacks and took Indians land. You think the shadow government give a damn about You? They don't care who dies in these made up wars for the system agenda.
Literally every history book has it well documented the civil war was based on secession and states rights which was because of slavery dickface: had you ever paid any attention you'd know this you uneducated dumbass!You are an azz if you think anyone's buying that bullshyt you're trying to pass as history. Foh, azzhole show me in any history book where it says the civil war was based on freedom and justice for slaves? Show me, jackazz.....Whites, especially at that time, didn't give a damn about justice for black people. They couldn't compete against fckn free labor was the problem. All of you b*stards are Nazi's. You blatantly disregard our lives and the serious nature of what black players are protesting under the guise of it being about some raggedy azz piece of cloth. The way all of you completely overlook the problem and only concern yourself with some perceived bullshyt disrespect is shameful and racist in itself. It's like our lives don't mean shyt but that flag, well now....
According to you...Lol, is the sun hot? That's how sure I'm about 911 being a inside job. You people are too American to understand. If white supremacy enslave blacks and took Indians land. You think the shadow government give a damn about You? They don't care who dies in these made up wars for the system agenda.
Accepting the truth is sometimes very difficult for those who can't cope. Making up your own story might make you feel better but it doesn't mean it's true.According to you...
9/11 was an inside job
Kennedy was an inside job
Jews were never enslaved
The holocaust never happened
China is the cause of hurricanes and earthquakes
What else did Imiss?
Literally every history book has it well documented the civil war was based on secession and states rights which was because of slavery dickface: had you ever paid any attention you'd know this you uneducated dumbass!
You have no idea what you're taking about. Here you go:Your little insults make you sound more ignorant than you are, I said where in the fck does it say the war was based on any concern for black people??? Where the fck does it say in any history book that whites were so upset and concerned about the mistreatment of black people they decided to declare war? Where does it say in any history book that the war was based on freedom and justice for black folks, you lying sack of shyt? Of course it was about slavery and the fckn economic advantage slavery gave the south, Jackazz...
Again not true!You have no idea what you're taking about. Here you go:
"fore was changing attitudes toward slavery. Northern abolitionists began vehemently assailing the institution and the states that continued to practice it, nearly all of them below the Mason-Dixon Line. Some Northerners aided the escape of runaway slaves (a violation of the Constitution’s provisiions that made a fugitive from one state a fugitive in every state) and mobs sometimes assaulted slave owners and slave hunters seeking runaways. (Slavery originally existed in all states, and the writers of the Constitution avoided addressing the matter of perpetuating or ending slavery in order to obtain ratification from all states.) When victory in the Mexican War (1846-48) resulted in the US expanding its territory all the way to the Pacific Ocean, the question of whether or not to permit slavery in the new territories. The debate over slavery intensified, creating a widening gap between slaveholding and nonslaveholding states. When a “purely regional party,” the new Republican Party swept the 1859 elections in the North and the party’s candidate Abraham Lincoln, an avowed foe of the expansion of slavery, Southern states seceded from the Union. See Causes of the Civil War on HistoryNet."
http://www.historynet.com/states-rights-civil-war
I'm sorry I didn't realize you were alive in 1865. It's been recorded in history this way ever since. So those people who won the war, wrote history wrong? Make sense! By the way your 9/11 stuff is beyond nuts. My friends wife was a flight attendant on one of those flights so please spare me the govt inside job stuff. I've seen the transcripts of their cell phone conversation before she died. I was assigned to region 6 JTTF office 2003-2004. Several of the hijackers trained in Venice / Sarasota. That is in Region 6. I know well more about what actually happened on 9/11 than you do I promise.Again not true!
Cash, appreciate you telling the story of your friend's wife but this is the exact response Frick and Frack were hoping for........any sign of misfortune you've had in the past makes their day better. If they're not willing to help themselves there is nothing anyone here can do. You can only go so far when serving and protecting.........and in this case educating.I'm sorry I didn't realize you were alive in 1865. It's been recorded in history this way ever since. So those people who won the war, wrote history wrong? Make sense! By the way your 9/11 stuff is beyond nuts. My friends wife was a flight attendant on one of those flights so please spare me the govt inside job stuff. I've seen the transcripts of their cell phone conversation before she died. I was assigned to region 6 JTTF office 2003-2004. Several of the hijackers trained in Venice / Sarasota. That is in Region 6. I know well more about what actually happened on 9/11 than you do I promise.
Lol, yeah and how dumb can you be. There's 1000s of evidences of a inside job. From financial to military. Look that shit up. The legal documents and everything. They can't tell how building 7 came down. The phony reason for going to war with lraq, but keep sleeping. F a conspiracy. It's all true! Kennedy was killed, because he was about squash the CIA and the shadow government. How naive can you be? 911 was government planned.I'm sorry I didn't realize you were alive in 1865. It's been recorded in history this way ever since. So those people who won the war, wrote history wrong? Make sense! By the way your 9/11 stuff is beyond nuts. My friends wife was a flight attendant on one of those flights so please spare me the govt inside job stuff. I've seen the transcripts of their cell phone conversation before she died. I was assigned to region 6 JTTF office 2003-2004. Several of the hijackers trained in Venice / Sarasota. That is in Region 6. I know well more about what actually happened on 9/11 than you do I promise.
Wtf you mean? I have nothing in heart but love for people period. I just speak facts. Facts about our fake ass government. I can be educated, but not on Bullshit.Cash, appreciate you telling the story of your friend's wife but this is the exact response Frick and Frack were hoping for........any sign of misfortune you've had in the past makes their day better. If they're not willing to help themselves there is nothing anyone here can do. You can only go so far when serving and protecting.........and in this case educating.
-It really was pass interference in the 2003 Fiesta BowlAccording to you...
9/11 was an inside job
Kennedy was an inside job
Jews were never enslaved
The holocaust never happened
China is the cause of hurricanes and earthquakes
What else did Imiss?
Just stop. Building 7 was a controlled detonation. There was structural damage from the other two buildings coming down and a large fire inside but it was safer to drop the building in place rather than risk more life's trying to put the fire out which would eventually caused the support system to fail anyway. Why it wasn't publicized I don't know.Lol, yeah and how dumb can you be. There's 1000s of evidences of a inside job. From financial to military. Look that shit up. The legal documents and everything. They can't tell how building 7 came down. The phony reason for going to war with lraq, but keep sleeping. F a conspiracy. It's all true! Kennedy was killed, because he was about squash the CIA and the shadow government. How naive can you be? 911 was government planned.
Huh? Go read why investigators said, building 7 went down. They said, fire damage.Just stop. Building 7 was a controlled detonation. There was structural damage from the other two buildings coming down and a large fire inside but it was safer to drop the building in place rather than risk more life's trying to put the fire out which would eventually caused the support system to fail anyway. Why it wasn't publicized I don't know.
They said why not howHuh? Go read why investigators said, building 7 went down. They said, fire damage.
What you think?Just to be clear, it was a missile that hit the pentagon on 9/11, not a plane?
The fact you even entertain this as a possibility shows you're missing a few screws.What you think?
You mean the fact that the government is a proven corrupted system? You know this by its history! A system that will lie and cheat its way to the top. Like I said, 911 is a inside job. Don't act like some idiot just saying sht, because our government can't be that evil. Get your lazy ass up and do real reseach with a open mind or shut the f up. There's a alot of sht not adding up. The game and it's players have their hand in the financial part of the 911 shadow government job. The reason for Evading Iraq was full BS, and was call out by Ex-CIA agents, but I'm the missing a few screws huh? SMDHThe fact you even entertain this as a possibility shows you're missing a few screws.
They also said how. Caused by fire!They said why not how
Your point?-It really was pass interference in the 2003 Fiesta Bowl
-Cleveland Gary did fumble against Notre Dame in 1988
-Mark Walton's knee never hit the ground on the kickoff return against Duke in 2015
You mean the fact that the government is a proven corrupted system? You know this by its history! A system that will lie and cheat its way to the top. Like I said, 911 is a inside job. Don't act like some idiot just saying sht, because our government can't be that evil. Get your lazy ass up and do real reseach with a open mind or shut the f up. There's a alot of sht not adding up. The game and it's players have their hand in the financial part of the 911 shadow government job. The reason for Evading Iraq was full BS, and was call out by Ex-CIA agents, but I'm the missing a few screws huh? SMDH
Your little insults make you sound more ignorant than you are, I said where in the fck does it say the war was based on any concern for black people??? Where the fck does it say in any history book that whites were so upset and concerned about the mistreatment of black people they decided to declare war? Where does it say in any history book that the war was based on freedom and justice for black folks, you lying sack of shyt? Of course it was about slavery and the fckn economic advantage slavery gave the south, Jackazz...
You have no idea what you're taking about. Here you go:
"fore was changing attitudes toward slavery. Northern abolitionists began vehemently assailing the institution and the states that continued to practice it, nearly all of them below the Mason-Dixon Line. Some Northerners aided the escape of runaway slaves (a violation of the Constitution’s provisiions that made a fugitive from one state a fugitive in every state) and mobs sometimes assaulted slave owners and slave hunters seeking runaways. (Slavery originally existed in all states, and the writers of the Constitution avoided addressing the matter of perpetuating or ending slavery in order to obtain ratification from all states.) When victory in the Mexican War (1846-48) resulted in the US expanding its territory all the way to the Pacific Ocean, the question of whether or not to permit slavery in the new territories. The debate over slavery intensified, creating a widening gap between slaveholding and nonslaveholding states. When a “purely regional party,” the new Republican Party swept the 1859 elections in the North and the party’s candidate Abraham Lincoln, an avowed foe of the expansion of slavery, Southern states seceded from the Union. See Causes of the Civil War on HistoryNet."
http://www.historynet.com/states-rights-civil-war
You have no idea what you're taking about. Here you go:
"fore was changing attitudes toward slavery. Northern abolitionists began vehemently assailing the institution and the states that continued to practice it, nearly all of them below the Mason-Dixon Line. Some Northerners aided the escape of runaway slaves (a violation of the Constitution’s provisiions that made a fugitive from one state a fugitive in every state) and mobs sometimes assaulted slave owners and slave hunters seeking runaways. (Slavery originally existed in all states, and the writers of the Constitution avoided addressing the matter of perpetuating or ending slavery in order to obtain ratification from all states.) When victory in the Mexican War (1846-48) resulted in the US expanding its territory all the way to the Pacific Ocean, the question of whether or not to permit slavery in the new territories. The debate over slavery intensified, creating a widening gap between slaveholding and nonslaveholding states. When a “purely regional party,” the new Republican Party swept the 1859 elections in the North and the party’s candidate Abraham Lincoln, an avowed foe of the expansion of slavery, Southern states seceded from the Union. See Causes of the Civil War on HistoryNet."
http://www.historynet.com/states-rights-civil-war
No you're assuming how because they stated fire (which there was) but that's an assumption they want you to make. See where I'm going here? A building doesn't fully collapse like that unless it's an extremely hot fire with a high heat booster like aviation fuel or something similar within the facility but it would've had to be at key points in the structure. Or... a controlled detonation! The. Building was collapsed on itselfThey also said how. Caused by fire!
oye! You don't even understand the context of this letter, which honestly doesn't surprise me. President Lincoln was trying to unite the country rather than break it apart. The facts are this: he sent the union states armies and militia to fight against those states which seceded in favor of states rights & slavery. On a side note guys Robert E Lee (even though a confederate general, did not support slavery either) have fun tearing down all those statues though.Here's a letter by Lincoln I suggest you read:
Hon. Horace Greeley:
Dear Sir.
I have just read yours of the 19th. addressed to myself through the New-York Tribune. If there be in it any statements, or assumptions of fact, which I may know to be erroneous, I do not, now and here, controvert them. If there be in it any inferences which I may believe to be falsely drawn, I do not now and here, argue against them. If there be perceptable in it an impatient and dictatorial tone, I waive it in deference to an old friend, whose heart I have always supposed to be right.
As to the policy I "seem to be pursuing" as you say, I have not meant to leave any one in doubt.
I would save the Union. I would save it the shortest way under the Constitution. The sooner the national authority can be restored; the nearer the Union will be "the Union as it was." If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at the same time save slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union. I shall do less whenever I shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more whenever I shall believe doing more will help the cause. I shall try to correct errors when shown to be errors; and I shall adopt new views so fast as they shall appear to be true views.
I have here stated my purpose according to my view of officialduty; and I intend no modification of my oft-expressed personalwish that all men every where could be free.
Yours,
A. Lincoln.
No you're assuming how because they stated fire (which there was) but that's an assumption they want you to make. See where I'm going here? A building doesn't fully collapse like that unless it's an extremely hot fire with a high heat booster like aviation fuel or something similar within the facility but it would've had to be at key points in the structure. Or... a controlled detonation! The. Building was collapsed on itself
oye! You don't even understand the context of this letter, which honestly doesn't surprise me. President Lincoln was trying to unite the country rather than break it apart. The facts are this: he sent the union states armies and militia to fight against those states which seceded in favor of states rights & slavery. On a side note guys Robert E Lee (even though a confederate general, did not support slavery either) have fun tearing down all those statues though.
And again you're a race baiter. You have zero idea what you're talking about because you're literally just regurgitating what you've been told to think. Your opinion doesn't equal fact nor actual history. Good day!Fck Robert E Lee! He like most of the country at that time was a racist, white supremacist minded bastard which is why it's absolutely absurd for you continue with your embellishment about the Civil War being about any justice or equal rights for black people. That's a lie and you know it. I just quoted Lincoln's word, what the hell is wrong with you??? What type of mental barrier do you guys have when it comes to racism and the past? I mean talk about cognitive dissonance. What is there to misunderstand about this statement "If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union". He clearly states that he doesn't give a shyt about the slaves and his only goal was to save the union. Other than the few abolitionist, who were an extremely small percentage in comparison to the population, whites didn't give a shyt about slaves nor what happened to black people otherwise racism would've been dead long ago. Again, the Civil War had nothing to do with white's being concerned about Black folks so stop the bull. It was a war of economic interests on both sides.
Man, how could you find any justification in what they did? All of it was wrong. That's crazyAnd again you're a race baiter. You have zero idea what you're talking about because you're literally just regurgitating what you've been told to think. Your opinion doesn't equal fact nor actual history. Good day!